The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

44 protocols using al oh 3

1

Microwave-assisted Synthesis of NaMOR Nanocrystals

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microwave-assisted hydrothermal synthesis was carried out to produce NaMOR nanocrystals. Colloidal silica (Ludox HS-40, 40% w/w, Aldrich), Al(OH)3 (98%, Aldrich), and NaOH (98%, Sigma-Aldrich) were used as precursors to obtain an initial gel with a ratio of 6 NaOH : Al2O3 : 30 SiO2 : 780 H2O. In a typical run, 1.6 g of Al(OH)3 was dissolved in 2.2 g of NaOH (98%, Sigma-Aldrich) and 61 g of deionized water. Then, 11.4 g of colloidal silica was added until complete dissolution, and 3 g of MOR nanocrystals from Zeolyst were used as seeds to enhance the crystallization rate. The resulting suspension was stirred for 1 h at 450 rpm. After, the obtained gel was placed in a Teflon autoclave that was put in a Milestone Flexiwave microwave. The crystallization conditions followed a ramp of 20 K min−1 to reach 453 K and used 600 W as the maximum power for a synthesis time of 1 h. This strategy allows the reduction of the synthesis time that has traditionally been reported from 24–48 h. Finally, the material was recovered by filtration, washed to a pH lower than 9, and dried at 343 K for 24 h in air. The final Si/Al ratio as determined with EDX is 10.5 for all NaMOR nanocrystals, which are then used during the ionic exchange (see below).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

OVA-Induced Allergic Airway Model

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) sodium salt, DEXA-water soluble, OVA, trypan blue, aluminum hydroxide gel, and Al(OH)3 were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Isoflurane was obtained from Hana Pharm. Co. (Hwaseong, Korea). IL-4, IL-5, and an OVA-specific IgE (OVA-sIgE) ELISA kit were obtained from MyBioSource (San Diego, CA, USA). TRIzol reagent was obtained from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Ovalbumin-Induced Airway Inflammation in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Airway inflammation was induced as previously described(37 (link)). Briefly, 6 week old BALB/c mice received an intraperitoneal injection of 10 μg of chicken ovalbumin (OVA) (grade V, Sigma-Aldrich) adsorbed to 20 mg of Al(OH)3 (Sigma-Aldrich) in PBS in a volume of 100 μl. Two weeks later the mice were exposed for approximately 45 min to an aerosol of 1% OVA in PBS produced by an Ultrasonic 2000 nebulizer. The mice were treated with OVA daily for one or four days. Twenty-four hours after the last OVA aerosol treatment the mice were sacrificed by an intraperitoneal injection of sodium pentobarbital. Lungs and trachea were excised and frozen in liquid nitrogen.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Therapeutic and Preventive Effects of Ts-AE and Ts-MLE on Allergic Asthma in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Six female Balb/c mice in each group were sensitized with 100 µg of OVA (Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) formulated with 20 μg of Al(OH)3 (Sigma-Aldrich) in a total volume of 200 μl by intraperitoneal injection (ip) on day 0, 14 and 21. For preventive groups, mice were treated intraperitoneally with 50 μg of Ts-AE or Ts-MLE prior to the OVA sensitization on days − 21, − 14 and − 7. For therapeutic groups, mice were co-administrated intraperitoneally with 50 μg of Ts-AE or Ts-MLE during the OVA sensitization on day 0, 14 and 21. One week after the last sensitization, all mice were challenged intranasally (in) with 100 μg of OVA in a total volume of 50 μl of sterile PBS under sedation of chloral hydrate (8 µg/20 g) for consecutive three days (day 28, 29 and 30) while mice in therapeutic groups were co-administrated intranasally with 25 μg of Ts-AE or Ts-MLE during the OVA challenge (Fig. 1). One group of mice was OVA-sensitized and challenged without treatment as non-treatment control. Another group of mice without treatment and challenge was used as normal control. Forty-eight hours after the last challenge, all mice were euthanized and the lung tissues were collected for inflammatory assessment, and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and sera were collected for immunological tests. All experiments were repeated once.

