The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

A303s su

Manufactured by Olympus
Sourced in United Kingdom, United States

The A303S-SU is a spectrophotometer designed for general laboratory use. It measures the absorbance or transmittance of samples across a wide range of wavelengths, providing data on the chemical composition and concentration of substances.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

3 protocols using a303s su

1

Calcium Flux Imaging of Microbubble-Mediated Sonoporation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To image calcium flux, the spheroids were loaded with freshly dissolved, cell-permeable 1 µM Fluo 4-AM (F14201, Thermo Fisher Scientific), a green fluorescent, intracellular Ca2+ indicator, for 30 min at 37 °C. Then, the spheroids were moved to a glass bottom dish (P50G-0-30-F, MatTek, Ashland, MA, USA) containing media with 1 × 106 microbubbles. A coverslip was placed above the spheroids. The presence of microbubbles on the spheroids was microscopically confirmed. Using an in-house designed cone housing and a water immersion transducer (A303S-SU, 0.5-inch diameter, Olympus NDT), US was delivered (frequency 1 MHz; PNP 250 kPa; pulse length 10 µs; pulse interval 10 ms; treatment duration 10 s), and green fluorescence was measured for up to 1 min (Supplementary Videos S3, 4). The involvement of mechanosensitive channels in UTMC-induced Ca2+ influx was confirmed by pretreating spheroids with 1 µM GsMTx4 (STG-100, Alomone labs, Jerusalem, Israel) for 30 min. The occurrence of sonoporation was confirmed by loading spheroids with 120 µM PI (P3566, Thermo Fisher Scientific) in the same setup (Supplementary Video S2). The videos were quantified using Fiji.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Ultrasound-Induced Deformation of Hydrogels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The hydrogel (containing the channel) was placed in a tank of de-gassed and de-ionised water under a 40 × water immersion objective lens (model: LUMPLFLN, numerical aperture: 0.8, working distance: 3.3 mm; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). A focused transducer (model: A303 S-SU, diameter: 13 mm, focal distance: 15.2 mm, centre frequency: 1 MHz; Olympus, Essex, UK) was placed to target the centre of the focal plane of the lens. This alignment was performed using a needle hydrophone (diameter: 0.2 mm, Precision Acoustics, UK). The hydrophone was also used to calibrate the peak-rarefactional pressure in situ. An LED light source (KL 2500, Schott, Dorset, UK) provided illumination from below (Fig. 1a).
Each sample was sonicated with a single pulse (pulse length: 10 ms, centre frequency: 1 MHz, peak-rarefactional pressure: 600 kPa). The transducer was driven by sinusoidal pulses generated by a function generator (33500 B Series, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and passed through a 50-dB amplifier (E&I, Rochester, NY, USA). A frequency of 1 MHz was chosen as it is commonly used in clinical systems and many proposed applications. Lower-frequency pulses can also penetrate deeper into the body. For the stiffest gels (E = 8.7 kPa), a peak-rarefactional pressure of 1 MPa was used instead, as no deformation could be seen at lower pressures.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Imaging Endothelial Cell Sonoporation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Imaging was performed on a four-channel Nikon A1 spectral confocal microscope in resonant mode with a 60x oil-immersion objective lens (NA=1.49). The cultured HUVECs were placed within a microscopy incubation chamber maintained at 37°C and 5% CO2 throughout all experiments. Ultrasound was delivered with a flat, single-element transducer (f = 1 MHz, 13-mm diameter, Olympus NDT, Waltham, MA, USA, #A303S-SU) by way of an in-house fabricated water-filled coupling cone, positioned at ∼45° from the optical axis(Helfield et al. 2016 (link)). The ultrasound exposure conditions consisted of a single pulse of 8 cycles at 1 MHz (total treatment time is therefore 8 μs) at peak-negative pressures (PNP) from 0.1–0.8 MPa, calibrated with a hydrophone (Onda Corp, Sunnyvale, CA, USA, HGL-200) within an open water tank environment. A single burst of 8 cycles was employed in an attempt to minimize confounding effects; including standing waves and radiation forces, as has been performed in many previous works into this phenomenon (e.g. (Hu et al. 2013 (link))). A limitation of this study, therefore, is the static nature of the microbubble-endothelial cell complex, and we acknowledge that fluid flow and acoustic radiation forces may ultimately alter the specific acoustic conditions required to undergo sonoporation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!