The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Immunocard toxins a b assay

Manufactured by Meridian Bioscience
Sourced in United States

The ImmunoCard toxins A&B assay is a rapid qualitative test used to detect the presence of Clostridium difficile toxins A and B in human stool specimens. The assay is designed to provide a quick and reliable method for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

3 protocols using immunocard toxins a b assay

1

Clostridium difficile Recurrence and FMT

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Recurrence of CDI was defined as patients with a primary diagnosis ≥3 loose stools and positive test results for toxins using the ImmunoCard toxins A&B assay (Meridian Bioscience, Cincinnati, OH, USA) or real-time PCR (Cepheid Xpert C. difficile/Epi, Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA) followed by an adequate response to treatment (absence of diarrhea, leukocytosis, and abdominal pain at the end of treatment) and developed new diarrhea (≤3 loose stools) within 8 weeks after treatment.
CDI resolution was considered by the absence of diarrhea, leukocytosis, and abdominal pain at the end of treatment. A new FMT was administrated if after 72 h from the first dose, the patient had an inadequate clinical response deemed as a reduction of less than 50% bowel movements and failure to improve consistency of stool.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Hospital-Acquired Clostridium difficile Infection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patients included in the study were adults with a suspected diagnosis of CDI who reported ≥3 bowel movements with loose stools (Bristol 5–7) in the preceding 24 h. For CDI confirmation at least one of the following tests had to be positive: detection of toxins using the ImmunoCard toxins A&B assay (Meridian Bioscience, Cincinnati, OH, USA) in stools, real-time PCR (Cepheid Xpert C. difficile/Epi, Cepheid, Sunnyvale CA) in stools, or an endoscopic image consistent with pseudomembranous colitis. All hospitals used the same diagnostic methods with the exception of GEA and INCAN where no PCR-testing was performed. At the time of the study, none of the hospitals used glutamate deshidrogenase test (GDH).
CDI was classified as hospital-onset healthcare facility-associated CDI (HO-HCFA) when patients had been in-hospital for at least 48 h and were CDI free at admission, or as community-onset health care facility-associated (CO-HCFA) when patients were hospitalized for at least 48 h during the previous 12 weeks at CDI onset.11 (link) Data on community-acquired CDI was very limited, with no cases included. Treatment failure was defined as persistence of diarrhea after five days of treatment.12
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Retrospective Study of CDI Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We performed a retrospective review of hospitalized patients with a diagnosis of CDI between January 1, 2011 to September 30, 2015, who underwent abdominal CT within 72 h of diagnosis. The study was performed at the University Hospital “Dr. José Eleuterio González”, a 450-bed tertiary care hospital in Monterrey, Mexico.
Patients included were 18 years or older, and the diagnosis was determined by the Immunocard toxins A&B assay (Meridian Bioscience, Cincinnati, OH, USA), positive PCR (Cepheid XpertC. difficile/Epi) or presence of pseudomembranous colitis on colonoscopy.
Clinical data was collected from the time of diagnosis and throughout hospitalization. The primary outcome was defined as fulminant colitis with colectomy, and the secondary outcome was all-cause mortality within 30 days of diagnosis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!