Regimen for mouse OVA sensitization and treatment

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Induction of Allergic Sensitization in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sensitization of animals to OVA in S+ND and S+HFD groups was performed using the method described previously (18 (link), 19 (link)). Briefly, 1 mg OA and 200 mg Al (OH)3 (Sigma) injected intraperitoneal (IP) on day 1 and 8. From day 14, the animals were placed in a closed chamber, with dimensions 30×20×20 cm, for exposing to an aerosol of 4% OVA for 18 ± 1 days for 15 min daily by using a nebulizer (CX3, Omron Health care Europe B.V., and the Netherlands). All control animals (C+ND and C+HFD) were treated similarly but saline was used instead of OVA solution. The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunotherapy for Che a 2 Allergy in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Recombinant Che a 2 and the mouse model were previously described by our laboratory (14 (link), 15 (link)). Four intraperitoneal injections were administered to mice (n=16) at weekly intervals with 5 μg of rChe a 2 adsorbed in 5 mg Al (OH)3 (Sigma-Aldrich) suspended in 0.2 ml of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The sensitization procedure was done by 20-min aerosol challenge of 1% w/v rChe a 2 in PBS on days 28 and 34 after immunization, using an Omron CX3 nebulizer (Omron global, Japan). Control mice (n=5) received PBS plus alum and challenged with PBS, using similar schedule and routes as the experimental mice. Sensitized mice were randomly divided into two groups (n=8) and rested for one week. One group was sublingually treated with 0.1 mg of rChe a 2 (120 μl) every other day for three weeks (the solution was kept under the tongue for 1–2 min and then swallowed). The control (non-sensitized) and PBS (sham-treated) groups received PBS in the same way. Seven days later, mice were challenged with 1% w/v rChe a 2 in PBS on two consecutive days, and sacrificed after 48 hr.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Dexpramipexole Reduces Eosinophils in OVA-Induced Pulmonary Inflammation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Example 2

Effects of Dexpramipexole in an Ovalabumin Pulmonary Inflammation Mouse Model

Female, 6- to 8-wk-old C57BL/6 mice were kept under specific pathogen-free conditions. Mice were immunized intraperitoneally (ip) at days 14 and 21 with chicken egg OVA, adsorbed on 1 mg Al(OH)3 (alum; Sigma-Aldrich) in PBS (OVA/alum model). At day 41 and 42, all mice were exposed to aerosols of OVA/alum of grade III OVA (Sigma-Aldrich) in PBS. In experiments in which dexpramipexole was used, mice received ip injections with 30 mg/kg or 100 mg/kg dexpramipexole before OVA aerosol. Naive mice received challenges with PBS alone. In some experiments, immunized but unchallenged mice were included. Twenty hours after the last OVA challenge, all mice were killed for analysis, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was performed. Results of these experiments are shown in FIG. 7, which demonstrate that dexpramipexole significantly reduced eosinophils in BAL fluid, when compared to untreated group.

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Hydrothermal Synthesis of Aluminosilicate Zeolites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In a typical synthesis, aluminum hydroxide [Al(OH)3, Sigma-Aldrich] was dissolved in an aqueous solution of the OSDA in its hydroxide form. Colloidal silica (Ludox AS-40, Aldrich) was then added, and the mixture was maintained under stirring for 20 minutes. If required, a 10% wt solution of NH4F (Sigma-Aldrich) was added, and the resultant mixture gel was allowed to reach the desired silica to water ratio by evaporation under stirring. The final gel compositions were: SiO2 : 0.0167–0.033Al2O3 : 0.2–0.4OSDA(OH)2: 0–0.4NH4F : 3–30H2O, where OSDA can be one of the dicationic molecules described above.
Finally, the gels were transferred to Teflon lined stainless autoclaves and heated at 150 °C for 10 days. The solids were recovered by filtration, extensively washed with distilled water, and dried at 90 °C overnight. The samples were calcined in air at 550 °C for 4 hours. The resultant solid yields have been calculated based on silica + alumina conversion.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunofluorescent Complement Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibody against C3 complement component was from Calbiochem. Goat anti-Mouse IgG (H + L) Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor® 488 conjugate, and Goat anti-Rabbit IgG (H + L) Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor® 488 conjugate were from Molecular Probes.
Baby rabbit complement and Guinea Pig complement were from Cederlane Labs. AL(OH)3 was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Allergic Airway Inflammation Model

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Groups of 6 to 12 Balb/c mice were sensitized i.p. on days 0 and 7 with 2 mg/kg chicken egg albumin (OVA; Sigma-Aldrich, A5503) adsorbed on 80 mg/kg aluminium hydroxide (Al(OH)3; Sigma-Aldrich) in saline. Under i.p. ketamine and xylazine anaesthesia (respectively: Imalgene®, Merial, 50 mg/kg; Rompun®, Bayer, 3.33 mg/kg), sensitized mice were challenged daily on days 18–21 by intranasal (i.n.) instillation of 400 μg/kg OVA in saline, or saline alone for controls (1 mL/kg) [18 (link)]. Control animals were sensitized with OVA and challenged with saline.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!