The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

4 protocols using scn400f platform

1

Multiplex Immunofluorescence Staining Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To prepare specimens for multiplex IF staining, tissue sections were cut at 4 μm from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded blocks. All sections on slides were deparaffinized using the Bond ER2 Leica Biosystems AR9640, followed by staining with the Leica Bond RX autostainer. The slides were stained with - CD3 (1:50 SP7 Abcam ab16669), CD16 (1:50 2H7 CellSignaling Technologies 88251S), CD32b (1:2000 NovusBiologicals NBP2–89364), and CD68 (1:400 PGM-1 DAKO). Antibody binding was visualized using secondary anti-mouse/anti-rabbit polymer HRP followed with TSA-Opal reagents (Akoya NEL811001KT). Tissue slides were incubated with DAPI as a counterstain and coverslipped with VectaShield mounting media (Vector Labs). Control tissue samples were stained for each marker as positive controls.
Whole slide digital images were captured with the PhenoImager HT platform and analyzed with QuPath software24 (link). Tissue samples from consecutive slides were stained by conventional H&E and scanned with the Leica SCN400F platform. H&E slides in conjunction with Cytokeratin staining were used to annotate tumor regions within the whole slide image. Cells were segmented, phenotyped, and enumerated using the QuPath object classification algorithm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multiplex Digital Pathology Analysis of Tumor Microenvironment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Digital images were captured with the PerkinElmer Vectra-Polaris platform following hot spot lymphocyte assessment: Areas in the tumor-stroma interface were scanned at ×20 and selected for analysis. We obtained six images of 0.36 mm2 each per tissue sample for analysis. Multiplexed images were analyzed with InForm Software (PerkinElmer). The total number of cells per mm2 was enumerated for all the cell phenotypes expressed in the stroma and the tumor compartment. Tissue samples stained by conventional H&E were scanned with the Leica SCN400F platform at ×20 and magnified at ×200–400 for immune infiltrate evaluation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Automated Quantitative Pathology Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Digital images were acquired with a Vectra 3.0 Automated Quantitative Pathology Imaging System (Akoya Biosciences). A ×10 objective lens was used for whole-slide scans to identify the regions of interest (ROIs). A ×20 objective lens was used for the multispectral images (MSIs). Seven to 15 ROIs were selected from each tissue sample for mIHC analysis. ROIs that contained at least 30% tumor cells were selected. Tissue segmentation was performed according to cytokeratin and DAPI staining. Cell segmentation and phenotyping of individual cells were performed according to individual markers and the presence of DAPI using Inform 2.4 software (Akoya Biosciences). For tumor versus stroma analysis, the stamp size for the ROIs was 670 × 502 μm2. For the nearest-neighbor analysis, the stamp size for the ROIs was 1340 × 1004 μm2. Consecutive tissue slides for each case were stained using the conventional H&E method to ensure the presence of tumor cells and to evaluate the fixation quality. Tissue slides were digitally scanned with the Leica SCN400F platform at ×20 and magnified at ×200 to ×400 for immune infiltration evaluation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative Spatial Immunophenotyping of Tumor Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Digital mIHC images were acquired with the Vectra Polaris Automated Quantitative Pathology Imaging System (Akoya Biosciences). Whole tissue slides were scanned at 20Â magnification and visualized with Phenochart software (Akoya Biosciences) to identify the regions of interest (ROI). Between 13 and 20 ROIs were selected from each tissue sample for mIHC analysis with InForm 2.4 software (Akoya Biosciences). Cell phenotypes were enumerated in the stroma and tumor compartment for the images. Each tissue slide was analyzed in individual InForm projects.
Consecutive tissue slides for each case were stained by conventional hematoxylin and eosin method to ensure the presence of tumor and evaluate fixation quality. Tissue slides were digitally scanned with the Leica SCN400F platform at 20Â and magnified at 200Â to 400Â for immune infiltration evaluation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!