The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Genjet dna in vitro transfection reagent version 2

Manufactured by SignaGen

GenJet DNA In Vitro Transfection Reagent version II is a cationic polymer-based transfection reagent for the delivery of DNA into a variety of mammalian cell lines.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

2 protocols using genjet dna in vitro transfection reagent version 2

1

Sorting Heteroplasmic MEFs with Fluorescence

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Heteroplasmic MEFs harboring the tRNAAla point mutation were transfected with GenJet DNA In Vitro Transfection Reagent version II (SL100489; SignaGen Laboratories) as suggested by the manufacturers. After 24 h, cells were sorted using a FACSAria IIU (BD FACSDiva software, Version V8.0.2) by gating on single-cell fluorescence using a 561-nm laser and 600LP, 610/20 filter set for mCherry and a 488-nm laser and 505LP, 530/30 filter set for eGFP. Sorted cells expressing mCherry and eGFP were termed “Yellow”3 (link),4 (link). Sorted cells lacking fluorescence were termed “Black”.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Sorting Heteroplasmic Cybrid Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Heteroplasmic cybrids harboring the m.8344A>G mtDNA, generated in our laboratory as previously described (Hashimoto et al, 2015), were transfected with 30 μg of plasmid using GenJet DNA In Vitro Transfection Reagent version II (SL100489, SignaGen Laboratories) in a T‐75 flask, following the manufacturer's instructions. The cells were collected either 24 h, 48, or 72 h post‐transfection for cell sorting analysis. Sorting was performed in a FACS Aria IIU by gating on single‐cell fluorescence using a 561‐nm laser and 600LP, 610/20 filter set for mCherry; and a 488‐nm laser and 505LP, 530/30 filter set for eGFP. For some experiments, we also used a Beckman Coulter MoFlo Astrios EQ using a 100 μm nozzle at 25psi. Sorted cells were collected into separate tubes, one of them containing the sorted fluorescent cells either termed “GFP++” and “GFP+++” for some of the sortings, in the case of the mitoTev‐TALEs; or “Yellow” when co‐transfected with the two monomers containing mCherry and eGFP, in the case of the mitoTALEN, as previously described (Hashimoto et al, 2015); we also isolated the untransfected sorted population of cells lacking fluorescence which were termed “Black” for the mitoTALENs and termed “GFP−+” for the mitoTev‐TALE. The controls were also “sorted”, in order to mimic the same conditions for the three or four cell populations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!