The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

7 protocols using click it edu detection

1

Measuring Cell Cycle Kinetics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To assess cell cycle progression a dual thymidine labeling approach was used. EdU was administered through intraperitoneal injection to time pregnant females at 50 mg/kg followed by BrdU injection at 50 mg/kg 1.5 h later. 13.5 day old embryos were harvested 30 min after the BrdU injection, fixed in 4% PFA in PBS, brains frozen in 30% sucrose in PBS, and coronally cut at 12 μm on a cryomicrotome. Slides were incubated in 2 N HCl at 37 °C for 20 min and rinsed in PBS with 0.2% Triton X-100 prior to immunostaining with α-BrdU monoclonal antibodies (1:10; Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA), α-Ki67 antibodies (1:200, Abcam, Cambridge, MA), and Click-iT EdU detection following the manufactures instructions (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA). Subsequently, mediolateral cortical aspects were imaged as described above and labeled cells of 200 μm wide cortical segments counted. Calculation of cell cycle parameters followed established paradigms40 (link),41 (link). Specifically, the duration of the experiment (TI) was divided by ratios of single (EdU+) over double-labeled cells (EdU+/BrdU+) to generate estimates of S phase length (TS). To estimate total cell cycle length (TC), TS was divided by the ratio of EdU+/BrdU+ cells over Ki67+ cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Measuring Cell Cycle Kinetics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To assess cell cycle progression a dual thymidine labeling approach was used. EdU was administered through intraperitoneal injection to time pregnant females at 50 mg/kg followed by BrdU injection at 50 mg/kg 1.5 h later. 13.5 day old embryos were harvested 30 min after the BrdU injection, fixed in 4% PFA in PBS, brains frozen in 30% sucrose in PBS, and coronally cut at 12 μm on a cryomicrotome. Slides were incubated in 2 N HCl at 37 °C for 20 min and rinsed in PBS with 0.2% Triton X-100 prior to immunostaining with α-BrdU monoclonal antibodies (1:10; Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA), α-Ki67 antibodies (1:200, Abcam, Cambridge, MA), and Click-iT EdU detection following the manufactures instructions (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA). Subsequently, mediolateral cortical aspects were imaged as described above and labeled cells of 200 μm wide cortical segments counted. Calculation of cell cycle parameters followed established paradigms40 (link),41 (link). Specifically, the duration of the experiment (TI) was divided by ratios of single (EdU+) over double-labeled cells (EdU+/BrdU+) to generate estimates of S phase length (TS). To estimate total cell cycle length (TC), TS was divided by the ratio of EdU+/BrdU+ cells over Ki67+ cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying epidermal progenitor dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To quantify construct abundance in the screen for clonal expansion, head skin of mice at P21 was collected and digested in 0.25% collagenase at 37 C° for 1 hour to release mesenchymal cells from the epithelium. Head skins from two animals were pooled and treated as a biological replicate, to achieve a ~200 fold coverage. To quantify construct abundance in the renewal and cell division screens, head skin of mice at E18.5 was digested in 2mg/ml dispase at 37 C° for 1 hour to separate epidermis from dermis. Epidermal tissue was further digested with 0.25% trypsin for 30 minutes into single cells. Head skins from 4 animals were pooled together to make one biological replicate, thus achieving a ~45 fold coverage. For the renewal screen, single epidermal progenitor cells were stained with CD326/EpCAM-APC (G8.8, 1:50; BD Biosciences) and CD49f/α6-Integrin-PerCP (GoH3, 1:50; Biolegend). For the cell division screen, single epidermal cells were subjected for Click-iT EdU detection (Invitrogen, C10338) followed by CD49f/α6-Integrin-PerCP staining. Cell populations of interest were isolated using BD FACSAria II machine (BD Biosciences). gDNA from all samples was extracted using QIAamp DNA tissue mini kit (Qiagen). Barcode pre-amplification, sequencing, and data processing using Deseq2 program65 (link) were performed as previously described27 (link),66 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Muscle Regeneration Analysis with EdU and BrdU

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Muscle injury and analysis of regenerating muscle fibers were performed as previously described (Shea et al., 2010 (link)). EdU (Carbosynth) in PBS (2.5 mg/ml) was intraperitoneally injected into adults (two doses of 70 μl/day) and subcutaneously injected into pups (two doses of 20 μl/day). EdU detection was carried out according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Click-iT EdU detection; Invitrogen). One dose of 150 μl of 1.5 mg/ml BrdU (Sigma) was intraperitoneally injected into adults along with 2.5 mg/ml BrdU in 5% sucrose water for drinking.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying Neural Stem Cell Proliferation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To monitor NSC proliferation, we analyzed NSCs by immunostaining of mouse anti–Ki-67 antibody (BD Pharmingen) and Click-IT EdU detection (Invitrogen) after 4 h exposure to EdU, and co-stained with rabbit anti-Sox2 antibody (EMD Millipore) or DAPI (Sigma) to count all cells. Cell images were obtained on AF6000 (Leica) and BZ-X (Keyence). Cell counting was performed using the ImageJ software for images captured on the AF6000, and Hybrid cell count (Keyence), an algorithm for cell counting, for images captured on the BZ-X. Six to eight images were collected under each condition. Inhibitors used for cell culture were obtained from the indicated suppliers: bafilomycin A1 (Sigma), SAR405 (Cayman Chemical), Dynasore (Adipogen), thapsigargin (Adipogen), nocodazole (Adipogen), DAPT (Calbiochem), AG1478 (Cell Signaling Technology), Torin-1 (Cayman Chemical), and rapamycin (Wako). To measure protein stability, cells were incubated with 10 µg/ml cycloheximide (Sigma) to block protein synthesis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Measuring Adult Hemocyte Proliferation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To assess cell proliferation in adult hemocytes, adult F1 progeny of yw or HmlΔ-GAL4, UAS-GFP x CantonS were maintained for 14 days on fly food supplemented with a stock of 0.5 mg/ml EdU (Invitrogen) to a final concentration of 0.4mM EdU. Animals were immune challenged with bacterial infections both before or during EdU feedings. Various ages of adult animals (starting labeling at 0–1 week after eclosion) and crosses with other control lines (Oregon R, w1118 etc.) were examined. Hemocytes were released in multi-well dishes ex vivo and Click-IT EdU detection was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Invitrogen).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantifying epidermal progenitor dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To quantify construct abundance in the screen for clonal expansion, head skin of mice at P21 was collected and digested in 0.25% collagenase at 37 C° for 1 hour to release mesenchymal cells from the epithelium. Head skins from two animals were pooled and treated as a biological replicate, to achieve a ~200 fold coverage. To quantify construct abundance in the renewal and cell division screens, head skin of mice at E18.5 was digested in 2mg/ml dispase at 37 C° for 1 hour to separate epidermis from dermis. Epidermal tissue was further digested with 0.25% trypsin for 30 minutes into single cells. Head skins from 4 animals were pooled together to make one biological replicate, thus achieving a ~45 fold coverage. For the renewal screen, single epidermal progenitor cells were stained with CD326/EpCAM-APC (G8.8, 1:50; BD Biosciences) and CD49f/α6-Integrin-PerCP (GoH3, 1:50; Biolegend). For the cell division screen, single epidermal cells were subjected for Click-iT EdU detection (Invitrogen, C10338) followed by CD49f/α6-Integrin-PerCP staining. Cell populations of interest were isolated using BD FACSAria II machine (BD Biosciences). gDNA from all samples was extracted using QIAamp DNA tissue mini kit (Qiagen). Barcode pre-amplification, sequencing, and data processing using Deseq2 program65 (link) were performed as previously described27 (link),66 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!