The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Red dot trace prep

Manufactured by 3M
Sourced in United States

The Red Dot Trace Prep is a laboratory equipment product designed for pretreatment of samples prior to analytical testing. The device facilitates the preparation of samples, ensuring consistent and reliable results for various analytical applications. The core function of the Red Dot Trace Prep is to streamline the sample preparation process, enabling efficient and reproducible sample handling.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

11 protocols using red dot trace prep

1

Underwater Muscle Activity Monitoring with sEMG

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The muscle activation of our target muscles was evaluated by sEMG. To minimize the impedance, the required skin areas for electrode placement were shaved, handled with abrasive material (3M Red Dot Trace Prep), and cleaned with alcohol swab (70% isopropyl). According to previous studies [16 (link),18 (link)], the electrodes were applied to the skin of the dominant leg of participants as follows: GM’s electrode: at a point half of the distance between the greater trochanter of the femur and the superior end of the gluteal cleft (Figure 2a); RF’s electrode: midway between the anterior superior iliac spine and the superior edge of patella (Figure 2b); BF’s electrode: midway between ischial tuberosity and medial joint line of the knee (Figure 2c); GA’s electrode: at a point one-fourth of the distance from the medial knee joint line to the base of the calcaneus (Figure 2d). In order to record sEMG signals under water, waterproof technique was adopted by using tegaderm (3M™ Tegaderm™ Transparent Film Roll 16002). Three bony landmarks with markers of 3 cm in diameter were attached over greater trochanter of femur, lateral epicondyle of femur, and lateral malleolus for kinematic tracking (Figure 2e).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Large-array Surface EMG Mapping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Right and left erector spinae’ activity was recorded using two large-arrays surface EMG matrices (model ELSCH064; LISiN-OT Bioelettronica; Torino, Italy). The array grid consisted of 64 electrodes placed in an 8x8 matrix (10 mm inter-electrode distance). The center of each grid was located at L3 level (Fig 2), and one ground electrode was placed on the left ulnar process. Skin impedance was reduced by shaving body hair, gently exfoliating the skin with fine-grade sandpaper (Red DotTrace Prep, 3 M; St. Paul, MN, USA) and wiping the skin with alcohol swabs. The bipolar EMG signals were amplified (64-channel surface EMG amplifier, SEA 64, LISiN-OT Bioelettronica; Torino, Italy; –3 dB bandwidth 10–500 Hz) by a factor of 2000, sampled at 2048 Hz and converted to digital form by a 12 bit A/D converter. The data were collected using the OT Bioelettronica custom software and processed by Matlab (MathWorks; Natick, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Standardized sEMG Normalization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Surface electromyography (sEMG) electrodes (bipolar electrodes with a 8 mm inter-electrodes distance) were applied bilaterally at approximately 2 cm from the spine (over the belly of the thoracic erector spinae muscles and in line with muscle fibers), at the level of T5 and T8 spinous processes and between T6 and T7 spinous processes (total of 6 electrodes). Before applying the electrodes, the skin was shaved, gently abraded with fine-grade sandpaper (Red Dot Trace Prep, 3 M; St. Paul, MN, USA), and cleaned with alcohol swabs. All sEMG were recorded at 2000 Hz using Trigno Wireless EMG sensors (Delsys Inc., Natick, Massachusetts, USA), which contain two differential EMG inputs with two patented stabilizing references and therefore this system does not require an external reference electrode. Participants were then required to relax quietly on the table while sEMG activity was recorded during 4 s using EMGworks 4.2 software (Delsys Inc., Natick, Massachusetts, USA). The signal recorded by each electrode during this trial (further referred to as the sEMG normalization trial) was subsequently used to normalize the respective electrode signal obtained during the various spinal stiffness assessments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Bilateral Lumbar Electromyography Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Surface electromyography (EMG) data were collected bilaterally using bar bipolar active surface electrodes applied over the lumbar erector spinae (LES) muscles at the L4–L5 and L2-L3 levels, approximately 3 cm from the mid-line (electrodes were applied in-line with muscle fiber direction). Electrode material was 99.9% Ag and the interelectrode distance was fixed at 10 mm. A ground electrode was placed on the left anterior superior iliac spine. Skin impedance was reduced by (1) shaving body hair, (2) gently abrading the skin with fine-grade sandpaper (Red Dot Trace Prep, 3M, St. Paul, MN, USA), and (3) wiping the skin with alcohol swabs. EMG activity was recorded using a single differential Delsys Surface EMG sensor with a common mode rejection ratio of 92 dB at 60 Hz, a noise level of 1.2 μV, a gain of 10 V/V ± 1%, an input impedance of 1015 Ω, a bandwidth of 20–450 ± 10% (Model DE2.1, Delsys Inc., Boston, MA, USA) and sampled at 1000 Hz with a 12-bit A/D converter (PCI 6024E, National Instruments, Austin, TX, USA). The EMG data were filtered digitally by a 10- to 450-Hz bandpass, zero-lag, fourth-order Butterworth filter. Data were collected using LabView (National Instruments, Austin, TX, USA) and processed by Matlab (R2007b MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Somatosensory Evoked Potential Recordings

