The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Lunar prodigy advance

Manufactured by GE Healthcare
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, Italy, Belgium, Germany

The Lunar Prodigy Advance is a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) system designed for bone mineral density (BMD) assessment. It utilizes low-dose X-rays to measure the bone density of the spine, hip, and other skeletal sites. The system provides precise and reproducible measurements to aid in the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis and other bone-related conditions.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

193 protocols using lunar prodigy advance

1

DXA Body Composition Analysis in Obesity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Body composition analysis was assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) (GE Healthcare Lunar Prodigy Advance, GE Medical Systems, Milan, Italy), which is said to be the gold standard for body composition measurements in obese patients. Subjects were instructed to avoid excess physical effort in the 24 h before the analysis. The DXA measurement was performed in the morning, after a night's rest, fasting. Subjects were instructed in detail regarding the measurement procedure. During the procedure, patients wore cotton T-shirts, shorts, and socks with no metal, rubber, and plastic objects, and laid on the DXA table supine and motionlessly. The same trained operator positioned the subjects, performed the DXA scans, and executed the analysis according to the operator's manual, using the standard analysis protocol. The standard scan mode (for moderately obese subjects) or the thick scan mode (for extremely obese subjects), with absorbed radiation doses of 0.4 μGy and 0.8 μGy, respectively, were used. The intrasubject and intersubject coefficients of variation (CV% = 100 × standard deviations [SD]/mean) ranged from 1% to 5%. The coefficient of variation for the bone mass measurements was <1%. Anthropometric and DXA measurements are described in detail in our previous studies.[16 (link),30 (link),31 (link)]
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Anthropometric Measurements and Body Composition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Anthropometric measurements were taken with subjects wearing light clothing and no shoes. BMI was calculated as weight divided by the square of height (kg/m2). Obesity was defined as BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2. Waist circumference (cm) was measured at the level of the iliac crest at the end of normal expiration. Hip circumference was measured at the maximum protuberance of the buttocks.
Body composition analysis was assessed using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA; GE Healthcare Lunar Prodigy Advance, GE Medical Systems, Milan, Italy). Subjects were given complete instructions on the body composition analysis procedure and were instructed not to make any intense physical effort in the 24 h prior to body composition measurement. Total body fat mass (TBFM) was determined using standard scan mode (in the case of normal body weight and moderately obese subjects) or thick scan mode (in the case of extremely obese subjects); the absorbed doses of radiation were 0.4 and 0.8 μGy, respectively. Total body skeletal muscle mass (TBSMM) was calculated from appendicular lean soft tissue (ALST)—evaluated using DXA and the skeletal-muscle-prediction model created by Kim et al. [14 (link)]: TBSMM=(1.13×ALST)(0.02 ×age )+(0.61 ×sex )+0.97  (sex = 0 for female).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Visceral Adiposity and Muscle Mass Estimation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Visceral adiposity index (VAI) was calculated using the formula developed by Amato et al. [15 (link)]: Females:VAI=(waist circumference36.58+(1.89 × BMI))×(TG0.81)×(1.52HDL)
Total-body skeletal muscle mass was calculated using the skeletal muscle-prediction model created by Kim et al. [16 (link)]. The total-body skeletal muscle mass model is based on appendicular lean soft tissue (ALST), evaluated using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and sex (0 = female; 1 = male).
Total-body skeletal muscle mass = (1.13 × ALST) − (0.02 × age) + (0.61 × sex) + 0.97
Body composition was analyzed using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA; GE Healthcare Lunar Prodigy Advance, GE Medical Systems, Milan, Italy).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Body Composition Assessment Methods

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In the Physique study, body composition and anthropometrics (including total fat mass, lean mass, and android fat mass) were assessed with several methods, including Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA, Lunar Prodigy Advance, GE Medical Systems—Lunar, Madison, WI, USA) and B-mode axial plane ultrasound (model SSD-10, Aloka, Tokyo, Japan) [4 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Measuring Appendicular Lean Muscle Mass

