The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Rat anti elav 7e8a10

The Rat anti-Elav 7E8A10 is a monoclonal antibody produced by the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank. It recognizes the Elav (Embryonic Lethal Abnormal Vision) protein, which is a neuron-specific RNA-binding protein that plays a crucial role in post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression in neurons.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using rat anti elav 7e8a10

1

Brain Dissection and Immunostaining Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Third instar larval and adult brains were dissected and stained using standard procedures (Contreras et al., 2018 ; Wu and Luo, 2006 (link)). Briefly, brains were dissected and fixed in 4% formaldehyde in 1X PBS for 20 min at room temperature. Samples were washed three times in PBT (0.3% Triton X-100 in 1X PBS) and blocked in 1% BSA/PBT for 30 min at room temperature. Antibodies were diluted in PBT and samples were incubated overnight at 4°C. The following monoclonal antibodies were obtained from Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank: rat anti-N-Cadherin (DN-Ex #8; 1:20), rat anti-DE-Cadherin (DCAD2; 1:20), rat anti-Elav (7E8A10, 1:20), mouse anti-Slit (C555.6D; 1:50), mouse anti-Acj6 (1:10), mouse anti-Fasciclin3 (7G10; 1:20), mouse anti-Pros (MR1A, 1:20). Other antibodies used were guinea pig anti-Dpn (1:5,000, kind gift from Dr. Andrea Brand), rabbit anti-HA (C29F4, Cell Signaling, 1:500) and rabbit anti-GFP (A11122, Invitrogen, 1:1,000). Fluorescent-dye conjugated secondary antibodies were obtained from Jackson Immunoresearch and used 1:200. Hoechst was used as DNA counterstain (1:1,000).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemical Staining of Drosophila Imaginal Discs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Late third instar larval imaginal discs were dissected and stained. Primary antibodies were rat anti-Elav 7E8A10 (1:500, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, U. of Iowa (DSHB, Iowa), rabbit anti-ß-galactosidase (1:1000, Cappel), mouse anti-Eya 10H6 (1:200, DSHB, Iowa), rabbit anti-BarH1(S12) (1:1000, gift from Tetsuya Kojima), rabbit anti-Omb (1:1000, [47 (link),49 (link)]), rabbit anti-phospho-histone H3 (anti-PH3) (1:200–1:1000, Upstate Biotechnology), rabbit anti-Caspase-3 (cleaved) (1:200, Upstate Biotechnology), mouse anti-CD2 (rat) (1: 2000, Serotec), and mouse anti-Wg 4D4 (1:200, DSHB, Iowa), mouse anti-BrdU (1:50, Roche). Secondary antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch) were FITC-, Cy3- or Cy5-conjugated anti-rabbit, anti-rat and anti-mouse. Confocal microscopy was performed on a Zeiss LSM 310 or LSM 510. X-Gal staining of lacZ expression was done as described [63 (link)]. Anti-BrdU staining was performed as described [9 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunostaining Protocols for Drosophila Eye Imaginal Discs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Wandering 3rd instar larvae were collected from respective genetic crosses and eye imaginal discs were processed for immunostaining as previously described (Sudhakaran et al. 2014 (link)). Each immunostaining experiment was reproduced in at least three independent biological replicates: for each replicate, discs dissected from multiple larvae were individually examined.
Primary antibodies used were: rabbit anti-RFP (Invitrogen R103367,) at 1:1000, rabbit-anti-Rasputin (Aguilera-Gomez et al. 2017 (link)) 1:1000, rabbit-anti-Caprin (Papoulas et al. 2010 (link)) at 1:1000, rat-anti-Elav-7E8A10 (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank) 1:300 and chicken-anti-Ataxin-2 (Bakthavachalu et al. 2018 (link)) at 1:500. Secondary antibodies were used at 1:1000 dilution: Alexa Fluor®488 goat anti-Chicken (Invitrogen A11039), Alexa Fluor®488 goat anti-Rabbit (Invitrogen A11078), Alexa Fluor®488 goat anti-Rat (Invitrogen A11006), and Fluor®555 goat anti-Rabbit (Invitrogen A21428).
Prepared eye-imaginal discs were mounted in Vectashield Mounting Medium (Vector Labs, H-1000) on microscope slides and imaged on a Zeiss LSM880 confocal microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Drosophila Photoreceptor Development Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All procedures (TEM and Immunofluorescence) were performed as previously described (Nie et al. 2012 (link), 2014 (link)). For TEM, heads taken from flies 1–2 days of posteclosion. The antibodies used in this study were: rat anti-Elav (7E8A10, 1:100, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank) primary antibody, mouse anti-EYS (21A6, 1:50, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank), rabbit anti-Rh6 (1:1,000, Dr. Claude Desplan), mouse anti-Rh5 (1:50, Dr. Steve Britt), Cy5 conjugated donkey antirat secondary (1:200, Jackson Immunoresearch #712-175-153), Alexa 488 conjugated goat antirabbit (1:200, Life Technologies #A-11008), Alexa 488 conjugated goat antimouse (1:200, Jackson Immunoresearch #115-545-146), and Cy5 conjugated goat antimouse (1:200, Jackson Immunoresearch #115-175-166). F-actin was labeled using rhodamine-conjugated phalloidin (1:200, Life Technologies #R415). Confocal images were captured on a Leica TCS SP5. TEM imaging was conducted with a JOEL 1010 and JOEL 1400. All images were processed in Fiji or Adobe Photoshop.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Imaginal Disc Dissection and Immunostaining

