The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Accelrys discovery studio 3

Manufactured by Dassault Systèmes
Sourced in United Kingdom, United States

Accelrys Discovery Studio 3.5 is a comprehensive software suite for molecular modeling, simulation, and analysis. It provides a range of computational tools and methods for studying the structure, function, and interactions of biological molecules.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using accelrys discovery studio 3

1

Molecular Docking of NA Inhibitor 15a

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A reference H1N1 NA structure (A/California/04/2009) for molecular docking analysis on NA binding to 15a was obtained from the Protein Data Bank (PDB) accession No. 3TI6, which showed 3D structures of the viral NA complexed with OSV-C (Vavricka et al., 2011 (link)). The CHARMM force field parameters were first assigned for the PR8 NA protein and the binding site was defined using the advanced Define and Edit Binding Site tools. Docking calculations were carried out using ligandfit software interfaced with Accelrys Discovery Studio 3.5 (Accelrys Software Inc., San Diego, CA) (Venkatachalam et al., 2003 (link)). In detail, the ligand 15a was loaded in the protein’s binding site to have low-energy conformations using the protocol ‘Generate Conformations’ in Discovery Studio 3.5. To verify the reliability of our simulation protocol, we performed self-docking analysis using OSV-C as a reference antiviral compound. Based on the parameters used for OSV-C, 15a was in silico docked to the OSV-C binding site within the PR8 NA protein.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Molecular Docking of Ethynylflavones with P450s

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Docking simulations of the
ethynylflavones with human P450s 1A1 and 1A2 were performed using
the LigandFit module in Accelrys Discovery Studio 3.5 (Accelrys, San
Diego, CA). The crystal structures of human cytochrome P450s 1A1 and
1A2 in complex with α-naphthoflavone (PDB ID: 4I8V and 2HI4) are available from
the Protein Data Bank (PDB).23 (link),24 (link) For the crystal structure
of P450 1A1, subunit A was used for docking simulations. Water molecules
in the crystal structures were removed, and hydrogen atoms were added
to the P450 templates under the CHARMm force field. The 3D structures
of ethynylflavones were built using a 3D-sketcher module in Accelrys
Discovery Studio. Partial atomic charges were assigned to each atom
with the Gasteiger Charge method, and energy minimization of each
molecule was performed using the conjugate gradient method with CHARMm
force field. The minimization was terminated when the energy gradient
convergence criterion of 0.001 kcal/mol·Å was reached. To
explore the binding modes of the 3D-structures of ethynylflavones
to P450s 1A1 and 1A2, the docking program LigandFit was used to automatically
dock the ligands into the active site cavities of the enzymes. In
the docking process, the standard flexible docking protocol was performed.
Ten conformers of each molecule were automatically formed, which are
the best fit into the defined active site cavities.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Structural Insights into EGFR-Erlotinib Complex

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The crystal structure of EGFR complexed with erlotinib (PDB ID: 1M17) [39 (link)] was downloaded from Protein Data Bank (PDB). The 3D structure of the drug (erlotinib) was obtained from the ZINC database, whilst the 3D structures of vinyl sulfone derivatives were generated using the Gaussian 09 program. Note that the vinyl sulfone derivatives were constructed according to their availability from previous study [21 (link),22 (link),23 (link),24 (link)]. All the ligands were optimized using the Gaussian 09 program (HF/6–31d) as per the standard protocol [42 (link),43 (link),44 ]. The protonation state of all studied ligands was characterized using the ChemAxon [45 (link)].
For system validation, the crystalized ligands were defined as a center in the active site for redocking using CDOCKER programs and the results are shown in Supplementary Figure S1. The docking protocols of EGFR system was set as 15 Å for sphere docking and docked into the binding pocket with 100 independent runs. The binding between protein and compounds/drug was visualized using the Accelrys Discovery Studio 3.0 (Accelrys Inc., Cambridge, UK) and UCSF Chimera package [46 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Structural Analysis of TLR4/MD-2 Complex

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The crystaliographic structure of TLR4/myeloid differentiation factor 2 (MD-2) (PDB: 3FXI) was obtained from the Protein Data Bank (PDB) (http://www.rcsb.org/pdb). The two-dimensional structures of Octominin was drawn by MDL ISIS Draw 2.5 standalone software and converted into three-dimensional structures using the Accelrys Discovery Studio 3.0 (Accelrys, Inc). Binding was evaluated based on CDOCKER.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Molecular Docking and Binding Energy Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All molecular simulations were performed using Discovery Studio 3.1 (Accelrys, San Diego, CA, USA). Accelrys Discovery Studio 3.1 is available from Accelrys Inc.-San Diego, CA 92,121, USA. Protein structures were obtained from the Protein Data Bank (PDB). All protein structures were prepared before molecular docking. Active sites were defined using “From Current Selection” tools based on active residues including catalytic triad residues and oxyanion hole residues. All chemical compounds were constructed manually using Discovery Studio Visualizer and were subjected to the “Minimization” module for full structural refinement with 5000 steps of the steepest descent algorithm, followed by 2000 steps of the conjugate gradient algorithm energy minimization, utilizing the generalized born implicit solvent model and the CHARMM forcefield. Molecular docking was then performed using the “Flexible Docking” module [21] (link) implemented in Discovery Studio 3.1 [22] (link). Finally, conformations with highest -CDocker interaction energy in each docking process were analyzed and visualized in Discovery Studio (detailed in Supporting information). For the substrate binding step, -CDocker Interaction Energy (-CDIE) and -CDocker Energy (-CDE) were used to evaluate the interaction energy and enzyme-substrate complex stability, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Computational Modeling of Human OSTβ Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All molecular modeling studies were conducted using Accelrys Discovery Studio 3.1 (Accelrys Software, Inc., San Diego, CA; http://accelrys.com). All crystal structure coordinates used in these studies were obtained from the protein data bank (http://www.pdb.org). The protein homology model of human OSTβ was constructed with the MODELLER protocol [13 (link)] using the crystal structures of acetyl CoA synthetase [14 (link)] (PDB ID: 1PG4) and leucyl-tRNA synthetase [15 (link)] (PDB ID: 1WKB) as templates. Prediction of the orientation of the OSTβ homology model in the plasma membrane was calculated using the Generalized-Born with implicit membrane algorithm [16 ]. The transmembrane segment of the model was then subjected to conformational optimization utilizing the LOOPER algorithm [17 (link)] followed by a final energy minimization with the conjugate gradient minimization protocol (10,000 iterations with a root mean square cutoff of 0.01 kcal/mol) using a CHARMm forcefield and the Generalized Born implicit solvent model [18 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!