The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Ver 3

Manufactured by Arlequin

Arlequin ver. 3.5 is a software package for the analysis of genetic data. It provides a comprehensive set of tools for population genetics and molecular ecology studies, including methods for the estimation of genetic diversity indices, the detection of population structure, and the inference of demographic parameters.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

45 protocols using ver 3

1

Y-Chromosomal Polymorphisms in Brown Bears

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pairwise population differentiation values (RST) for Y-chromosomal polymorphisms [48 (link)] were calculated with 1000 permutations by using Arlequin ver 3.5.2.2 [44 (link)]. Hierarchical analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) was implemented in Arlequin ver 3.5.2.2. Geographical partitioning of Y-chromosomal polymorphisms was also tested by AMOVA, with partitions defined as the North American, Eurasian, Hokkaido, and Etorofu groups. Based on a preliminary AMOVA analysis, the Etorofu population was included in the Eurasian group for further analyses. The three populations in the Hokkaido group (central, eastern, and southern) were defined by mtDNA lineages as described above. Brown bear populations represented by only one individual (Tibet, Sakhalin, and Kunashiri) were excluded from the AMOVA analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Phylogenetic Analysis of mtDNA and Y-STRs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The mtDNA sequences were aligned using MEGA X (Kumar et al., 2018) (link) together with sequences of other Asian populations downloaded from the NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information) database. Net genetic distances (d A ) between populations were calculated from these sequences under the Tamura-Nei model (Tamura & Nei, 1993) (link) with gamma distribution. Phylogenetic networks between populations based on d A distances were constructed in the Neighbor-Net method (Bryant & Moulton, 2004 (link)) by using SplitsTree4 (Huson & Bryant, 2006) (link). Pairwise F ST between regions and nucleotide diversities within each population were calculated by using Arlequin ver 3.5.2.2 (Excoffier & Lischer, 2010) (link), and Tajima's D (Tajima, 1989) within each population were calculated using DnaSP 5.10 (Librado & Rozas, 2009) (link). The probabilities of Tajima's D were computed through 5,000 coalescence simulations.
We aligned the Y-STR sequences using MEGA X and counted the number of repeats. Pairwise RST between regions was calculated by using Arlequin ver 3.5.2.2 as well as gene diversities.
Fisher's exact test was used to compare the allele frequencies of the SNPs between populations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Genetic Diversity Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All sequences were initially aligned and edited manually using Mega 5 (Tamura et al., 2011) (link). Multiple sequence alignment was done using ClustalW, as implemented in Mega 5 (Tamura et al., 2011) (link). DnaSP ver. 6 (Rozas et al., 2017) (link), was use to calculated the number of segregated sites (S), number of haplotypes (H), haplotype diversity (Hd), and nucleotide diversity (π). In addition, neutrality tests including Tajima's D and Fu's Fs were estimated for each population using Arlequin Ver 3.5 (Excoffier and Lischer, 2010) (link). To describe the relationship among haplotypes, a Minimum Spanning Network (Bandelt et al., 1999) was use to constructed a haplotype network as implemented in PopART version 1.7 (Leigh and Bryant, 2015) (link). To determine between site population structure, ΦST was estimated between each population pair using the software package Arlequin Ver 3.5 (Excoffier and Lischer, 2010) (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Genetic Differentiation Analysis of Geographical Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To validate the phylogenetic trees, we assessed the degree of genetic differentiation among geographical isolates for the targeted genes by calculating an Analysis of Molecular Variance model (AMOVA) and pairwise fixation indices (FST statistic) between samples using Arlequin ver 3.5.2.2 (Excoffier and Lischer, 2010 (link)). A global locus by locus AMOVA, with 1000 permutations, was constructed using the gene sequence data from all 131 samples and variations within and between countries were estimated. In addition, a matrix of FST values, using 100 permutations and a significance level of 0.05, was measured to indicate the level of population divergence, with values ranging from 0 (no evidence of population divergence) to 1 (completely isolated). P-values in both the AMOVA and pairwise FST matrix were calculated to assess the level of significance. For each country, we also tested for positive selection among the gametocyte genes by the codon-based Z-test implemented in MEGA X. The Nei-Gojobori method and a bootstrap procedure of 100 replicates were conducted. To validate the results of Z-test, we further estimated the Tajima’s D statistic using Tajima’s D test and D, D*, F, and F* values using Fu and Li’s tests implemented in DnaSP (Rozas et al., 2017 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Genetic Diversity Analysis with STRs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Allele frequencies, observed heterozygosity (Hobs), and expected heterozygosity (Hexp) were calculated using Microsoft Excel. Likelihood ratio test of linkage disequilibrium (LD) for the syntenic STR loci was performed with Arlequin ver 3.522 (link) (No. of permutations = 10,000, Significance level = 0.05).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Detecting Selection Signatures in SNPs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A coalescence-based simulation was used to detect deviating SNP sites. With these methods, we expected to detect low-level differentiation sites under balanced selection (neutral loci) and high-level differentiation sites under directed selection (differentiation loci). The layering method we used was a modification of the FDIST method that was performed with Arlequin ver 3.5.2.2 [78 (link), 79 (link)].. We used a hierarchical island model with 50,000 simulations to calculate the relationship between the Fst and heterozygosity. A locus with an Fst value higher than the 0.99 limit of the neutral distribution was considered to be a putative outlier under divergent selection [59 (link)]. The remaining loci with nonsignificant Fst values were considered to be neutral SNPs. All procedures reduced bias and maintained highly differentiated loci between ecotypes individuals. We chose Fst values that were higher than the expected neutral distribution as the directional selection sites and Fst values that were lower than the expected neutral distribution as the balanced selection sites [60 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Genetic Diversity Across European Populations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Brownsea Island, Furzey Island, and Isle of Wight sequences were aligned to previously published data and used the British populations as defined by Hale et al. (2004). The final alignment has a length of 238 bp with 72 informative variants from 1,016 samples from across Europe (see references in Table 1). The numbers of haplotypes, haplotype diversity, nucleotide diversity, and neutrality tests were calculated using DNAsp (Librado & Rozas, 2009). FST and AMOVA calculations were performed using Arlequin ver. 3.5.2.2. (Excoffier & Lischer, 2010). A median‐joining haplotype network was constructed in PopART (Leigh & Bryant, 2015), and the Mantel test was calculated using R software and Ade4 package (Dray & Dufour, 2007).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Assessing Historical Demography of Aphid Species

