The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

51 protocols using mueller hinton agar (mha)

1

Antibiotic Susceptibility of Bacterial Strains

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This study was carried out using the modified Kirby–Bauer disk diffusion test. We used Mueller–Hinton agar (Bio-Rad, Mitry-Mory, France) and two bacterial strains: Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC 29212) and Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 29213). Bacterial inoculum was prepared by diluting the broth culture to match a 0.5 McFarland turbidity standard, which is equivalent to approximately 150 million cells per mL. Using an aseptic technique, each microorganism suspension was streaked across the agar surface, and then 4–6 samples of prosthetic disks from each group were applied to each Petri dish. All Petri dishes were incubated for 24 h at 36 °C, after which the zones (diameter, mm) of microorganism inhibition were measured.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of K. pneumoniae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibiograms (32 molecules) were performed on all isolates of K. pneumoniae using disk diffusion method on Mueller-Hinton agar (Biorad, Marnes-la-Coquette, France). Minimal Inhibitory Concentrations (MICs) to imipenem, imipenem-relebactam, meropenem, meropenem-vaborbactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, piperacillin-tazobactam, aztreonam, cefepime, colistin, amikacin and tobramycin were performed using EUMDROXF Sensititre broth microdilution plates (ThermoFisher Scientific, Dardilly, France) and cefiderocol using UMIC broth microdilution strips (Brucker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) [28 (link),29 (link)].
The MICs of aztreonam-avibactam, aztreonam-tazobactam and aztreonam-clavulanic acid combinations were determined using the Etest strip superposition method as previously described [27 (link)].
The results were interpreted according to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) guidelines as updated in 2023 (https://www.eucast.org/fileadmin/src/media/PDFs/EUCAST_files/Breakpoint_tables/v_13.0_Breakpoint_Tables.pdf). In the absence of breakpoints set for aztreonam-inhibitor combinations, the ones for aztreonam were used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Microbiological Analysis of Wound Specimens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After superficial cleaning of wounds with physiological saline, a specimen was collected by rotating a sterile swab across the surface of the lesion, specifically targeting moist and necrotic areas. The specimens were placed in sterile tubes without transport medium at 4°C immediately after sampling and were processed within 2 h at the Pasteur Institute medical laboratory in Bangui. Sheep blood, chocolate and bromocresol purple agar plates were inoculated, incubated aerobically at 37°C and examined after 24 h and 48 h. Obligate anaerobes were not isolated. Bacterial isolates were identified by standard microbiological methods. Antibacterial drug susceptibility was determined by the disc diffusion method on Mueller–Hinton agar (Bio-Rad, Marnes La Coquette, France), according to the guidelines of the French Society of Microbiology (http://www.sfm-microbiologie.org). Production of ESBL in C3G-R Enterobacteriaceae was detected by the double-disc synergy test [24 (link)] and the MICs of ertapenem by the E-test method (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden). The ertapenem cut-off values were used for categorization. Susceptible strains were defined by MIC ≤ 0.5 mg/L and resistant strains by MIC >1 mg/L. All C3G-R Enterobacteriaceae were kept for further molecular analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Bacterial Identification and Antibiogram Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bacterial identification was performed using the API 20E system (bioMérieux, Marcy-l’Etoile, France). Antibiograms for 32 antibiotics (amoxicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, aztreonam, ceftazidime, cefalotine, cefmandole, cefotaxime, cefepime, cefoxitine, imipenem, meropenem, Moxalactam, pipéracilline, ticarcilline, ticarcilline/acide clavulanique, piperacilline/tazobactam, fosfomycine, colistine, rifampicine, cotrimxazole, ciprofloxacine, pefloxacine; norfloxacine, nalidixic acid, tetracycline, tigecycline, chloramphenicol, kanamycine, amikacine, netilmicine, tobramycine, gentamicine) were determined by the disc diffusion method on Mueller-Hinton agar (BioRad, Marnes-La-Coquette, France) and the susceptibility breakpoints were determined and interpreted as recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute [17 ]. All plates were incubated at 37 °C for 18 h. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of given ß-lactams were determined using the Etest technique (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) for the following β-lactam antibiotics: amoxicillin ± clavulanic acid, cefoxitin, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, aztreonam, cefepime and imipenem. Confirmation of ESBL producers was performed by double disc synergy testing between ticarcillin/clavulanate and aztreonam and/or ceftazidime and/or cefepime [18 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibilities were determined by disk diffusion on Mueller–Hinton agar (Bio-Rad, Marnes-La-Coquette, France) and the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of colistin and doxycycline were determined using the microbroth dilution method. E. coli strain ATCC25922 and P. aeruginosa strain ATCC27853 were used as reference control strains, and the aforementioned tests were performed following the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines [36 ]. Susceptibility was interpreted according to the criteria of the CLSI (M100-S29) [37 ], except for susceptibility to tigecycline, which was interpreted following the FDA criteria (susceptible: ≤2 mg/L; resistant: ≥8 mg/L) for Enterobacteriaceae.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) was performed for all isolates by disk diffusion method on Mueller-Hinton agar (Bio-Rad®, Marnes-la-Coquette, France) according to the criteria of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing1. Antibiotic disks were purchased from Bio-Rad®. Consensus recommendations (Magiorakos et al., 2012 (link)) were used to evaluate the proportion of Multi Drug-Resistant (MDR, not susceptible to at least three antimicrobial groups) and extensively Drug Resistant (XDR, not susceptible to at least six antimicrobial groups) isolates, considering the following six antimicrobial groups: penicillin (ticarcillin, ticarcillin-clavulanate, piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam), cephalosporins (ceftazidime, cefepime), monobactams (aztreonam), carbapenems (imipenem, meropenem), aminoglycosides (gentamicin, tobramycin, amikacin), and fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin). The other isolates – resistant to none, one or two classes of antipseudomonal agents – were defined as non-MDR. The P. aeruginosa strain ATCC 27853 was used as a quality control strain in each experiment.
Of note in a parallel study (Cottalorda et al., unpublished), the antimicrobial resistance profiles, identified for isolates collected from the first urine sample, were also explored for these seven patients.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Antimicrobial and Wound Healing Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For antimicrobial tests: Mueller Hinton agar and potato dextrose agar (PDA) were purchased from Bio-Rad (Bio-Rad, France). For the wounds healing evaluation: Balance rocking, scissors, razor blade, knife blade, pliers, cotton, syringe, beaker, spatula, “Cicaflora®”, physiological serum, HCl (2%) and ether were used too.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Assay Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antimicrobial susceptibility assay of the bacterial strains was performed using agar disc diffusion assay method recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute [9 ]. Commercially available antimicrobial discs (Mast Diagnostics, U.K) of erythromycin (15 µg), gentamicin (10 µg), sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (25 µg), tetracycline (30 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg), azithromycin (15 µg), ampicillin (10 µg), ceftriaxone (30 µg), cefixime (5 µg), and mecillinam (10 µg) were placed on Mueller–Hinton agar (Bio-Rad) seeded with bacteria cultured in their early log phase, as previously described CLSI [9 ]. Following incubation, the plates were examined, and the inhibitory zone diameters for individual antimicrobial agents were measured and recorded as susceptible and resistant based on the breakpoints for respective antibiotic susceptibility of CLSI (CLSI 2010). Organisms resistant to 3 or more classes of antibiotics are designated as MDR. Zone diameter, breakpoints (mm): erythromycin (15 μg) S-I-R: >26, 23–25, <2; gentamicin (10 μg): >15, 13–14, <12; sulfamethoxazole trimethoprim (25 μg): >26, 23–25, <22; tetracycline (30 μg): >26, 23–25, <22; ciprofloxacin (5 μg): >21, 15–20, <14; ampicillin (10 µg): >17,14–16, <13; ceftriaxone (30 μg): >16, 13–15, <12; cefixime (5 μg): >19, 16–18, <15; azithromycin (15 μg): >18, 14–17, <13; mecillinam (10 μg): >15, 12–14, <11.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantifying Bacterial Lung Infection in Rats

