The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

17 protocols using chloramphenicol

1

Salmonella Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibiotic susceptibility profiling of the Salmonella isolates was determined by Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method [16 (link)]. Seven different antibiotics were used in this study, namely, tetracycline (30 μg), chloramphenicol (30 μg), trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole (25 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), nalidixic acid (30 μg), ampicillin (10 μg), and ceftriaxone (30 μg) (Mast Group Ltd, Merseyside, UK). Antimicrobial susceptibility was done on Muller Hinton agar (Mast Group Ltd, Merseyside, UK) and Escherichia coli ATCC 25329 control strain was used. The diameter of zonal clearance was measured in millimeters and results were recorded as susceptible (S), intermediate (I), and resistant (R) according to CLSI, performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing [17 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antimicrobial Resistance Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All isolates were examined for resistance to routine antimicrobial agents by standard disk diffusion method using Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923) and Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922) as control strains (17 ). The antibiotics tested were gentamicin, amikacin, ceftazidime, ceftizoxime, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, imipenem, ciprofloxacin, co-trimoxazole, chloramphenicol, penicillin, oxacillin, ampicillin, vancomycin, rifampicin and erythromycin (Mast Co, the UK). Isolates showing intermediate levels of susceptibility were classified as nonsusceptible.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiling of Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The samples were tested for their susceptibility against a panel of 11 antibiotics by using a standard disc diffusion method46 (link). The antibiotics tested were the following: oxacillin (1 µg), gentamicin (10 µg), mupirocin (20 µg), amoxicillin (10 µg), erythromycin (15 µg), tetracycline (10 µg), cefoxitin (30 µg), cefepime (30 µg), fusidic acid (10 µg), penicillin (1 unit) and chloramphenicol (30 µg) (Mast Group, Merseyside, UK). Antibiotic profiles of each isolate ware determined according the recommendation of the Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (BSAC)46 (link),47 .
In addition, the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) for oxacillin and cefoxitin were determined using E-tests (Biomerieux, Basingstoke, UK)46 (link),47 .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antimicrobial Resistance Profiling of K. pneumoniae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Eight K. pneumoniae isolates were received from the Medical Microbiology laboratories of three hospitals in Armenia between January 2019 and August 2019. All isolates were recovered from various clinical specimens (urine, sputum, throat, blood, and stool) of hospitalized patients. The isolates were identified using a matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS) as described previously (59 (link)).
All isolates were tested using a disk diffusion method for susceptibility to a panel of 11 antibiotics, including ampicillin (10 mg), piperacillin-tazobactam (30/6 mg), amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (20 and 10 mg, respectively), ceftazidime (10 mg), cefepime (30 mg), norfloxacin (10 mg), levofloxacin (5 mg), amikacin (30 mg), imipenem (10 mg), meropenem (10 mg), and chloramphenicol (30 mg) (Mast Group, Merseyside, United Kingdom) according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing protocol (EUCAST v.6.0, 2017) (60 ). The antibiotics chosen were those most frequently used in clinical settings in Armenia. Isolates resistant to three or more antibiotic classes were considered multidrug resistant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The methicillin resistance of 40 S. aureus isolates were tested by using the Oxacillin agar screen method on the Muller Hinton agar modified by adding NaCl (4 %) + Oxacillin (6 µg/ml) (Dhanalakshmi et al. 2012 ). The strains that could grow on this medium were then tested to be revealed whether they carry the mecA gene (Kot et al. 2020 (link); Ubukata et al. 1989 (link)), as described in the next section.
The disc diffusion method was conducted to determine the antibiotic resistance pattern of the identified methicillin-resistant S. aureus strains to Vancomycin (30 µg), Ciprofloxacin (5 µg), Erythromycin (15 µg), Tetracycline (30 µg), Gentamycin (10 µg), Ceftriaxone (30 µg), Amikacin (30 µg), Mupirocin (5 µg), Oxacillin (30 µg), Chloramphenicol (30 µg) and Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole (1.25/23.75 µg) purchased from MAST Group, Merseyside, UK.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed by using Kirby–Bauer disc diffusion method according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute recommendations (CLSI) [8 ]. The antimicrobial disks tested were ampicillin (AMP), cefoxitin (FOX), cefazolin (CFZ), ceftriaxone (CRO), cefotaxime (CTX), ceftazidime (CAZ), cefepime (FEP), amoxicillin-clavulanate (AMC), aztreonam (ATM), gentamicin (GEN), streptomycin (STR), amikacin (AMK), nalidixic acid (NAL), ofloxacin (OFX), ciprofloxacin (CIP), levofloxacin (LVX), chloramphenicol (CHL), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX), tetracycline (TET), azithromycin (AZM), imipenem (IPM) and meropenem (MEM) (Mast Co., Bootle, Merseyside, UK). Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 was used as the quality control strain. The MDR was defined as resistance to 3 or more unrelated antibiotics [9 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Genetic Determinants of Antimicrobial Resistance