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Body composition was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA; Lunar Prodigy Advance fan beam scanner, GE Medical Systems, Madison, WI, USA, Prodigy enCORE software version 16.10.151). Appendicular lean muscle mass (the sum of the lean mass in arms and legs/height, kg/m2) of less than 1.5 SD from the mean in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Study (NHANES) was classified as low lean muscle mass [22 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comprehensive Body Composition Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In the physique athletes, body composition and anthropometrics (including total fat mass, lean mass and visceral fat mass) were assessed with several methods, including Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA, Lunar Prodigy Advance, GE Medical Systems – Lunar, Madison, WI, USA) and B-mode axial plane ultrasound (model SSD-α10, Aloka, Tokyo, Japan). These methods were used to estimate subcutaneous fat tissue thickness of the arm (triceps brachii) and leg (vastus lateralis)19 (link). For both physique athletes and FINRISK study cohorts, waist and hip circumference was measured using standard protocols: waist circumference was measured midway between the lower rib margin and iliac crest, and hip circumference was measured at the level of the widest circumference over the buttocks. For the FINRISK cohort, anthropometric measures of total fat mass and lean mass were taken using a bioimpedance machine (Tanita TBF-300MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Dietary Interventions and Exercise Effects

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Subjects underwent preliminary health and fitness screens at the Michigan Clinical Research Unit (MCRU). The health screen included health history, measurements of weight, height, and body fat by a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (General Electric Lunar Prodigy Advance), and a fasting blood draw for fasting glucose and other laboratory chemistries. A fitness screen assessed individual maximal aerobic effort. It consisted of a treadmill test at 3 miles per hour with 2% slope increments every 3 minutes with the subject breathing through a mouthpiece using a Max II metabolic cart (AEI Technologies, Inc., Bastrop, TX). The criterion of maximal effort used was a respiratory quotient of 1. After matching by body weight, BMI, and aerobic fitness, 16 subjects, each, were assigned to low-carbohydrate (LC) or high-carbohydrate (HC) meals, and, within each dietary group, 8 subjects participated either in a sedentary (LCS or HCS) or an exercise (LCX or HCX) trial.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Whole-Body DXA Scan Protocol for Body Composition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Body composition was determined with a whole body DXA scan (Lunar Prodigy Advance; GE-Medical Systems, Madison, WI, USA) and corresponding analysis software (enCore 2011, version 13.60, GE-Healthcare). Scans and analysis were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. A urine sample was taken prior to the scan to assess urine specific gravity, and females were subjected to a pregnancy test. Once hydration and pregnancy status were established, participants were instructed to lie in a supine position with their arms resting against the sides of the body approximately 6.5–7 cm away from their torso. A block was placed between their feet and the participants were instructed to maintain a stationary position for the duration of the scan. DXA equipment was calibrated on a daily basis according to the protocol provided by the manufacturer. The operators defined the regions of interest (ROI) for the limb specific measures and custom ROI boxes were draw for the two specific sites. The ROI for the legs followed the inguinal line (cutting through the neck of the femur) to the bottom of the femur and the ROI for the arms followed the head of the radius (at the elbow) and dissected at the radiocarpal joint (of the wrist).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Whole-Body DXA Measurement Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DXA was performed using a Lunar Prodigy Advance (General Electric Healthcare, New York, USA) on the whole body, without specific preparation. QA and QC data evaluation was done every morning when patient assessment was planned and at least 3 days per week. QA and QC data were independently monitored every month. Over the 6-year period, we observed no deviation and there were no firmware or software upgrades. The DXA equipment was serviced by the manufacturer at least once per year. All patients were measured in underwear, without metal accessories worn. DXA uses two X-ray beams with different energy levels. Based on their X-ray attenuation properties, FFM, i.e., lean mass and bone mineral content, and FM were measured.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Fasting Metabolic Assessments by DXA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
On the first experimental day, the subjects reported to the laboratory between 8.00 and 11.00 AM after an overnight fast. Water intake was standardized to 400 mL to avoid body water content to influence body composition during dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanning. Participants rested at least 15 min in a supine position before blood pressure was measured three consecutive times by an automatic upper arm blood pressure monitor (M7, OMRON, Vernon Hills, IL, USA). If the third measurement of the systolic blood pressure was 5 mmHg different from the second, a fourth measurement was undertaken. Blood pressure was determined as the mean of the last two measurements. After the blood pressure measurements, a blood sample was taken from the cubital vein for determination of fasting blood lipoproteins, triglycerides, glucose, insulin and CRP. Body composition was determined by whole-body DXA scanning (Lunar Prodigy Advance; GE-medical Systems, Madison, WI, USA) and analyzed by software (enCORE v15, GE-medical Systems, Madison, WI, USA). Weight was measured by use of a calibrated digital scale.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!