The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

5 protocols using ice crispr analysis tool

1

Genome Editing Analysis in Erythroid Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genome editing was analyzed in HUDEP-2 cells at days 0 and 9 of erythroid differentiation and in CB and adult mobilized HSPC-derived erythroid cells at days 6 and 14 of erythroid differentiation, respectively. Genomic DNA was extracted from control and edited cells using the PureLink Genomic DNA Mini Kit (Life Technologies), Quick-DNA/RNA Miniprep (ZYMO Research), or DNA Extract All Reagents Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) following the manufacturer’s instructions. To evaluate NHEJ efficiency at gRNA target sites, we performed PCR followed by Sanger sequencing and TIDE analysis (tracking of InDels by decomposition) (49 (link)) or ICE CRISPR Analysis Tool (Synthego) (Table 2) (50 (link)).
Digital droplet PCR was performed using EvaGreen mix (Bio-Rad) to quantify the frequency of the 4.9-kb deletion. Short (~1 min) elongation time allowed the PCR amplification of the genomic region harboring the deletion. Control primers annealing to a genomic region on the same chromosome (chr 11) were used as DNA loading control (Table 3).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

CRISPR-Cas9 Editing Evaluation in Dmd Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CRISPR-Cas9 editing using the single and combo guide strategies was evaluated using the online ICE CRISPR analysis tool (Synthego). The 337-bp region encompassing the in55g1_SD-mediated cleavage site was amplified using the primers indicated in Table 2 using tissue-specific DNA from treated and untreated Dmd Δ52–54 mice. The amplicons were purified using the QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (QIAGEN) and sequenced with Sanger sequencing using the sa_ex55g1_fw primer. Sanger sequencing data from treated mice and untreated mice (control) were uploaded into ICE, which determined the frequency and nature of indel formation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying Genome Editing Efficiency via T7 Endonuclease I Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA from modified cells was isolated according to the manufacturer’s protocol of DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen). 200 ng of isolated amplified genomic DNA (20 μl of purified PCR product in 1x NEB 2. Buffer (NEB)) was then denatured and reannealed to form heteroduplexes by using the next program on Veriti Thermal Cycler (life Technologies): 95 °C for 10 min; 95 °C to 85 °C ramping at –2 °C/s; 85 °C to 25 °C at – 0.25 °C/s; and 25 °C hold for 1 min. After reannealing process, products were treated with 1 μl of T7 Endonuclease I (NEB) and were analyzed on 10–15 % native PAGE gel. Gels were stained with SYBR Gold DNA stain (Life Technologies) for 30 min and were imaged with a DNA bioimaging system (Bio-Rad). Quantification was based on relative band intensities. Indel percentage was determined: 100 x (1 – (1 – (b + c)/(a + b + c))1/2), where a is the integrated intensity (determined by using ImageJ 1.53k software) of the undigested PCR product, wherein b and c are integrated intensities of cleaved PCR product.
Some PCR amplicons were also send for Sanger sequencing and then subjected to TIDE analysis70 (link) or ICE CRISPR Analysis Tool from Synthego to determine the degree of genome editing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

CRISPR Ribonucleoprotein Delivery and Indel Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
sgRNA (Synthego, 50 μM) and NLS-Cas9 protein (Synthego, 20μM) were mixed at 2.5:1 molar ratio (1 μL sgRNA + 1 μL protein) for 10 min at room temperature. 1 × 106 cells were resuspended with 18 μL electroporation buffer, P3 buffer (Lonza, V4XP-3032) for primary cells, SG buffer (Lonza, V4XC-3032) for Raji cells, and SF buffer (Lonza, V4XC-2032) for Nalm6 cells and K562 cells. 2 μL of Cas9/sgRNA complex was added to 18 μL of cells. Cells were electroporated on a Lonza 4D-Nucleofector with X Unit using vendor’s recommended settings for each cell type. Cells were transferred to flasks with warmed media immediately after electroporation. To verify gene editing, DNA was extracted from CRISPR edited cells using DNsasy Blood & Tissue Kit (QIAGEN, 69506). DNA samples were PCR amplified using KOD Hot Start DNA Polymerase (MilliporeSigma, 71842) with the primers listed in Supplementary Table 1 and the PCR product was subjected to Sanger sequencing. Indel frequencies were quantified using the ICE CRISPR Analysis Tool (Synthego).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Single-Embryo Mutation Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single embryos were collected at morula (Experiment 5) or blastocyst (Experiments 3–4) stage and lysed in 10 μL lysis buffer (Lucigen, Palo Alto, CA, United States) at 65°C for 6 min and 98°C for 2 min. PCR reactions were performed in two rounds with 35 cycles each. First PCR was composed of 9.2 μL embryo lysis and 10 μL Master Mix (GoTaq Hot Start Green Master Mix, Promega, Madison, United States) at 0.8 μL of 10 μM primers (Table 1) in DNAse/RNAse free water. Second round of PCR was composed of 5 μL from first PCR, 4.2 μL of water, 10 μL Master Mix and 0.8 μL of 10 μM primers in DNAse/RNAse free water. PCR conditions included one cycle at 95°C for 3 min followed by 35 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, primer annealing temperature for 30 s (ZFX: 60°C; OCT4: 54°C) and elongation at 72°C for 30 s, and then 1 cycle at 72°C for 5 min. PCR products were run in a 1% agarose gel and bands were extracted and purified (Qiaquick Gel extraction kit, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) for Sanger sequencing. Sequencing was performed by services provided by Genewiz (South Plainfield, NJ, United States). Mutations were analyzed by ICE CRISPR Analysis Tool (Synthego) and multiple sequence alignment (SNAPGene, GSL Biotech LLC, Chicago, United States). Indel rate was calculated based on the proportion of embryos with insertions/deletions vs. embryos sequenced.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!