The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Solid phase microextraction fiber

Manufactured by Merck Group
Sourced in United States, Italy

Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) fiber is a sample preparation device used in analytical chemistry. It consists of a fused silica fiber coated with a polymeric stationary phase. The fiber is used to extract and concentrate analytes from a sample matrix, which can then be analyzed using techniques such as gas chromatography or high-performance liquid chromatography.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using solid phase microextraction fiber

1

Volatile Compounds in Minced Meat

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Five grams of minced meat were previously weighed and mixed with 10 mL of a saturated aqueous NaCl solution (360 g/L) and 10 μL of internal standard solution (3-methyl-2-heptanone; 10 μg/L in ethanol) was added. A solid-phase microextraction fiber (divinylbenzene-carboxylic polydimethylsiloxane; length: 1 cm; film thickness: 50/30 m; Sigma-Aldrich, Milan, Italy) was used to perform headspace extraction of volatile compounds (VOC) with an exposure time of 60 minutes at 60 °C. The extracted VOCs were then thermally desorbed in a Clarus 580 gas chromatograph (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with an Elite 5MS column (inner diameter length: 30 × 0.25 mm; film thickness: 0.25 μm; Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) and coupled to a mass spectrometer (SQ8S; Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA). Heating program and identification of VOCs were made as described above [12 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Volatile Compound Analysis of Minced Meat

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Five grams of preventively minced meat were weighed and mixed with 10 mL of an aqueous solution of saturated NaCl (360 g/L). Following a slight homogenization with Ultra-Turrax T-25 (6500 rpm for 15 sec; Janke & Kunkel & Co. IKA Labortechnik, Staufen, Germany) 10 µL of the internal standard solution (3-methyl-2-heptanone; 10 µg/L in ethanol) were added. A solid-phase microextraction fiber (divinylbenzene-carboxen-polydimethylsiloxane; length: 1 cm; film thickness: 50/30 m; Sigma-Aldrich, Milan, Italy) was used to perform the headspace extraction of volatile compounds (VOCs) with an exposition time of 45 min at 55 °C. The extracted VOCs were then thermally desorbed into a Clarus 580 gas chromatograph (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with an Elite-5MS column (length internal diameter: 30 × 0.25 mm; film thickness: 0.25 µm; Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) and coupled with a mass spectrometer (SQ8S; Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA). The setting concerning the thermal program and the VOCs identification were performed as previously described [17 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Headspace SPME Analysis of Bitters