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All recordings were performed in a supine position. Time‐locked SSRs were recorded in response to contact heat and pinprick stimulation of the affected and control areas. Surface electrodes (Ambu BlueSensor NF, Ballerup, Denmark) were attached to the recording site, which consisted of the hand contralateral to the affected area. The skin temperature of the recording and stimulation sites was kept constant (≥ 32°C) with heating lamps throughout all measurements (Deltombe et al., 1998 (link)). The recording site was prepared with skin prep sandpaper tape (Red Dot™ Trace Prep, 3M) and alcohol. The active electrode was attached to the hand palm, and the reference electrode was attached to the hand dorsum. SSRs were measured as the voltage difference between the active and the reference electrode (mV). SSRs were sampled at 2000 Hz with a pre‐amplifier and a 0.1–12 kHz frequency filter. The recording window was set to 1 s pre‐trigger and 9 s post‐trigger in a customized program based on LabView (V2.6.1. CHEP, ALEA30 Solutions). Signals contaminated with movement artefacts or non‐time‐locked responses were excluded offline. SSR latencies defined as the first deflection point of the signal and SSR amplitudes (i.e., peak‐to‐peak responses) were detected using a customized algorithm in R statistical software for MacOS Mojave 10.14.6, version 4.1.0. (Scheuren et al., 2020 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Leg Muscle EMG and Kinematic Tracking

