The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

11 protocols using kod plus high fidelity dna polymerase

1

Standard DNA Manipulation Protocols for E. coli and S. cerevisiae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
General DNA manipulations in E. coli or S. cerevisiae were performed according to standard methods [64 , 65 ]. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was conducted using high-fidelity DNA polymerase KOD plus according to the manufacturer’s instruction (TOYOBO, Japan). The oligonucleotide primers used in this study are listed in Additional file 1: Table S3. Purification of DNA fragments was performed using PCR Clean-up kit or DNA Gel Extraction kit (Axygen scientific Inc., USA). Total RNA was isolated from yeast cells by using the hot phenol method [65 ]. Gene transcription was analyzed by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) using the Quant one-step qRT-PCR kit (SYBR Green) and LightCycler 96 System (Roche, Switzerland). Data were processed by the second-derivative maximum method of LightCycler 96 software SW1.1 with housekeeping gene ACT1 as a control to calculate the relative transcription level of each target gene.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Standard DNA Manipulation Protocols in E. coli and S. cerevisiae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
General DNA manipulations in E. coli or S. cerevisiae were performed according to standard methods38 39 . Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was conducted using high fidelity DNA polymerase KOD plus according to the manufacturer′s instruction (TOYOBO, Japan). Purification of DNA fragments was performed using PCR Clean-up kit or DNA Gel Extraction kit (Axygen scientific Inc, USA). DNA sequencing was completed by Shanghai Invitrogen Biological Technology CO., LTD. Total RNA was isolated by using the hot phenol method38 . Gene expression was analyzed by qRT-PCR using the Quant one-step qRT-PCR kit (SYBR Green) with ACT1 as a control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Transgenic Construct Assembly Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
mig-13 promoter (DA9 promoter), unc-104 promoter (pan-neuronal promoter), arl-8 cDNA and unc-104 cDNA were described previously [14 (link), 16 (link), 17 (link), 23 (link)]. sam-4, rab-3, rab-7, and kxd-1 cDNA were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) from worm cDNA obtained from N2 strain. blos-9 and laat-1 genomic DNA was amplified by PCR from N2 genomic DNA. PCR was performed using KOD-plus- high fidelity DNA polymerase (TOYOBO, Tokyo, Japan). These DNA fragments were assembled on the pSM vector (with GFP fusion, obtained from Cori Bargmann, Rockefeller University) or ΔpSM vector (without GFP fusion, obtained from Cori Bargmann).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

C. elegans Dendritic Morphology Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

C. elegans was maintained using standard procedures48 (link). unc-33(ky880); kyIs445 and Pdes-2::unc-33L were described previously13 (link). Mutations were introduced to the Pdes-2::unc-33L plasmid by PCR-based mutagenesis with KOD-plus high fidelity DNA polymerase (TOYOBO, Tokyo, Japan). Injections were performed as described49 (link). In short, wild type and mutant unc-33 plasmids (10 ng/μl) and Podr-1::DsRed (50 ng/μl) were injected to unc-33(ky880); KyIs445 mutant worms. DsRed positive worms were transferred to new plates and stable transmission of the extrachromosomal array was determined. For rescue experiments, only DsRed positive worms were observed and analyzed by LSM710 confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss).
For the statistical analysis of the dendritic phenotype, worms were observed in a blind fashion. The observer did not know genotypes until the end of the test. Each worm was classified as “wild type” or “unc-33” by the synaptic vesicle localization. 100 worms were observed for each genotype and plotted as bar graphs. For the quantification of axonal fluorescent intensity, worms were observed in the same manner as the dendritic analysis. The mean fluorescent intensity was measured using Image J (NIH). A 100-μm region of the axon was selected randomly to measure the mean fluorescent intensity.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Transgenic Worm Lines via pSM Vector