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A 2.5 mL sample of bitters was diluted with 7.5 mL of deionized water in a 20 mL amber glass headspace vial and sealed with a crimp cap having a PTFE-faced silicone lining (Supelco, St. Louis, MO). The sample was shaken at 500 rpm for one minute, after which a Solid Phase Microextraction fiber (2 cm length, 50/30 μm divinylbenzene/carboxen/polydimethylsiloxane coating, Supelco, Bellefonte, PA) was immediately used for extraction. The fiber was exposed to the headspace of the vial for 30 minutes at room temperature, then withdrawn and immediately desorbed in the GC-R inlet.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Detecting Plant-mVOC Interactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To detect whether there was an interaction between plant and mVOCs while co-culturing, part of the co-culture systems (yeast-plant co-culture tubes) that incubated at 20 °C were involved in this experiment. The VOCs present in the co-culture system of plant and yeasts were collected and tested by microextraction and GC-MS, respectively. First, a small hole was drilled in the lid of the co-culture tube (without touch of the suspended Eppendorf tube and A. thaliana) and a pre-cleaned solid-phase microextraction fiber (75 µm, 1 cm, carboxen/polydimethylsiloxane; Supelco, Bellafonte, PA, USA) was inserted into it. The tube was placed vertically at room temperature (about 22°C) for 1.5 days, and then the fibers were taken to the GC-MS for analyte desorption, separation and detection, immediately. The adsorption conditions and operation program of GC-MS were performed the same as described in 2.2. All treatments were performed with three biological replicates and blank control (without yeast inoculation) were also involved in this experiment (n=3). Then, the information of detected VOCs (including the kind, retention time, peak area) would be acquired. Excluding the VOCs detected in blank control or yeast culture, the finial VOCs would be considered as new VOCs for they only be produced while and yeast interacting.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Volatile Flavor Profiling of Muscle Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Volatile flavor compounds were extracted according to Vasta et al. [17 (link)]. Briefly, a muscle sample (5 g) was placed in a 15 mL vial, and a solid-phase microextraction fiber (Supelco, Bellefonte, USA) was exposed over the sample and extracted at 60 °C for 40 min. Then, it was desorbed for 3 min. The gas chromatograph (TRACE 1300, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, USA) settings were as follows: the oven temperature was held at 40 °C for 5 min, increased to 200 °C (5 °C/min), and then ramped at a rate of 20 °C/min to 250 °C. The mass spectra were acquired at 70 eV with a scan range of 30 to 400 m/z. The flavor substances were identified using the NIST MS Search 2.0 database. The relative contents of volatiles were analyzed using the area normalization method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Headspace SPME-GC-MS for Volatile Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The method used for volatile compound analysis was similar to that used in our previous study with some minor modifications (Chen et al., 2021) (link). Samples (sour juice or milk fan, 3 g) were mixed with 100 μL of internal standard (2-octanol, 13 μg/L), and the mixture was transferred to a 20-mL vial. After equilibrating at 60°C for 5 min, a solid-phase microextraction fiber (Supelco Inc., Bellefonte, PA) coated with divinylbenzenecarboxen-polydimethylsiloxane (100 μm in thickness) was exposed to the headspace of a 20-mL vial for 35 min, and the vial was stirred continuously at 250 rpm. The GC temperature protocol was as follows. The initial temperature was 40°C for 4 min, and it was then increased to 100°C at 3°C/min for 2 min, to 150°C at 4°C/min, and finally to 230°C at 10°C/min for 5 min. The aroma components were identified by comparison of their mass spectrometry spectra with NIST17 libraries and comparison of their Kovats retention indices with those reported in the literature (http: / / webbook .nist .gov; Cao et al., 2021) (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Headspace SPME-GC-MS Analysis of Volatile Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fresh samples (0.3 g) were ground in 2 mL potassium phosphate buffer (50 m mol/L Tris and 20 m mol/L NaCl, pH = 8.0) on ice, and then extracted using solid-phase microextraction fiber (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA) coated with an absorbent phase made of polydimethysiloxane/carboxen/divinylbenzene under headspace mode at 40 °C for 50 min with stirring. Vanillin was used as a reference standard. After extraction, the extraction device was inserted into the injection port and maintained for 5 min at 250 °C. Analysis was performed using a Shimadzu QP2010 GC-MS equipped with a vocol column (60 m × 0.32 mm × 0.18 μm, Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA). Helium was used as the carrier gas at a constant flow rate of 0.81 mL/min. The program was set as 35 °C for 3 min, then raised to 40 °C at 3 °C/min and held for 1 min, before finally being raised to 210 °C at 5 °C/min and held for 25 min. The electron ionization system at an ionization energy of 70 eV was used, and the mass spectra scan ranged from m/z 45 to 1000. Identification was conducted based on comparison of molecular weights and mass spectra fragmentation patterns with those recorded in the Nist 147 and Wiley 7 Spectrometry Library data (GC/MS), utilizing previous analyses of pure references that are commercially available.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Headspace GC-MS Analysis of Essential Oil

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We weighed 5 g of essential oil and microcapsules containing the same amount of essential oil into a headspace extraction bottle, placed it in a thermo-static oscillator with a 150 g oscillation frequency, a used solid-phase microextraction fiber (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA) to perform extraction at 60 °C for 40 min, collected the volatile compounds in the LCEO, and analyzed them with GC-MS (QP2010 Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) and a DB-5ms capillary column (Agilent Technologies Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA).The carrier gas was nitrogen, and the flow rate was 1 mL/min. The temperature increase program moved from 40 °C to 180 °C at 5 °C/min, the temperature was maintained at 10 °C/min to 230 °C for 5 min, and the temperature at the injection port was 230 °C. The compounds were identified in the preliminary stage by comparing the mass spectra to real samples from the NIST MS collection [18 (link)]. Normalized quantification was carried out with the peak area of the chromatographic peak of the total ion flow of GC-MS, and the identified components accounted for 99.42% of the total area of the chromatographic peak.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!