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genetic determinants for AMR were identified using staramr v0.5.1 (https://github.com/phac-nml/staramr) against the ResFinder78 (link) and PointFinder79 (link) databases. Phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using the EUCAST disk diffusion method80 (link) (Antibiotic disks; ampicillin 10 μg, chloramphenicol 30 μg and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole 25 μg from Mast Group). To compare the results of genotypic against phenotypic testing, sensitivity and specificity were calculated for first line agents used over the study period using MedCalc’s test evaluation calculator with Clopper-Pearson confidence intervals (https://www.medcalc.org/calc/diagnostic_test.php).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiling of E. coli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antimicrobial susceptibility test was done with the disk diffusion method (Bauer et al, 1966) using Mueller–Hinton agar (Difco). Initially, an emulsion of sample in saline solution was prepared by adjustment to the 0.5 McFarland turbidity standards. The susceptibility of the E. coli strains was tested in relation to several antibiotics, including: chloramphenicol (CAF) (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), gentamycin (10 μg), trimethoprim (1.25 μg-sulfamethoxazole 23.75 μg), erythromycin (15 μg), streptomycin (10 μg) and tetracycline (30 μg) (Mast Group Ltd., Merseyside, UK). Using sterile tweezers, commercially available antibiotic disks were placed individually on the surface of Mueller-Hinton agar. After 24 h of incubation at 35°C, the strains were scored as “susceptible”, “intermediate”, or “resistant” to each antibiotic based on the measurement of the inhibition zone, as recommended by clinical laboratory standard institute (CLSI).26
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Antibiotic Susceptibility of Sorbitol-Negative Strains

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The sorbitol-negative strains were examined for resistance against ampicillin (10 µg), cephalothin (30 µg), ceftazidime (30 µg), gentamicin (10 µg), doxycycline (30 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg), nalidixic acid (30 µg), cotrimoxazole (25 µg), and chloramphenicol (30 µg) (MAST Group Ltd., UK), using Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion susceptibility test and the characterization of strains as susceptible, reduced susceptibility or resistant was as recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) (14 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing by Disk Diffusion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antimicrobial susceptibility test was performed using the disk diffusion method, in Muller-Hinton agar (MHA, Merck, Germany) plate. The antibiotics disc tested based on the minimal growth inhibitory zone diameter were nalidixic acid (NA = 30 μg), ciprofloxacin (Cip = 5 μg), ofloxacin (OF = 5 μg), chloramphenicol (CL = 30 μg), cefotaxime (30 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg) and aztreonam (AZT = 30 μg) (Mast Group, Bootle, UK) [13 (link)]. The results were interpreted as resistant, intermediate or sensitive, in accordance with the guidelines of the CLSI (2015) and the manufacturer protocols [4 (link)]. The strains used for quality control were E. coli ATCC 25922 and Enterococcus fecalis ATCC 29212.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!