The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

5 protocols using trimethoprim

1

Evaluating Antibiotic Resistance in CTX-R E. coli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibiotic susceptibilities of CTX-R E. coli and their transconjugants were determined by disk diffusion method according to CLSI protocols (19 ). The following antibiotic disks were used: ampicillin (10 μg), amoxicillin (20 μg) plus clavulanic acid (10 μg), cefoxitin (30 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), cefotaxime (30 μg), cefepime (30 μg), aztreonam (30 μg), imipenem (10 μg), streptomycin (10 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), kanamycin (30 μg), nalidixic acid (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), tetracycline (30 μg), chloramphenicol (30 μg), trimethoprim (5 μg), and sulfonamides (300 μg) (Bio-Rad, Marnes-la-Coquette, France if available or Oxoid, Dardilly, France). The susceptibility breakpoints for all antimicrobials were those recommended by CLSI (20 ).
ESBL production was detected by double-disk synergy test on Mueller-Hinton agar between clavulanic acid and ceftazidime, cefotaxime, or cefepime (20 , 21 (link)). AmpC beta-lactamases detection was based on the inhibitory effect of cloxacillin on AmpC production observed on plates supplemented with 200 mg/L cloxacillin. The control strains used were E. coli ATCC 25922, K. pneumoniae ATCC 700603, and K. pneumoniae CMY-2 from Pr R. Bonnet, France.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Enterobacteriaceae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Disk diffusion method was used to test and confirm the antimicrobial susceptibility of the Enterobacteriaceae isolates using Muller–Hinton agar (MHA, Oxoid, Milan, Italy) and an incubation time of 16–18 h at 37 °C, following the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Guidelines (CLSI) [24 ]. The antimicrobial used were: ciprofloxacin (CIP, 5 µg), nalidixic acid (NA, 30 µg), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (AMC, 20/10 µg), amoxicillin (AML, 25 µg), levofloxacin (LEV, 5 µg), cefotaxime (CTX, 30 µg), sulphonamides (SSS, 300 µg), tetracycline (TE, 30 µg), trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole (SXT, 1,25/23,75 µg), trimethoprim (TMP, 5 µg), chloramphenicol (C, 30 µg), and neomycin (N, 30 µg) (Bio-Rad, Marnes la Coquette, France). The results were assessed following the CLSI guidelines [24 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Urine Culture and Susceptibility Testing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Isolate identification and phenotypic susceptibility testing were performed according to standard procedures at each pathology service. At Dorevitch Pathology, the MSU submitted for laboratory testing was cultured on CHROMID CPS Elite (CPSE) agar incubated overnight at 35°C–37°C in air (bioMérieux). Identification of isolates was confirmed using MALDI-TOF MS on the VITEK MS platform (bioMérieux). Susceptibility testing was performed according to CLSI guidelines using disc diffusion against ampicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanate, cefazolin, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, trimethoprim and nitrofurantoin (Bio-Rad) and supplementary susceptibility testing to fosfomycin, meropenem, ertapenem and gentamicin was performed in the event of E. coli ceftriaxone non-susceptibility.11 Where susceptibility testing was not performed for Staphylococcus saprophyticus, we assumed trimethoprim susceptibility.12 (link) We focused on E. coli for genomic characterization as it is the most frequently isolated bacterium in urine.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibiotic susceptibility was determined by disc diffusion on Mueller–Hinton agar, in accordance with the guidelines of the Antibiogram Committee of the French Society for Microbiology (CA-SFM & EUCAST, 2014 ). The following 32 antimicrobial drugs (Bio-Rad) were tested: ampicillin, ticarcillin, piperacillin, piperacillin/tazobactam, cefamandole, cefoperazone, cefoxitin, cefotaxime, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, ticarcillin/clavulanic acid, imipenem, meropenem, ertapenem, cefepime, ceftazidime, streptomycin, spectinomycin, kanamycin, amikacin, gentamicin, netilmicin, tigecycline, isepamicin, nalidixic acid, pefloxacin, ciprofloxacin, sulfonamides, trimethoprim, sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim, chloramphenicol, tetracycline and azithromycin. Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values for nalidixic acid, ciprofloxacin and azithromycin were determined by Etests (bioMérieux). E. coli CIP 76.24 (ATCC 25922) was used as a control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Antimicrobial Resistance Profiling of Diarrheagenic E. coli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Thirty-one (31) diarrheagenic Eschericia coli (DEC) were subjected to the antimicrobial susceptibility testing. It was carried out by disk diffusion method on Müller-Hinton agar (Liofilchem, Italy) according to the recommendations of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) [10 ]. After depositing the antibiotics, the plates were incubated at +37 °C for 18–24 h. The diameters of the antibiotic sensitivity halos were recorded according to the recommendations of EUCAST. Intermediary (I) susceptibility of pathovars was classified as resistant (R). According to EUCAST recommendations on antibiotics used in case of infection with enterobacteria and in view of the multidrug resistance observed in recent years, 19 antibiotics divided into 7 different families were tested. These include amoxicillin (25 µg), amoxicillinclavulanic acid (20/10 µg), ceftriaxone (30 µg), cefotaxime (30 µg), cefepime (30 – g), cefixime (10 µg), piperacillin (75 µg), piperacillintazobactam (100 +10 µg), imipenem (10 µg), tetracycline (30 µg), chloramphenicol (30 µg), trimethoprim–sulfametoxazole (1.25 ± 23.75 µg), aztreonam (30 µg), colistin sulfate (50 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg), nalidixic acid (30 µg), gentamycin (15 µg), netilmicin (10 µg), and tobramycin (10 µg) (Bio-Rad, France).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!