The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Lsr 2 fortessa cytometer

Manufactured by BD
Sourced in United States

The BD LSR II Fortessa cytometer is a high-performance flow cytometry instrument designed for advanced cell analysis. It provides precise detection and measurement of various cellular parameters, including size, granularity, and the expression of specific surface markers or intracellular molecules. The LSR II Fortessa cytometer is capable of accurately analyzing multiple parameters simultaneously on a large number of individual cells within a sample.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

39 protocols using lsr 2 fortessa cytometer

1

BRD4 Inhibition Phenotype Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The RFP expression which represents BRD4 inhibition phenotype was measured on LSR Fortessa II cytometer interfaced with FACSDiva (BD Biosciences). Live cells were gated based on the FSC-A and SSC-A, followed by FSC-A and FSC-H gating to select the singlet cells. FlowJo software version 10 (Tree Star) was used for data analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Cytokine Profiling of MDSC Cultures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MDSC suppression assay culture supernatants were analyzed for the presence of IFN-γ, IL-2, IL-4, IL-10 and IL-17A using BD Cell Bead Array (CBA) flex sets and human soluble protein master buffer kit (BD Sciences) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Samples were evaluated on a LSR Fortessa II cytometer (BD Sciences). Flow data were analyzed using FCAP Array software (BD Sciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterizing Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following anti-human/rhesus monkey cross-reactive antibodies (Abs) were used to characterize mMDSC and lymphocyte subsets by multi-color fluorescence-activated cell staining (FACS) analysis: anti-CD3 (clone # SP34–2), -CD4 (L200), -CD8 (RPA-T8), -CD11b (ICRF44), -CD14 (M5E5), -CD127 (HIL-7R-M21), -CD62L (SK11), -CD45RA (5H9), -HLA-DR (G46–6), -CCR5 (3A9), - CD11a (HI111), -CD103 (Ber-ACT8) (all BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA), anti-CD20 (2H7), -CD28 (CD28.2), -CD95 (DX2), -CCR6 (G034E3), -B7-integrin (FIB504) (Biolegend, San Diego, CA), anti-CD33 (AC104.3E3) (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA) and anti-CD25 (BC96) (eBioscience, San Diego, CA). Ab cross-reactivity was confirmed by vendor technical data sheets and by the NHP Reagent Resource website (www.nhpreagents.org). Briefly, PBMC were suspended in cell staining buffer (CSB; 1x PBS/1% denatured fetal calf serum [Atlanta Biologicals]). After addition of Abs, cells were incubated for 20 min at 4°C protected from light, then washed with 2 ml cell staining buffer. After centrifugation, cell pellets were suspended in CSB and held on ice until analyzed. Isotype-matched irrelevant Abs were used as controls. Flow cytometry was performed using a LSR Fortessa II cytometer (BD Sciences). Data acquired were analyzed with FlowJo software (Tree Star Inc., San Carlos, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multiplex Flow Cytometry for Immune Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For flow cytometric analysis, cell suspensions were Fc-blocked using anti-CD16/32 mAb (BioLegend, clone 93) combined to murine serum 4% (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Stainings were performed with the following mAb: CD45.2-BUV737 (clone 104, BD), Ly6G-BUV395 (clone 1A8, BD), Ly6C-BV785 (clone HK1.4, BioLegend), CD11b-PerCp5.5 (clone M1/70, BioLegend), F4/80–Alexa Fluor 594 (BM8, BioLegend), F4/80-APC (allophycocyanin) (BM8, BioLegend), F4/80-APCCy7 (BM8, BioLegend), mCD20–Alexa Fluor 647 (clone SA275A11, BioLegend), and anti-IgG–PE (phycoerythrin) (poly4053, BioLegend). Analyses were performed with an LSRFortessa II cytometer (BD Biosciences) or a CytoFLEX LX (Beckman Coulter) and analyzed with FlowJo software version 10.6.2 (BD Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Isolation and Characterization of Memory B Cell Subsets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Memory B cells were stained with 5 μM Cell Trace Violet (ThermoFisher Scientific, Paisley, UK) as directed in the datasheet, and incubated overnight at 37°C 5% CO
2. The cells were then washed and cultured using the optimal DoE conditions. For flow cytometry experiments cells were then stained with Aqua Live/Dead cell viability dye (BD Biosciences, Oxford, UK) as per manufacturer’s instruction. Cells were then stained with the phenotyping panel shown in
Table 2. The cells were analysed using an LSR Fortessa II cytometer (BD Biosciences) at baseline, day 5 and day 10 of culture. The gating strategy used can be seen in
Supplementary Figure 1. Purity of CD27
+ memory B cells following isolation by magnetic selection was also determined using this panel. For FACS, memory B cells were sorted based upon IgD and IgM expression into 4 sub-populations (IgD
+ IgM
-, IgD
+ IgM
+, IgD
- IgM
+, IgD
- IgM
-) as shown in
Supplementary Figure 1. Cell sorting was carried out using a BD FACSAria III.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Mycobacterial Phagosomal Permeabilization Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CCF-4 assay was conducted as previously described [28 (link)], with minor modifications. Briefly, 1 x 106 THP-1 cells were seeded on 12-well tissue culture plates and treated with 33 nM PMA for three days. Cells were then washed with media and then infected with single-cell suspensions of tdTomato-expressing wildtype, ΔESX-1, or ΔmmpL7 M. marinum at a MOI of 1 for 4 h at 33°C in EM medium. 24 hours post infection cells were stained with Fixable Viability Dye eFluor660 (eBioscience). Cells were then harvested and stained for 1h at room temperature with 8 μM CCF4-AM (Invitrogen) in EM medium supplemented with 2.5 μM probenecid. Finally, cells were fixed overnight at 4°C in 4% (wt/vol) paraformaldehyde. Cells were analyzed in an LSRFortessa II cytometer, using FACSDiva software (BD Biosciences). At least 40,000 events per sample were collected. Data were analyzed using FlowJo (Treestar). Permeabilization percentage among infected monocytes was calculated using a region defined by an increased 450 nm signal (indicating CCF4 dye cleavage and, therefore phagosomal permeabilization) relative to uninfected cells in the same sample. Events in this region were designated “permeabilized”. Percent permeabilization was then calculated as a ratio of events in the permeabilized field over total live and infected cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

