The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

50 protocols using cotrimoxazole

1

Antimicrobial Resistance Profiling of Virulent Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The isolates positive for at least one virulence marker gene by PCR were subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility test against the selected antimicrobials (ampicillin-10 μg, amikacin-10 μg, chloramphenicol-30 μg, ceftriaxone-10 μg, cephalexin-30 μg, ciprofloxacin-10 μg, co-trimoxazole-25 μg, cefoperazone-tazobactam-75 + 10 μg, meropenem-10 μg, norfloxacin-10 μg, gentamicin-10 μg, cefixime-5 μg, doxycycline hydrochloride-10 μg and ofloxacin-5 μg) (HiMedia, India) by disc diffusion method in Mueller–Hinton agar [18 (link)]. The performance of this test was checked by employing E. coli ATCC 25922 as a standard quality control strain. The results were expressed as sensitive, intermediate and resistant as per standard CLSI guidelines [19 ]. MDR was defined as “acquired non-susceptibility to at least one agent in three or more antimicrobial categories” [20 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed by modified Kirby Bauer's disc diffusion method on Mueller Hinton Agar medium according to the Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute guidelines (CLSI, 2013) . The antibiotics used were ciprofloxacin ((5 µg), cotrimoxazole (25 µg), cefotaxime (30 µg), ceftriaxone (30 µg), cefixime (10 µg), amikacin (30 µg), gentamycin (10 µg), ceftazidime (30 µg), cefoperazone/sulbactum (75/10 µg), meropenem (10 µg), piperacillin/tazobactam (100/10 µg), chloramphenicol (30 µg) (HiMedia, India). Suspension of bacteria maintained to 0.5 McFarland standards was inoculated on Mueller Hinton Agar (HiMedia, India) plates using sterile swabs, and then antibiotic discs were placed on it. The plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 hours. The diameter of the zone of inhibition was measured and compared with standard strain. The results were interpreted as sensitive, intermediate, resistant according to CLSI (2013) guidelines. Pseudomonas (ATCC 27853) was used as standard control strains.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antibiotic Susceptibility of Gram-Negative Bacteria

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The susceptibilities of Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) to the antimicrobial agents ampicillin (10 µg) amoxicillin/clavulanate (30 µg), cefuroxime (30 µg), cefotaxime (30 µg), chloramphenicol (30 µg), cotrimoxazole (25 µg), gentamicin (10 µg), amikacin (30 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg), tetracycline (30 µg) and levofloxacin (5 µg) (HiMedia Laboratories, India) were determined with Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method in accordance with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines [16 ]. Erythromycin (30 µg), oxacillin (30 µg), and vancomycin (30 µg) were included for Gram positive bacteria (GPB). The reference strain E. coli ATCC 25922 and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 10221 were included as quality controls in the susceptibility assays. Relative to the panel of antibiotics tested for each isolate, and according to the international standard definitions for acquired resistance, multidrug resistant (MDR) phenotype was defined as in vitro non-susceptibility to ≥1 agent in ≥3 antimicrobial categories [17 (link)]: penicillins, cephalosporins, beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations, fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides, chloramphenicol, folate pathway inhibitors, tetracyclines, macrolides and glycopeptides.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

