The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

65 protocols using 0.22 μm pore filter

1

Preparation of Fucoidan Solution

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fucoidan was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Fucoidan powder was dissolved in phosphate buffer saline (PBS), then sterilized using a 0.22 μm pore filter (Millipore, Billerica, MA) and stored at 4 °C until use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Lipid-Based Methotrexate Nanoemulsion Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LDE-MTX was prepared from a lipid mixture composed of 100 mg cholesteryl oleate, 200 mg egg phosphatidylcholine (Lipoid, Germany), 10 mg triglycerides, 12 mg cholesterol and 60 mg of MTX (5 (link),19 (link)). The aqueous phase (100 mg of polysorbate 80 and 10 mL of Tris-HCl buffer, pH 8.05) was kept at room temperature. The pre-emulsion was obtained adding the hydrophilic phase to the oil phase by ultrasonic radiation until complete dissolution of the drug. Emulsification of the compounds was obtained by high-pressure homogenization using an Emulsiflex C5 homogenizer (Avestin, Canada). After homogenization at constant temperature, the nanoemulsion was centrifuged at 1800 g for 15 min at 4°C to separate the emulsified from unbound MTX. The nanoemulsion was sterilized by passage through 0.22 μm pore filter (Millipore, USA) and kept at 4°C until it was used. The association of MTX to LDE was measured by HPLC before the treatment (22 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Isolation of Serum Exosomes by Centrifugation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Exosomes were isolated from serum samples by differential centrifugation combined with filtering, as described in a previous study, with minor modifications (15 (link)). Briefly, 500 μl of serum samples were thawed on ice, and then these samples were diluted in 15 ml PBS followed by filtering through a 0.22-μm pore filter (Millipore) and subsequent ultracentrifugation at 150,000g for 3 h at 4 °C using a 70 Ti rotor (Beckman Coulter). Afterward, the pellet was washed in 15 ml PBS, and a second ultracentrifugation step was carried out at 150,000g for 3 h at 4 °C. Finally, the pellet was resuspended in 100 μl PBS and stored at −80 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Isolation and Characterization of Exosomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Five micrometers GW4869 (Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA) was added to the cells for culture if necessary, and exosomes were isolated from the cell culture supernatant by differential centrifugation. In brief, 2.5 × 106 HCC cells were seeded in 150 mm dishes and allowed to recover for 24 h. Then, the cells were washed twice with prewarmed phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and the culture medium was replaced with exosome-free medium supplemented with 10% exosome-depleted FBS. After 2 days of culture, the conditioned medium from cells reaching ~ 90% confluence was harvested and subjected to serial centrifugations for 10 min at 500 g and 30 min at 16500 g, followed by filtration through a 0.22 μm pore filter (Millipore). The filtrated medium was ultracentrifuged at 110000 g for 70 min to harvest exosomes. The exosome pellet was washed with PBS and then collected by ultracentrifugation at 110000 g for 70 min on a 40% w/v sucrose cushion. The floating exosomes were collected and pelleted again by ultracentrifugation at 110000 g for 70 min. High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM) of the exosomes was carried out with a JEOL 2010 microscope (Akishima, Japan) at 200 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Isolation and Purification of Exosomes from Cell Cultures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Exosomes were isolated from cell supernatants by differential centrifugation as described in a previous study, with minor modifications (15 (link)). Cells were cultured in T225 (225 cm2) flasks in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% FBS until they reached a confluency of 80%, after which cells were grown in serum-free medium for 2 days. Next, supernatants were collected and centrifuged for 10 min at 1000g to remove cell contamination, followed by centrifugation for 30 min at 10,000g to remove apoptotic bodies and cellular debris, after which the media were filtered using a 0.22-μm pore filter (Millipore). Finally, exosomes were collected by ultracentrifugation for 2 h at 100,000g (45 Ti rotor; Beckman), followed by washing in 70 ml PBS and ultracentrifugation for 2 h at 100,000g to produce pellets.