All procedures were performed by one interventional radiologist with 4 years of experience in PICC placement. Fluoroscopy-guided PICC was performed in the intervention clinic using a low-dose X-ray system (Allura Clarity, Philips Healthcare, The Netherlands) and US guidance (EPIQ, Philips) with a 5- to 18-MHz linear-array transducer. Bedside PICC was performed using portable DR (DRX-Revolution, Carestream Health, NY) and US guidance (EPIQ, Philips) with a 5- to 12-MHz linear-array transducer. Turbo-Ject Power-Injectable PICC (Cook, Bloomington, IN) and Power Injectable Pro-PICC (Medcomp, Harleysville, PA) devices, of 5-F dual lumen or 6-F triple lumen, were used for all patients.
Drx revolution
Manufactured by Carestream
Sourced in United States
The DRX-Revolution is a mobile X-ray system designed for use in healthcare settings. It provides digital radiography capabilities to support various imaging needs. The system features a compact and maneuverable design to enable convenient patient bedside imaging.
Automatically generated - may contain errors
Lab products found in correlation
Allura clarity, by Philips (1 mentions)
Turbo ject power injectable picc, by Cook Medical (1 mentions)
Emotion 16, by Siemens (1 mentions)
Optima xr220, by GE Healthcare (1 mentions)
Fluorospot compact fd, by Siemens (1 mentions)
Somatom definition as, by Siemens (1 mentions)
Somatom force, by Siemens (1 mentions)
Somatom definition, by Siemens (1 mentions)
Somatom sensation 64, by Siemens (1 mentions)
5 protocols using drx revolution
1
Fluoroscopy-guided vs. Bedside PICC Placement
2
Emergency Department Chest Radiographs
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
The study included only initial chest radiographs obtained in the emergency department (one radiograph per patient). In cases of multiple visits to the emergency department during the study period, chest radiographs obtained at the initial visit were included.
Posteroanterior and anteroposterior radiographs were included in this study. Posteroanterior radiographs were obtained in an erect position using a single fixed radiography unit (Multix FD; Siemens Helthineers, Erlangen, Germany), while anteroposterior radiographs were obtained in the supine position using a portable radiography scanner (DRX-Revolution; Carestream Health, Rochester, NY, USA).
Posteroanterior and anteroposterior radiographs were included in this study. Posteroanterior radiographs were obtained in an erect position using a single fixed radiography unit (Multix FD; Siemens Helthineers, Erlangen, Germany), while anteroposterior radiographs were obtained in the supine position using a portable radiography scanner (DRX-Revolution; Carestream Health, Rochester, NY, USA).
3
Radiographic Evaluation of COVID-19 Patients
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
We retrospectively included consecutive patients using the following criteria: 1) patients who visited a tertiary academic institution for the diagnosis of suspicious COVID-19 or management of confirmed COVID-19 between January 31, 2020 and March 10, 2020; and 2) patients who underwent CXR with a dedicated protocol for suspicious COVID-19 patients including CAD analyses. The initial CXR of each patient obtained after the visit were included in the present study. All CXR were obtained with a dedicated mobile X-ray system (DRX-revolution, Carestream Health). Erect posteroanterior X-rays or supine anteroposterior X-rays were obtained, depending on the patients' condition.
4
Multidetector CT and Chest Radiograph Protocol
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
All noncontrast CT scans were obtained in the supine position at full inspiration using a multidetector CT scanner with 16 or more detector channels (Emotion 16, Somatom Sensation 64, Somatom Definition, Somatom Definition AS+, and Somatom Force; Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany). The CT tube voltage and current were 120 kVp, and a standard-dose or low-dose setting with automatic exposure control was used according to institutional protocols. Axial CT images were reconstructed with a slice thickness of 1 mm (3 mm in a minority of the cases) and a sharp reconstruction kernel. Chest radiographs were obtained using the following devices: DRX-Revolution (Carestream Health, Rochester, NY); Optima XR220 (GE Healthcare, Chicago, Ill); Fluorospot Compact FD (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany); and CXDI (Canon, Tokyo, Japan). All chest radiographs consisted of single frontal view. Fourteen chest radiographs were taken at upright position with posteroanterior projection, and the remaining were taken with anteroposterior (AP) projection in supine position or sitting position.
5
Hospital Chest X-Ray Monitoring
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
All CXRs were obtained using a digital radiography system (DRX-Revolution, Carestream Health, Rochester, NY, USA). Patients underwent initial CXRs on their hospital day 1 and serial CXRs (interval, 1–7 days) according to their clinical status during hospitalization. All CXRs comprised a single frontal view, either an anteroposterior or a posteroanterior projection.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!