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The EMG electrodes were attached over RF and BF muscles of the dominant leg of participants. The location of the RF’s electrode was at the midway between the anterior superior iliac spine and the upper edge of patella (Figure 1a). The location of the RF’ electrode was at the midway between gluteal fold and knee crease (Figure 1b). The location of the ground electrode was over tibial tuberosity (Figure 1c). The required skin areas were shaved, handled with abrasive material (3M Red Dot Trace Prep) and cleaned with alcohol swab (70%isopropyl). For the bony landmarks of (1) greater trochanter of femur, (2) lateral epicondyle of femur and (3) lateral malleolus, markers of 3cm in diameter were attached (Figure 1d) and covered with tegaderm (Smith and Nephew Flexifix Opsite Transparent Adhesive Film Roll 4” x10.9 Yard, model66000041) for kinematic tracking.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Porcine Anaesthesia Monitoring Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
On the experimental day, one pig was brought into the experimental room and allowed to acclimatize for approximately 30 minutes before being placed into an on-purpose made sling. A local anaesthetic cream (EMLA, 5%, Anesderm, Pierre Fabre, Switzerland) was applied to the auricular vein and artery, and over the coccygeal artery, ensuring complete coverage, and left acting for at least 45 minutes before catheters placement. During this period, a six leads wireless device (Televet 100, Engel Engineering Services GmbH, Germany) was applied to continuously record electrocardiographic activity. The area between the frontal and the occipital bone, over the tibialis cranialis muscle and over the right metatarsus was clipped, cleaned with a warm antiseptic soap solution and shaved with a razor. Once dried, the skin was rubbed with abrasive paper (Red Dot Trace Prep, 3M Health Care, Canada) and benzinum medicinale (Benzinum Medicinale, Hänseler AG, Switzerland) was applied to the skin to remove excess fat. During the whole experimental period, the following clinical variables were continuously assessed and reported on an anaesthesia record sheet every 5 minutes: heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), diastolic (DAP), mean (MAP) and systolic (SAP) invasive blood pressure, as well as palpebral reflex and jaw tone, that were scored as “0” = absent, “1” = reduced or “2” = as awake.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Lumbar and Leg Muscle Activation Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Surface electromyography (sEMG), consisting of bipolar disposable surface Ag/AgCl electrodes (Bortec Biomedical, Calgary, Alberta, Canada), was used to register muscle activation strategy for lumbar erector spinae at L3 and at vastus lateralis. Skin was prepared to reduce skin impedance by shaving body hair, gently abrading with fine-grade sandpaper (Red Dot Trace Prep; 3M, St. Paul, Minnesota) and wiping with alcohol swabs. Electrodes were then placed bilaterally, and a ground was positioned on the left ASIS completed the setup. A Delsys sEMG sensor recorded data with a common mode rejection ratio of 92dB at 60Hz and an input impedance of 1015 Ω (model DE2.1; Delsys, Inc., Boston, Massachusetts). Data were sampled at 1000Hz with a 12-bit A/D converter (PCI 6024E; National Instruments, Austin, Texas). After the data collection with LabView (National Instruments, Austin, Texas), the sEMG signals were processed by Matlab (MathWorks, Natick, Massachusetts).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Bipolar EMG Electrode Placement and Signal Acquisition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two bipolar surface electrodes (Model DE2.1, Delsys Inc., Boston, MA, USA) were used to record EMG activity during the baseline and post-intervention MVCs, and during the muscle fatigue task. Electrodes were positioned on the upper trapezius and the middle deltoid muscles on the dominant arm, following the muscle fibers orientation, at the level of the most prominent part of the muscle belly, according to SENIAM recommendations (41 (link)). Electrodes’ material was 99.9% Ag, and the inter-electrode distance was fixed at 10 mm. A reference electrode was positioned on same side acromion. Skin impedance on these three areas was reduced with: (1) shaving body hair, (2) gently abrading the skin with fine-grade sandpaper (Red Dot Trace Prep, 3 M; St. Paul, MN, USA) and (3) wiping the skin with alcohol swabs.
Bipolar EMG signals were amplified (DE2.1 model; Delsys, Inc., Boston, Massachusetts) by a factor of 1,000, sampled at 2,048 Hz and converted to digital form by a 12-bit A/D converter. Data were collected and processed with OT Bioelettronica (64-channel surface EMG amplifiers, SEA 64, LISiN-OT Bioelettronica; Torino, Italy; −3 dB bandwidths 10–500 Hz).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

High-Density EMG of Lumbar Muscles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Myoelectric activity was recorded from the lumbar erector spinae muscles (Figure 2a). The skin over the erector spinae was cleaned with fine-grade sandpaper (Red DotTrace Prep; 3 M, St. Paul, MN), and shaved. Muscle activity was recorded with two high-density surface EMG (HDsEMG) of 64 electrodes arranged in 8 columns and 8 rows spaced by 10 mm (semidisposable adhesive matrix; model ELSCH064, OTBioelettronica, Torino, Italy). The electrode grids were placed orienting the columns along the approximate fiber orientation of the erector spinae muscle (Kalimo et al. 1989 ). The center of each grid was located at L3 level, and the medial edge of the grid was at ~1 cm from the L3 spinous process. Manual palpation of the vertebrae was performed by the same assessor to localize the lumbar region. Reference electrodes were placed over the right iliac crest.
Signals from the bipolar HDsEMG were amplified (128-channel EMG-USB; OTBioelettronica; -3 dB, bandwidths 10-500 Hz) by a factor of 5,000 and digitized at 2048 Hz using a 12-bit A/D converter. The same assessor was responsible for the placement of the grids and the skin was marked to minimize variability between days. Moderate to good between-day reliability has been established for amplitude distribution parameters measured with HDsEMG (Abboud et al. 2015; (link)Afsharipour et al. 2016) (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!