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To examined historical demography of A. craccivora in Thailand, we calculated Tajima’s D (Tajima, 1989 (link)) and Fu’s Fs (Fu, 1997 (link)) neutrality test as an assessment of possible population expansion as a deviation from the neutrality. Both statistics were performed using ARLEQUIN ver 3.5.2.2 (Excoffier and Lischer, 2010 (link)) and significance was assessed with 1,000 bootstrap replicates. A significantly positive value of Tajima’s D indicates population subdivision or population contraction, while a significantly negative value indicates recent population size expansion (e.g., after a bottleneck). Regarding the Fu’s Fs value, a large negative value indicates the excess of rare alleles in the population, which implies a recent increase in population size. Additionally, the Ramos-Onsins and Rozas’s R2 (Ramos-Onsins and Rozas, 2002 (link)) was performed using DNAsp v5.0 program (Librado and Rozas, 2009 (link)) and significance was assessed with 1,000 coalescent simulations. All statistical analyses were performed for each geographical area separately and for each haplotype.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Genetic Diversity Analysis of Populations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All sequences used in analyses were aligned using MEGA 10.0.4 software [53 (link)]. The standard parameters of genetic diversity (the number of haplotypes, the number of polymorphic sites, haplotype diversity, nucleotide diversity, random match probability (RMP) and the mean number of pairwise differences (MPD)) were calculated using Arlequin ver. 3.5.2.2 software [54 (link)]. The RMP parameter is used for expressing the probability that two randomly sampled individuals from a population have a matching genotype and is calculated as the sum of square frequencies [55 (link)]. The MPD is a parameter that represents the measure of differences between all pairs of haplotypes in the sample. The same software was used for assessing genetic differentiation among populations by the analysis of molecular variances (AMOVA) and estimating pairwise population and overall FST values. The statistical significance of all performed tests was assessed with 10,000 permutations. Multi-dimensional scaling (nonmetric MDS) implemented in PAST 3.25 software was used for the visualisation of the matrix of pairwise population FST values [56 ]. Frequencies of different mtDNA haplogroups found in analyzed populations were calculated and used for the PCA to assess the contribution of each haplogroup to the genetic differentiation of the populations. PCA was performed using PAST 3.25 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Phylogenetic Analysis of Bacterial 16S rRNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sequences of the 16S rRNA genes of the studied bacteria were analyzed with the Maximum Likelihood model using the MEGA 6.0 [32 (link)]. To compute the degree of the statistical support for branches in the phylogenetic tree, 1,000 bootstrap replicates were made. For an estimation of the relationships between individual strains of species, represented as nodes, minimum spanning trees (MSTs) were calculated; they consist of nodes connected by edges, the length of which corresponds to the distances between two individuals [33 (link)]. MSTs were calculated on the basis of nucleotide diversity according to the maximum parsimony method with the usage of the Arlequin ver. 3.5.2.2 software package [34 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!