The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

20 mm glass bottom dish

Manufactured by NEST Biotechnology
Sourced in China

The 20-mm glass bottom dish is a laboratory instrument designed for various microscopy applications. It features a glass bottom that allows for high-quality optical imaging and observation of samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using 20 mm glass bottom dish

1

Immunofluorescence Assay for HCV Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Huh7 cells were cultured on a 20-mm glass bottom dish (NEST) and transfected with the indicated plasmids. Then the cells were washed three times with PBS, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde–containing PBS for 20 min, and permeabilized with 1% Triton X-100–containing PBS for 20 min. After being blocked with 2% bovine serum albumin–PBS for 1 h, the cells were incubated with primary antibody diluted in antibody dilution buffer overnight at 4°C.After being washed three times with PBS, the cells were incubated with second antibody for 1 h and washed with PBS for three times. Then the cells were treated with DAPI (Beyotime) for 10 min, washed three times with PBS, and observed with a confocal microscope (Olympus). The following primary and second antibodies were used: mouse anti-NS5A antibody 9E10 was kindly provided by Chaoyang Li (Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China); mouse anti-Flag antibody was purchased from Beyotime; rabbit anti-Myc antibody was purchased from Proteintech; TRITC-conjugated or FITC-conjugated second antibodies were purchased from Pierce.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Evaluating BMSC Proliferation Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To study the proliferative ability of the BMSCs, cell growth was evaluated by manually counting at each passage. Briefly, 3 × 105 BMSCs were seeded in the 60 mm2 dish and passaged once the culture reached 80–90% confluence. Cell numbers were recorded and cells were replated at the same density each time. Cell proliferation was also examined by EdU assay. In brief, 1.5 × 105 BMSCs were plated in 20 mm glass bottom dish (NEST Biotechnology, China) and cultured overnight. After incubation with EdU for another 36 h, the cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min at room temperature, washed twice with 3% BSA in PBS, incubated with 0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS for 20 min and stained with the Click-iT EdU Imaging Kit (Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Nuclear staining was performed with 4′, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). Photomicrographs were taken by Laser confocal fluorescence microscopy (Leica, Germany). The percentage of proliferating cells was calculated based on counting EdU-positive cells/total cells in five individual visual fields.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Macrophage Endosomal Acidification and PW Uptake

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
THP-1 cells (2.4×105 cells/well) were seeded in a 20 mm glass bottom dish (NEST, Wuxi, China) and differentiated into macrophages. To assess the endosomal acidification, cells were incubated with pHrodo red-labeled dextran (10,000 MW, 10 µg/mL) and PW (200, 100 and 50 nM) or chloroquine (30 µM) for 5 h and processed for confocal imaging. To examine the uptake of PW in macrophages, cells were incubated with Cy5-labelled PW (PW-Cy5, 10 nM) for 5 h, and the cell membrane and nucleus were then stained with DiO and DAPI, respectively. Cells were washed with PBS and imaged on a confocal microscope (LSM900, Leica Microsystems Inc., Wetzlar, Hessen, Germany). The fluorescence of pHrodo red (ex: 565 nm; em: 585 nm) and Cy5 (ex: 640 nm; em: 670 nm) in the cells was quantified by the ImageJ software. For each condition, at least 30 cells were quantified with three independent repeats.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Cellular Uptake and Acidification Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
THP‐1 cells (2 × 105 cells) were seeded in a 20‐mm glass bottom dish (NEST, Wuxi, China) and differentiated into macrophages. They were incubated with pHrodo red‐ and fluorescein‐labeled 10000 MW dextran (10 µg mL−1) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) for 1 h before OM (500 µg mL−1) or chloroquine (30 µM) treatment for 3.5 h. Cells were then washed 3 times with PBS and imaged on a confocal microscope (LSM900, Leica, Wetzlar, Hessen, Germany). The fluorescence intensity of pHrodo red (ex: 565 nm; em: 585 nm) and fluorescein (ex: 488 nm; em: 525 nm) in the cells was quantified by Image J software (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA). For each condition, at least 30 cells from 3 independent experiments were quantified to obtain the intensity ratio of fluorescein to pHrodo red.
To examine the cellular uptake of Nano‐OM, THP‐1 cell‐derived macrophages were treated with DiD (Solarbio, Beijing, China)‐labeled liposomes for localizing Nano‐OM in the cells, and stained with 25 µM DiO (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) for 20 min for labeling the cell membranes and DAPI (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) for 5 min for labeling the nucleus; the fluorescence images were acquired on a confocal microscope (LSM900, Leica, Wetzlar, Hessen, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Nanoparticle Cellular Uptake and ROS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flow cytometry was used to study the cellular uptake of nanoparticles in vitro. 4T1 cells were seeded in 12-well plates at the density of 1 × 105 cells/well and incubated with either free ICG or the nanoparticles (ICG, 30 µg/mL) for 6 h. The cells were harvested and cell uptake determined from ICG fluorescence per cell using a BD FACSCalibur flow cytometer (Bedford, MA) and FlowJo software for analysis.
Intracellular ROS and hypoxia were measured using the ROS-ID® Hypoxia/Oxidative stress detection kit (Enzo Life Sciences). 4T1 cells were cultured in a 20-mm glass-bottom dish (Nest) (3 × 104 cells/dish) and grown in complete medium for 24 h before treatment. Cells were treated with free ICG, NP/IT and iNP/IT (ICG, 30 µg/mL) for 6 h and treated with the kit reagent mix according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After 30 min, the cells were washed twice and exposed to 808 nm laser irradiation for 3 min. Laser was placed on the top of dishes or plates during irradiation in all the cell experiment. After irradiation, cells were washed, stained by Hoechst 33258, and observed by LSM 710 laser scanning confocal microscope (Zeiss, Jena, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Cellular Uptake and Acidification Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
THP‐1 cells (2.4 × 105 cells) were seeded in a 20 mm glass bottom dish (NEST, Wuxi, China) and differentiated into macrophages as previously described. To examine the cellular uptake of M‐P12, macrophages were treated with DiD‐labelled M‐P12 (0.2 mg mL−1 phospholipid and 0.77 µg mL−1 DiD) overnight, and stained with DiO for 20 min and DAPI for 5 min to label the cell membrane and nucleus, respectively. The fluorescence images were acquired on a confocal microscope (LSM900, Leica, Wetzlar, Hessen, Germany).
To assess the endosomal acidification, macrophages were incubated with pHrodo red (10 µg mL−1) and fluorescein‐labelled dextran (20 µg mL−1) in the presence of nanomicelles (phospholipid: 0.2 mg mL−1) or chloroquine (CHQ, 30 µm) treatment for 6 h. Cells were then washed 3 times with PBS and imaged on a confocal microscope (LSM900, Leica, Wetzlar, Hessen, Germany). The fluorescence intensities of pHrodo red (ex: 565 nm; em: 585 nm) and fluorescein (ex: 488 nm; em: 525 nm) were quantified by Image J software. For each condition, at least 60 cells from 3 independent experiments were quantified to obtain the intensity ratio of fluorescein to pHrodo red.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!