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each rat was treated with bronchoalveolar lavage and then was sacrificed in a CO2 chamber and its lungs were aseptically removed and homogenized in 10 mL of normal saline. The homogenates were centrifuged at 2500×g for 10 min, and the pellets were suspended in 2.5 mL of normal saline. The counts of K. pneumonia organisms were obtained after plating serial dilutions of lung homogenates on Mueller–Hinton agar (Bio-Rad, CA, USA). The colonies were counted after 24 h of incubation at 37 °C. The lowest level of detection was 100 CFU/lung, and the rats were considered to be microbiologically cured if they were found to have counts below this level (Vasseur et al., 2014 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibiotic susceptibility was performed by the disc diffusion method on Mueller Hinton agar (Bio-Rad, Marne la Coquette, France) according to the recommendations of the Antibiogram Committee of the French Society for Microbiology (Comité de l’Antibiogramme de la Société Française de Microbiologie) [9 ]. The following antibiotic discs (drug concentration in μg) were tested: amoxicillin (25 μg), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (20/10 μg), ampicillin (10 μg), imipenem (10 μg), cefotaxime (30 μg), ceftriaxone (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), norfloxacin (5 μg), amikacin (30 μg), gentamicin (15 μg) and trimethoprim/ sulfamethoxazole (1.25/23.75 μg), all from Bio-Rad (Bio-Rad, Marne la Coquette, France).
ESBL phenotypes were detected by double-disk synergy according to the method described by Jarlier et al. [10 (link)]. Disks of cefotaxime and ceftriaxone were placed 20 mm from an amoxicillin/clavulanate disk. Enhancement of the inhibition zone of the third-generation cephalosporin toward the amoxicillin/clavulanate disk indicated the possible presence of an ESBL. Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 was used as control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!