IFN-γ Intracellular Cytokine Staining

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Positive results in the ELISpot assay were validated by ICS for IFN‐γ as described previously.35 The pre‐cultured cells were restimulated with the peptides showing a positive result at a concentration of 10 μg mL−1 for 16 h at 37°C and 5% CO2. After one hour, Brefeldin A (Sigma‐Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) in a final concentration of 5 μg mL−1 was added to inhibit cytokine secretion.
The cells were stained with Zombie NIR fixable viability dye (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA) and the following fluorochrome‐conjugated monoclonal antibodies on the cell surface: anti‐CD3 (clone UCHT1, Alexa Fluor 700), anti‐CD4 (clone SK3, BV510), anti‐CD8 (clone RPA‐T8, PerCP‐Cy5.5), anti‐CD14 (clone 63D3, APC‐Cy7) and anti‐CD19 (clone HIB19, APC‐Cy7). After fixation and permeabilisation using the FoxP3 transcription factor staining buffer set (eBioscience, Thermo Fisher Scientific), the cells were stained for intracellular IFN‐γ using a monoclonal anti‐IFN‐γ antibody (clone 4S.B3, PE‐Dazzle594). All antibodies were purchased from BioLegend. The cells were acquired on a LSRFortessa II cytometer (BD) using FACSDiva version 8 for Windows (BD). The full gating strategy is reproduced in Supplementary figure 14.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Cytotoxicity Evaluation of CBD and CBG

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cytotoxicity of CBD and CBG was evaluated by flow cytometry with propidium iodide according to the protocol of Riccardi and Nicoletti (2016) [30 (link)] with minimal modifications. For all tests, CBD and CBG were used with a purity of 99.9%. CBD and CBG were reconstituted in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, Thermo Scientific™) at a concentration of 0.01% and evaluated between 0.5 µM and 20 µM based on previous reports in the literature [31 (link)]. CBD and CBG compounds were tested at concentrations of 0.5, 1, 3, 10, and 20 µM at 3, 6, and 12 h. The positive control was 100 µM hydrogen peroxide, and the negative control was DMSO (0.01%).
A suspension of 1 × 106 cells (PLF) in 1 mL PBS in 12 × 75 mm tubes (Biolife, Bothell, WA, USA) was centrifuged at 200× g for 5 min at room temperature, the PBS was removed, and the cell pellet was resuspended in 1 mL of fluorochrome solution (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Tubes were placed in the dark at 4 °C before flow cytometry for at least 1 h and no more than 24 h. The LSR Fortessa II cytometer (Becton Dickinson) with a 488 nm laser line was used for excitation. Red fluorescence (>600 nm) and dispersion were measured, collecting at least 20,000 events. The FlowJo® 8.7 software (Tree Star, Inc., Ashland, OR, USA) was used to carry out the analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Cytokine Profiling of CBD and CBG in Fibroblasts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cytokine quantification was performed using the LEGENDplex kit (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA) Ref 740930. CBD and CBG at 0,5, 1, 3, 10, 20 uM concentrations were added to PLF cultures at 3, 6, and 12 h and the production of IL-2, CXCL10, IL-1β, TNF-α, and CCL2, IL-17 A, CXCL8, IL12p70, IL-6, IFN-γ, IL-10, TGF-β, and IL-4 were measured. The negative control was cell culture supernatant of periodontal ligament fibroblasts in base medium (DMEM) with DMSO at a concentration of 0.01%. The LSR Fortessa II cytometer (Becton Dickinson) was used, and the results were generated by the LENGENDplex Data Analysis Software v8.0 (BioLegend, USA). The protocol used was the one provided by the manufacturer. The cytometer reading was simultaneous for all conditions [32 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Flow Cytometry for CAR123 Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flow cytometry was performed as previously described (74 ). Anti-human antibodies were purchased from BioLegend, eBioscience, or Becton Dickinson. For cell number quantitation, Countbright (Invitrogen) beads were used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. In all analyses, the population of interest was gated based on forward vs. side scatter characteristics followed by singlet gating, and live cells were gated using Live Dead Fixable Aqua (Invitrogen). Time gating was included for quality control. Detection of CAR123 was performed using goat-anti-mouse antibody (Jackson Laboratories) or CD123-Fc/His (Sino Biologicals) and anti-His-APC (R&D) or PE (AbCam) or directly PE-conjugated CD123 protein (Sino Biologicals and AbCam). Flow cytometry was performed on a four-laser Fortessa-LSR II cytometer (Becton-Dickinson) and analyzed with FlowJo X 10.0.7r2 (Tree Star).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!