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Fluorescent Labeling of PEDV Viruses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PEDVs were labeled with a lipophilic cationic dye, 1,1′-dioctadecyl-3,3,3′,3′-tetramethylindodicarbocyanine (DiD; Thermo Fisher, USA). A final concentration of 250 μM DiD dye was used to label the purified viruses, and it was first incubated at room temperature for 90 min with a soft vortex to ensure sufficient partition of DiD dye into the viral envelope (23 (link), 24 (link), 42 (link)). Next, excess dyes were removed using a NAP-10 filtration column (GE Healthcare). Finally, DiD-labeled PEDVs were filtered through a 0.22-μm pore filter (Millipore), aliquoted, and stored at −80°C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Cigarette Smoke Extract Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CSE was prepared as previously described (Xu et al., 2018 (link)). Briefly, a vacuum suction device was used to draw smoke from Marlborough cigarettes (Philip Morris, United States) into glass tubes containing 10 mL of room-temperature Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) (Gibco, United States) at a constant speed. Each cigarette was continuously aspirated for 5 min. The resulting CSE solution was added to a 96-well Costar plate (200 mL of solution per well) and the absorbance was measured at 320 nm with a microplate reader (Spark®, Tecan, Mannedorf, Switzerland). The optical density of the CSE was adjusted to 1.0 in DMEM, and the resultant CSE solution was considered as 100% CSE. The diluted solution was then sterilized with a 0.22 μm pore filter (Millipore, United States). The sterilized solution was further diluted in serum-free medium to the concentrations required for the experiments described below. Dilutions occurred within 1 h of sterilization.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Isolation and Characterization of Therapeutic hucMSC-Derived Small Extracellular Vesicles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Small extracellular vesicles derived from hucMSCs were isolated and purified as described previously (Wu et al., 2021 (link)). Cell supernatants were collected and centrifuged at 1,500 × g for 20 mins to remove cell debris and then centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 30 min. Next, the sEVs were concentrated with a 100 kDa molecular weight cutoff ultrafiltration membrane (MWCO) (Millipore, Billerica, MA, United States). Subsequently, the concentrated solution from the upper tube was collected for ultracentrifugation at 100,000 g for 70 min at 4°C to pellet the hucMSC-sEVs. Then pellet containing sEVs was resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and centrifuged again at 100,000 g for 70 min. Finally, the pelleted sEVs were washed and gathered from the bottom of the tube with PBS. sEVs were finally filtered with a 0.22 μm pore filter (Millipore, Billerica, Massachusetts, United States) and stored at −80°C. The diameter of the concentrated sEVs was determined by nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) (NanoSight, Amesbury, United Kingdom). sEVs were also identified morphologically by transmission electron microscopy (FEI Tecnai 12, Philips, Netherlands). Western blotting was also used to confirm the presence of characteristic markers of sEVs (CD81, HSP70, and Alix).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Isolation and Characterization of Gastric Cancer Exosomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Exosomes were isolated from the conditioned medium of gastric cancer cells as previously described [29 (link)]. In brief, cells were cultured in exosome-depleted medium and the supernatants were collected after 48 h. The conditioned medium was centrifuged at 1,000 g for 10 min to remove cell debris followed by 30 min at 10,000 g using 100 KDa MWCO before the concentrated solutions were filtrated through a 0.22-μm pore filter (Millipore, Shanghai, China). Exosomes were precipitated by adding the exosome quick extraction solution (System Biosciences, Palo Alto, CA, USA) at a ratio of 1:5 at 4 oC for 12 h. Exosomes were dissolved with PBS and stored at -80 oC. Protein concentration was determined by BCA protein assay kit (ThermoFisher Scientific, Shanghai, China). The size and concentration of exosomes were measured by Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (NTA). The morphology of purified exosomes was identified by transmission electron microscopy (Tecnai 12; Philips) and the expression of exosomal markers CD9 and CD81 by western blot.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Isolation and Purification of Exosomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Exosomes were isolated and purified as described previously [25 (link)]. Cell-conditioned medium with 10% FBS in which bovine exosomes and protein aggregates were removed by ultracentrifugation at 10000 ×g for 16 h at 4°C. Following 48 h culture, cell supernatants were collected and centrifuged at 2000 ×g for 20 min to remove cell debris and then centrifuged at 1000 ×g for 30 min using a 100 kDa molecular weight cutoff ultrafiltration membrane (MWCO) (Millipore, Billerica, Massachusetts, USA) to concentrate. After that, the concentrated supernatants were loaded upon a 30% sucrose/D2O cushion and ultracentrifuged at 100000 ×g for 2 h at 4°C. Exosomes were gathered from the bottom of the tube and washed with PBS for three times by centrifugation at 1000 ×g for 30 min using a 100 kDa MWCO (Millipore, Billerica, Massachusetts, USA). Exosomes were finally filtrated on a 0.22 μm pore filter (Millipore, Billerica, Massachusetts, USA) and stored at −80°C. Concentration of concentrated exosomes was determined by nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) (NanoSight, Amesbury, U.K.). Exosomes were also identified by transmission electron microscopy (FEI Tecnai 12, Philips, Netherlands) for the morphology and the size and ImageStreamX Imaging Flow Cytometer (Amnis, WA, USA) for exosomal markers, CD9 and CD63.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!