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Expression plasmids for transgenic worm lines were made using the pSM vector (C. Bargmann), a derivative of pPD49.26 (A. Fire). The mig-13 promoter was cloned between SphI/AscI, and C.elegans unc-43 isoform d or human CAMK2α was cloned between NheI/KpnI or AscI/NheI, respectively. P.H466Y and p.H477Y mutations were introduced by PCR-based mutagenesis using KOD-plus- high fidelity DNA polymerase (TOYOBO, Tokyo, Japan). Transgenic worms were generated as described (Mello, 1995 (link)). Plasmids were injected into animals at 10 ng/μl (in the case of Pmig-13::unc-43) and 50 ng/μl (in the case of Pmig-13::CAMK2α) together with coinjection markers at 90 ng/μl.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase Reaction Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All chemicals were purchased from Nacalai Tesque (Tokyo, Japan) or Wako Pure Chemical (Tokyo, Japan) unless otherwise specified. KOD Plus high-fidelity DNA polymerase was purchased from Toyobo (Tokyo, Japan). Restriction enzymes and the DNA ligation kits used were from Takara (Shiga, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

5' RACE for traJ Transcript Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5′RACE was performed according to the method described in Bensing et al. (1996) (link). Briefly, 6 μg of total RNA was treated with 75 U of tobacco pyrophosphatase (TAP; Nippon Gene) at 37°C for 30 min in the presence of 20 U of RNaseOUT. The TAP-treated and -untreated RNA samples were mixed with the RNA oligonucleotide (5′-AUAUGCGCG AAUUCCUGUAGCUAGAAGAAA-3′) and ligated by 40 U of T4 RNA ligase (TAKARA Bio) at 16°C overnight. The ligated RNA samples were mixed with 1 pmol of gene-specific primer traJ-R2 (5′-TCTCTTCGATCTTCGCCAGC-3′) and reverse transcribed by 100 U of SuperScriptIII at 50°C for 60 min in the presence of 20 U of RNaseOUT. The cDNA fragment spanning the ligated RNA oligonucleotide and the 5′ end of traJ transcript was amplified by KOD-Plus high-fidelity DNA polymerase (TOYOBO) using primers Oligo-F1 (5′-TATGCGCGAATTCCTGTAGC-3′) and traJ-R. The amplified fragment was cloned into HincII-digested pBluescript II SK(-) vector (Stratagene), and the inserts from several clones were sequenced using M13 primers.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Mutate Arginine to Alanine in ASP

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To substitute the arginine residue at position 566 (Arg-566) of ASP to the alanine residue, we site-directly mutated asp on pSA19-5528 according to the polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based one-step mutagenesis method [20 (link),21 (link)]. The PCR was carried out using KOD plus high-fidelity DNA polymerase (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan). The primers 5′-ctctctgctcaatgccgagacccgtgag-3′ and 5′- ctcacgggtctcggcattgagcagagag-3′ were used for mutation of the target gene. The mutation was verified by DNA sequencing. The plasmid thus obtained was designated pSA19-5528[R566A].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Virus Genomic and Transcriptomic Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Virus genomic DNA was extracted by using the QIAamp DNA Blood MiniKit (Qiagen). The genomic region of each gene was amplified using KOD-plus high-fidelity DNA polymerase (Toyobo) and given primer sets (#5-8). The identities of PCR products were confirmed by direct DNA sequencing. Total RNA was extracted from virus-infected cells using TRIzol (Life Technologies), and reverse transcription was performed with 1 μg total RNA using random primers and AMV Reverse Transcriptase (Promega) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Quantitative PCR was performed with SsoAdvanced™ Universal SYBR® Green (Promega) and given primer sets (#9-11) using an Applied Biosystems 7500 Real-Time PCR System (Life Technologies).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Cloning of SUV420H1 and SUV420H2

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human SUV420H1 and SUV420H2 cDNAs were amplified from HBL-100 cDNA and inserted into the XhoI/BamHI sites and EcoRI/BamHI sites of vector pEGFP-C1, respectively. PCR reactions were performed using KOD Plus high-fidelity DNA polymerase (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan). All cDNA constructs were verified by DNA sequencing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!