MIC Variation Under Gut Conditions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MIC was determined to check the effect of infection-related in vitro gut conditions, such as bile, osmotic, high and low iron, pH and temperature conditions, on MIC variation in resistant and sensitive isolate by using Ezy MIC™ strips of ampicillin, co-trimoxazole, imipenem, nalidixic acid, ciprofloxacin, tetracycline, nitrofurantoin and chloramphenicol (HiMedia Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., Maharashtra, India). Both the isolates were grown up to mid-exponential phase (MEP) under in vitro gut conditions and swabbed onto Muller Hinton agar (MHA) plates. MIC strips were placed onto plates using an applicator followed by incubation at 37 °C for 16–18 h. The result was read where the ellipse intersects the MIC scale on the strip for the tested antibiotics.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Antibiotic Resistance Profiling of Clinical Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibiotic susceptibility test (AST) of both clinical isolates was performed using the modified Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method on Mueller Hinton agar (Hi-Media Laboratories, India) following standard zone size interpretative criteria set by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) [25 ]. The different antibiotic disks used in this study during AST were procured from HiMedia Laboratories, India, and include amoxicillin (30 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), cotrimoxazole (25 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), imipenem (10 μg), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (20/10 μg), cefotaxime (30 μg), ceftriaxone (30 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), aztreonam (30 μg), and cefpodoxime (10 μg). The E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates were regarded as MDR isolates if they were resistant to at least one agent of three different classes of antimicrobial disks [2 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing by Disk Diffusion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibiotic susceptibility testing was done using disk diffusion method as described by Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute [35 ]. 95 isolates were randomly selected for convenience from all bacteria isolated from the three counties. The isolates were tested for susceptibility to commonly used antibiotics including Ampicillin, Tetracycline, Streptomycin, Co-trimoxazole, Kanamycin, Gentamicin, Sulphamethoxazole, and Chloramphenicol (HiMedia).
Isolates were grown on blood agar for 24 hours; 5 colonies were picked from each plate and suspended in 5 ml of sterile normal saline which was then adjusted to a density approximately equal to McFarland Opacity Standard number 0.5. A dry sterile cotton swab was then placed inside the suspension; excess liquid from the swab was expressed against the wall of the tube and the swab used to spread the bacterial suspension evenly on the surface of Mueller-Hinton agar in order to get confluent growth. Antibiotic disks were then placed on the surface of the inoculum and incubated for 18–24 hours. Zones of inhibition were measured to the nearest millimeter and interpretation as to whether the bacterium was resistant or susceptible to the particular antibiotic was done according to specifications defined by Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI 2006).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Graphite Oxide Synthesis and Antibacterial Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Natural graphite flakes, concentrated sulfuric acid (98%), potassium permanganate, 30% hydrogen peroxide, concentrated hydrochloric acid (98%) and ultrapure water were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Malaysia. All of the aqueous solutions were prepared in deionized water. Analytical grade absolute ethanol, NaCl, peptone, yeast extract, beef extract, agar were purchased from Merck, Germany. Antibacterial discs: azithromycin (AZM), gentamycin (GEN), ciprofloxacin (CIP), cefixime (CFM), amoxicillin (AMX), cotrimoxazole (COT), imipenem (IPM) and ceftriaxone (CTR) were bought from Himedia Laboratories, India. 6X loading dye, 1 Kb plus DNA ladder and Presto Blue dye were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific. Human serum and bacterial strains collected from urine were obtained from North East Medical College Hospital, Sylhet, Bangladesh (https://www.nemc.edu.bd/pathology-department/) following all the ethical conditions and legislations approved by the ethical committee with the Ref. No. NEMC/Sylhet/287/2013 [24 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Antimicrobial Resistance Profile of Campylobacter

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The AMR profile of Campylobacter isolates was determined using standard Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method as described by Taremi et al. [16 (link)]. A total of 38 revived isolates were tested against a panel of eight antibiotics that included ampicillin (AMP, 10 µg), gentamicin (GEN, 10 µg), ERY (15 µg), levofloxacin (LE, 5 µg), CIP (5 µg), nalidixic acid (NA, 30 µg), ceftriaxone (CTR, 30 µg), and co-trimoxazole (COT, 25 µg) (HiMedia). The isolates were revived on mCCDA plates supplemented with FD009 supplement. The growth suspension prepared in Tryptic soy broth and compared with 0.5 McFarland standard was spread on Mueller-Hinton agar plates supplemented with 7% sheep blood and incubated at 42°C in a CO2 incubator at 5% CO2 tension for 24 h. Zone diameter was measured and breakpoints were interpreted based on the recommendations of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute standards for disc diffusion assay (CLSI 2016).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 18 clinically relevant antibiotics were tested using the disc diffusion method (Kirby-Bauer's) and the inhibition zone diameters were measured by (mm) according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines M100 27 th 18 . These antimicrobial discs were amoxicillin/clavulanic acid ( 30μg), ampicillin (10 μg), cefotaxime (30 μg), ceftazidime (30 μg), ceftriaxone (30 μg), aztreonam (30 μg), imipenem (10 μg), meropenem (10 μg), ertapenem(10 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), tobramycin (10 μg) , amikacin (30 μg), tetracycline (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), norfloxacin (10 μg), nalidixic acid (30 μg), co-trimoxazole (25 μg) and colistin (10 μg) were obtained from HiMedia Laboratories (India). The results for the antimicrobial susceptibility test strain were interpreted as (S) susceptible, (I) intermediate, or (R) resistant by comparing the results to the CLSI 2017 18 standard zone diameter Quality control strains used in antimicrobial susceptibility testing are Escherichia coli ATCC #25922 18 . Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of imipenem and meropenem were determined using the agar dilution method and interpreted according to the CLSI guidelines, the carbapenems resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) isolates were included based on showing MICs ≥2 µg/mL for imipenem or meropenem were considered resistant. Only one isolate per patient was included 19 .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The susceptibility of bacterial isolates against different antibiotics was tested by the disk diffusion method [modified Kirby-Bauer method] on Mueller Hinton Agar (Hi-Media Laboratories, India) following standard zone size interpretative criteria recommended by Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) [16 ]. Antibiotics that were tested in our study include amoxicillin (AMX 10 μg), amoxicillin clavulanate (AMC 20/10 μg), Gentamycin (GEN 10 μg), Ciprofloxacin (CIP 5 μg), Cotrimoxazole (COT 30 μg), Cefixime (CFM 5 μg), Cefotaxime/Ceftriaxone (CTX/CTR 30 μg), Ceftazidime (CAZ 30 μg), Cefepime (CPM 30 μg), piperacillin tazobactam (PIT 100/10 μg), Imipenem (IMP 10 μg), Meropenem (MEM 10 μg), Polymixin B (PB300 units), and Nitrofurantoin (NI 300 U) (Hi-Media Laboratories, India).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!