The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

23 protocols using vacuum desk 5

1

Bacterial Surface Morphology Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Morphological studies of the bacterial surface were performed by scanning electron microscopy. Cell suspensions were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate buffer, dehydrated in 30%, 50%, 75%, 90% and 100% ethanol three times for 5 min each (spin down in between) and dried in a critical point dryer (EMITECH K850) using a Swinnex filter holder. Filters were then mounted on stubs and sputter-coated with gold (Denton Vacuum Desk V) before observation under a scanning electron microscope (Supra 40 ZEISS; EHT = 5.00 kV, WD = 22 mm, detector in lens).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Scaffold Microstructure Analysis by SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A scanning electron microscope (SEM; S-3500N, Hitachi) was used to observe the sections of individual scaffolds, green state, and postsintering to 1,100°C, which comprise the scaffold. Two scaffolds were mounted onto a small stub and grounded with Graphite Conductive Adhesive 154 (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Fort Washington, PA). The stubs along with the attached section of rods were sputter coated (Denton Vacuum—Desk V, Moorestown, NJ) with a thin gold coating. Scanning electron micrographs were acquired under various magnifications and accelerating voltages.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

E. coli Morphology Analysis via SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To evaluate the effect of the temperature and kanamycin concentration on the morphology of E. coli DH5α-pVAX1-NH36 culture, SEM was performed. For all treatments included in experimental design, 1 mL of culture broth was centrifuged for 10 min at 12,000 rpm and 4 °C. Then, the samples were washed twice with PBS buffer (pH = 7.2) and re-suspended in 1 mL of same buffer. Next, 10 µL of suspension was used to coat a glass slide (1 cm × 1 cm). A fixative was placed on the samples (2.5% glutaraldehyde (v/v) in PBS) overnight, then washed three times with PBS followed by fixation in 1% osmium tetroxide at 4 °C for 2 h.
The fixed cells were washed three times with PBS. Dehydration of samples was achieved by washing with increasing concentrations of ethyl alcohol (70%, 80%, 90% and 100%, Sigma Aldrich, 200 proof, molecular biology grade). Lastly, all samples were freeze-dried (Tousimis, Samdri-795, Rockville, Maryland), then fixed on carbon tape and sputter-coated with gold particles for 2 min (Denton Vacuum Desk V, Los Angeles, CA, USA).
Images were taken by Scanning Electron Microscope JSM-6510LV (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Characterization of CaOx Crystals and PCL-ESM Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CaOx crystals produced through EC on ITO were characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR/ATR) in an Interspec 200-X® (Interspectrum OU, Toravere, Estonia) instrument. The morphologies of the CaOx and PCL-ESM samples were observed by optical microscopy (OM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) in a Nikon Eclipse E400® with the morphometric LAZ program (Image Pro-Plus, Media Cybernetics, Melville, NY, USA) and in a JEOL JSM-IT300LV microscope (JEOL USA Inc., Peabody, MA, USA), respectively. For the SEM analysis, PCL-ESM samples were gold-sputter-coated to thickness of 200 nm using a Denton Vacuum Desk V sputtering system in an argon atmosphere to render them electrically conductive. SEM observation was performed using an accelerating voltage of 20 kV. Moreover, the X-ray diffraction (PXRD) (Siemens, Munich, Germany) of PCL-ESM was conducted using a Siemens D-5000X X-ray diffractometer with CuKα radiation (graphite monochromator) and an ENRAF Nonius FR 590 X-ray generator. The crystal structure of the CaOx was determined using CuKα radiation (40 kV), a step scan of 0.2°, and the geometric Bragg–Brentano (θ-θ) scanning mode with an angle (2θ) in the range of 5–60°. The DiffracPlus program was used as the data control software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Freeze-Dried GelMA Hydrogel Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis, 9% (w/v) GelMA hydrogel was printed on a cut piece of pig skin and photo-crosslinked for 20 s. The sample was then dropped into a liquid nitrogen bath to snap freeze the hydrogel and was immediately placed inside a freeze dryer (FreeZone 2.5 L −50C Benchtop, Labconco) to lyophilize for 24 h. The sample was then broken to expose the cross-section for imaging the internal structure of the hydrogel. The cross-section was mounted on a stub and coated with gold using a sputter coater device (Vacuum Desk V, Denton) for 60 s at 20 mA. A benchtop SEM (TM-1000, HITACHI) was then used to capture the images.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Scanning Electron Microscopy of DCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphological changes observed in B. canis-stimulated human or canine DCs were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy. Briefly, DCs were fixed with 2% glutaraldehyde for 2 h, washed three-times with PBS, dehydrated through immersion in graded ethanol (50, 70, 95 and 100%), and dried at CO2 critical point. Cells were then mounted on aluminium stubs, sputter-coated with gold layer to a thickness of 200 nm (Denton Vacuum Desk V; Moorestown, NJ, USA), and examined in a scanning electron microscope (Jeol JSMIT300LV; Jeol Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) at an accelerating voltage of 20 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterization of Gelatin Nanofibers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The diameter and surface morphology of bovine, porcine, and fish gelatin nanofibers were examined using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) (JEOL, JSM-6610, Japan) operating at 10 kV. Before imaging, the samples were coated with a 1 nm layer of gold (Denton Vacuum, Desk V, United States)28 . The average diameter of the nanofibers was determined by randomly measuring the diameter of 50 individual nanofibers in a unique random sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Membrane Surface Characterization by SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis, the membranes were cut into fragments ~9 mm wide and fixed in aluminum support with the aid of an adhesive tape. The membranes were then subjected to the vacuum metallization process (Denton Vacuum Desk V, Denton Vacuum, Moorestown, New Jersey, United States) and gold sputtering. Then, the specimens were evaluated by SEM (Zeiss, model EVO LS15). Digital images were obtained through the detection of secondary signals of electrons emitted by the samples when exposed to the electron beams. To evaluate the atomic composition of the membranes, an X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) spectrometer (Oxford, model X-act) integrated to the SEM was used, where the chemical analysis was performed by dispersive energy of X-rays for all the elements of the periodic table (except for H, He, Li, and Be). A qualitative elemental analysis was performed to determine the chemical elements within the membranes tested, and the results were expressed in histograms.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Characterizing Melanin Composition via EDX

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The EDX technique allows analyzing the samples qualitatively and quantitatively based on the peak emission of X-rays resulting from the interaction between each element of a compound and the electron beam. Then, the chemical components of the melanin were determined by EDX. Melanin extracts were fixed in glutaraldehyde 2% with 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer during 2 h and then washed once in the same solution. To dehydrate the extracts, they were exposed to increasing alcohol concentrations (50°, 70°, 95°, and 100° for 5 min). Samples were dried using a critical point dryer (Autosamdri®-815, Series A) for 45 min through carbon dioxide (CO2). Once dried, samples were mounted in aluminum sample holders, and then metalized with gold (Denton Vacuum Desk V). Finally, samples were visualized using SEM (JEOL® Model JSM-IT300LV).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Scanning Electron Microscopic Analysis of Jacobsen Catalysts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning electron microscopic (SEM) images of (R,R)-Jacobsen/Cell(NEt2) and (S,S)-Jacobsen/Cell(NEt2) materials were obtained using a JEOL JSM 6610LV microscope located at Laboratório Multiusuário de Microscopia Eletrônica (LAMUME-IF/UFBA, Brazil). To this end, samples were coated with a gold film by controlled deposition, using a Sputter Coater Denton Vacuum Desk V apparatus. Analyses were conducted with an electron beam of 10 keV. The images were processed with a resolution of 2 × 103 magnitudes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!