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Imaginal discs were dissected and fixed according to standard protocols. Primary antibodies used were guinea-pig anti-Hth [74 (link)], rabbit anti-PH3 (Sigma), rabbit anti β-galactosidase (Cappel), mouse anti β-galactosidase (Sigma), mouse anti-CD2 (Serotec), rabbit anti-GFP (Molecular Probes), mouse anti-Ey (Clements et al., 2008) and rabbit anti-cyclin B [75 (link)]. Mouse anti-Eya, rat anti-ELAV (7E8A10), and mouse anti-cyclin B were from Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank (Iowa University). Fluorescently labeled secondary antibodies were from Molecular Probes. Anti-mouse-HRP (Sigma) was used for immunoperoxidase staining. Digoxigenin labelled stg RNA probe was produced from cDNA clone LD47579 (BDGP). ImageJ was used to quantify pixel intensities (http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantification of Brain Lobe Volume

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Brains were dissected in PBS and fixed with 4% PFA/PBS/0.3%Triton for 20 minutes and blocked in PBS/0.3%Triton/1%BSA/5% normal goat serum and incubated in primary antibody in PBS/0.3%Triton/1%BSA overnight. Primary antibodies include guinea pig anti-Deadpan (gift from Chris Doe, originally from Jim Skeath, 1:1000), rat anti-Deadpan (Abcam ab195172, 1:250 or 1:500), mouse anti-Prospero MR1A (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, 1:1000), rat anti-Elav 7E8A10 (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, 1:250) and mouse anti-Repo 8D12 (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, 1:250) and mouse anti-Strep (Qiagen, 1:500) with goat secondary antibodies from Jackson Laboratories used 1:500. Brains were mounted with tape spacers and imaged using a Leica Sp8 with 2 βm sections through the entire brain lobe. Resulting stacks were analyzed using the Surfaces function in Imaris (Bitplane) to quantify brain lobe volume. One lobe from each brain was analyzed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunohistochemistry of Drosophila Brains

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Brains were dissected in ice-cold Ringer’s solution, washed, and fixed in fresh fixative solution (4% paraformaldehyde, 50 mM NaCl, 0.1 M Pipes, pH 7.2) for 20 min at room temperature with gentle agitation. Fixed tissues were analyzed by immunostaining and microscopy. Immunostaining was performed using fluorescent secondary antibodies essentially as described earlier (Lyalin et al., 2006 (link)). The following primary antibodies and corresponding dilutions were used for immunostaining: mouse anti-GFP 8H11 (1:100), anti-Repo 8D12 (1:10), rat anti-Elav 7E8A10 (1:10), mouse anti-Brp nc82 (1:10), all from Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank; rabbit anti-GFP from Invitrogen (1:800), rat anti-HA from Roche (1:1000), rat anti-Dpn from Abcam (1:500). The following secondary antibodies were used: goat anti-rabbit and anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 546 and 488 (1:250), all from Invitrogen; donkey anti-mouse and anti-rabbit Cy3 (1:250) and FITC (1:150), from Jackson Laboratories. Stained samples were mounted on slides in Vectashield (Vector Laboratories) and imaged using Zeiss Axio Imager M2 fluorescence microscope with ApoTome module for optical sectioning or Zeiss 510 META Confocal microscope. Images were processed using Zeiss Zen and ImageJ software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Larval Immunostaining of Drosophila Eye Discs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Wandering 3 rd instar larvae were collected from respective genetic crosses and eye imaginal discs were processed for immunostaining as previously described (Sudhakaran et al. 2014) . Each immunostaining experiment was reproduced in at least three independent biological replicates: for each replicate, discs dissected from multiple larvae were individually examined. Primary antibodies used were: rabbit anti-RFP (Invitrogen R103367,) at 1:1000, rabbit-anti-Rasputin (Aguilera-Gomez et al. 2017) 1:1000, rabbit-anti-Caprin (Papoulas et al. 2010 ) at 1:1000, rat-anti-Elav-7E8A10 (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank) 1:300 and chickenanti-Ataxin-2 (Bakthavachalu et al. 2018 ) at 1:500. Secondary antibodies were used at 1:1000 dilution: Alexa FluorⓇ488 goat anti-Chicken (Invitrogen A11039), Alexa FluorⓇ488 goat anti-Rabbit (Invitrogen A11078), Alexa FluorⓇ488 goat anti-Rat (Invitrogen A11006), FluorⓇ555 goat anti-Rabbit (Invitrogen A21428). Prepared eye-imaginal discs were mounted in Vectashield Mounting Medium (Vector Labs, H-1000) on microscope slides and imaged on a Zeiss LSM880 confocal microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!