The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Qtrap 4500 lc ms ms system

Manufactured by AB Sciex
Sourced in United States, Canada

The QTRAP 4500 LC-MS/MS system is a high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) instrument. It combines a triple quadrupole mass analyzer with a linear ion trap to provide enhanced sensitivity and selectivity for quantitative and qualitative analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using qtrap 4500 lc ms ms system

1

Quantification of Erlotinib in Tumor Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pre-treated samples were separated by liquid chromatography (Nexera × 2 series; Shimadzu) with an Xbridge C18 column (3.5 µm, 2.1 × 5.0 mm) (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) with temperature set at 40 °C. Mobile phases A and B were 0.1% aqueous solution of formic acid and 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile, respectively; the flow rate was 0.2 mL/min and gradient elution was applied (Supplementary Table S2). Injection volume was 20 µL.
Erlotinib was quantified by using multiple reaction monitoring on a QTRAP 4500 LC-MS/MS system (AB Sciex, Framingham, MA, USA) in the electrospray ionization positive mode. The monitored transitions were 394 to 336 for erlotinib and 400 to 338.9 for erlotinib D6 (Supplementary Table 1). Data was processed using Analyst software (version 1.6.1, AB Sciex). Erlotinib concentration in tumour tissues was calculated by dividing the quantity of erlotinib in the tissue section by the quantity of protein in the adjacent tissue section.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Peptide Sequencing by Microfluidic LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sequencing of peptides was performed using an Eksigent ekspert™ microLC 200 system (Eksigent). The extracts (15 μl injection, loop volume 10 µl) were separated on a reversed-phase Eksigent 3C8-CL-120 column (100 × 0.5 mm, 3 μm) at 40 °C. Gradient flow rates were as follows: 28.5 µl/min A (1.5 µl/min B), 1 min 9.5 µl/min A (0.5 µl/min B), 40 min 6 µl/min A (4 µl/min B), 45 min 0.5 µl/min A (9.5 µl/min B), 50 min 0 µl/min A (20 µl/min B), 50.1 min 19 µl/min A (1 µl/min B), 53 min 9.5 µl/min A (0.5 µl/min B). Both solvents (A- H2O, B-ACN) were supplemented with 0.1 % of formic acid. Analyses were performed on an QTRAP 4500 LC–MS/MS system (AB Sciex) using electrospray ionization (ESI). MS/MS spectra were acquired in the data-dependent mode. Doubly, triply or fourthly charged peptide ions were identified from a survey scan (m/z 500–1,500), following which individual precursor ions were automatically selected for fragmentation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

ALLO Quantification in Chick Pineal Gland

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ALLO concentration in the chick pineal gland was measured by liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-ESI-MS/MS; QTRAP 4500 LC-MS/MS System; AB Sciex, Foster City, CA). In brief, 5 mg of pineal gland tissue was homogenized in 1 mL methanol/H2O (75:25; vol/vol) on ice. The homogenate was loaded on Isolute SLE+ cartridges (Biotage, Uppsala, Sweden) for supported liquid–liquid extraction, and the steroid fractions were eluted with dichloromethane and subjected to LC-ESI-MS/MS analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative Proteomics of Sperm Lysates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sperm lysates were extracted in 50 μL of lysis buffer (8 M Urea, 0.2 M Ammonium Bicarbonate) with sonication. Each sperm lysate was trypsin-digested and labeled with iTRAQ 4-plex reagent (AB SCIEX) according to the manufacture’s instruction. The labeled peptides were applied to QTRAP®4500 LC/MS/MS System (AB SCIEX). These experiments were performed in duplicate. Identification and quantification of proteins from sperm lysates were performed using the ProteinPilot software, Version 4.0 (AB SCIEX).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantification of Mogrosides in Luo Han Guo

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mogroside MIIE, MIII, MIV, MIVA, Si, MV, IMV, OMV, and MVI were detected by LC-MS/MS following previously described methods [38 ]. The HPLC system consisted of an Agilent Technologies 1260 Series LC system (Agilent, USA) equipped with an automatic degasser, a quaternary pump, and an autosampler. Chromatographic separations were performed on an Agilent Poroshell 120 SB C18 column (100 × 2.1 mm, 2.7 μm) by gradient elution using a mobile phase consisting of (A) water (containing 0.1% formic acid) and (B) acetonitrile (containing 0.1% formic acid) with the following gradient procedure: 0 min, 26% B; 5 min, 32% B; 5.01–5.50 min, 80% B; and 5.51–10.0 min, 26% B. The flow rate was 0.25 mL·min−1, and the injection volume was 10 μL. The column effluent was monitored using a 4500 QTRAP® LC-MS/MS system (AB Sciex, Toronto, Canada). The compound-dependent instrumental parameters were optimized and listed in AppendixTable A2. Both the standards and samples of nine mogrosides in the LC-MS/MS chromatograms are displayed in AppendixFigure A3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative Analysis of Marine Toxins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Perform toxin analysis according to the method described by Nishimura et al. (44 (link)). A crude toxin extract (1 mL) was taken and mixed with 60 µL of 2.5 M NaOH, followed by incubation in a water bath at 70°C for 40 min. After cooling to room temperature, 60 µL of 2.5 M HCl was added to the mixture, which was then filtered through a 0.22-µm spin filter (Pall Corporation, USA) and stored at −20°C for subsequent analysis by liquid chromatography. The reference standards for the three DSTs (OA, DTX1, and DTX2) were procured from the National Research Council of Canada’s Institute for Marine Biosciences, and absolute quantification was performed. Regression curves were constructed based on the known toxin concentrations and spectral areas, enabling the quantification of toxin levels in the samples. Analytical software was utilized to visualize the toxin spectra and facilitate quantification. The determination and quantification of LC/MS were carried out using an HPLC system (Shimadzu Prominence LC-20ADXR) coupled with a tandem mass spectrometer (4500 QTRAP LC-MS/MS system, AB Sciex Instruments, Foster City, CA). Phenomenex Kinetex XB-C18 (150 × 2.1 mm, 2.6 µm) column was utilized for toxin separation, with the mobile phase consisting of acetonitrile (solvent A) and 0.15% formic acid in water (solvent B).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!