The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Tecnai t12 microscope

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

The Tecnai T12 is a transmission electron microscope (TEM) designed for high-resolution imaging and analysis of materials and biological samples. It features a LaB6 electron source, a digital camera for image acquisition, and a range of imaging and analysis modes. The Tecnai T12 is capable of sub-Angstrom resolution and can be used for a variety of applications in materials science, nanotechnology, and life sciences.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

76 protocols using tecnai t12 microscope

1

Comparative TEM Analysis of S. aureus Cell Wall

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
S. aureus strains SH1000-B, SH1000-128, SH1000-128 mprF::Tn, LAC-B and LAC-128 were imaged by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) to compare differences in cell wall thickness, using a previously described method (Grigor’eva et al., 2020 (link)). Briefly, 1 ml of 18 h overnight cultures grown in TSB were pelleted and resuspended in 500 μl of 4% paraformaldehyde, 2.5% glutaraldehyde mixture. Samples were subsequently incubated at room temperature for 20 min before being pelleted and stored for 24 h at 4°C. Following this, samples were washed to remove fixative, postfixed in a 1% osmium tetroxide solution for 1 h and dehydrated in ethanol acetone. Samples were then embedded in an epon-araldite mixture and left to polymerize at 60°C for 24–48 h to obtain hard blocks. Blocks were sectioned (70 nm) using a Leica UC7 ultramicrotome and imaged using a FEI Tecnai T12 microscope at the Wolfson Bioimaging Facility, University of Bristol. For cell wall thickness analysis, 50 cells were measured for each strain, with each individual cell being measured in 4 equidistant locations before being averaged. Similarly, 50 cells were measured for each strain for the cell area analysis. The diameter was measured across 2 perpendicular planes before being averaged, the radius calculated, yielding cell area values by A = π r2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Ultrastructural Analysis of Mouse Pancreatic Islets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mouse pancreatic islets were isolated as previously described from 16 to 18-week-old male and female mice, tabulated separately. The islets were subsequently harvested in 1% NP-40 lysis buffer for evaluation of protein content for immunoblotting. For TEM, freshly isolated mouse pancreatic islets were placed immediately in 0.1 M cacodylate-buffer, pH 7.3, 2.5% glutaraldehyde, and 4% paraformaldehyde. After fixation for 2 h RT, the specimens were stored at 4 °C and later post-fixed for 1 h in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer, 1% OsO4. After rinsing in distilled water, the specimens were en bloc stained for 1 h in 1% uranyl acetate in distilled water. The specimens were dehydrated as follows: 30%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, and 95% ethanol for 10 min each, then three changes of 100% dry ethanol for 10 min each, followed by transfer into 100% propylene oxide (PPO) for 10 min. For resin infiltration, the specimens were transferred to 2:1 PPO/Epon 812 resin for 2 h, then to 1:1 PPO/resin overnight, then to 1:2 PPO/resin for 2 h, and to 100% resin for 3–4 h RT. The specimens were transferred to resin molds and placed at 60 °C for 48 h. Ultrathin (70-nm) sections were cut with a Leica Ultracut, picked up on copper grids, post-stained with lead citrate and viewed with a FEI Tecnai T12 microscope operating at 120 KV. Mitochondrial numbers were counted in a blinded fashion.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Evaluating PfCRT Fab Binding Interactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine the sample quality and success of the Fab binding, purified protein was diluted to 0.01 mg/ml (for PfCRT without Fab) or 0.005 mg/ml (for PfCRT with Fab) and applied onto copper grids (Ted Pella). These grids were overlaid by a thin (∼1.5 nm) layer of continuous carbon that had been plasma-cleaned (Gatan Solarus) for 30 s using a mixture of H2 and O2. Thereafter, filter paper (Whatman 4) was used to remove the protein solution. 3 μl of 2% uranyl formate was then added and immediately removed by absorbing with filter paper – this was repeated seven times. The grid was imaged on either a Tecnai T12 microscope (FEI) (for PfCRT without Fab) or a Tecnai TF20 microscope (FEI) (for PfCRT with Fab). Both microscopes were equipped with a Tietz F416 CCD camera (Tietz) at 1.23 Å or 1.10 Å per pixel respectively, using the Leginon software package40 . 166 and 87 images were collected respectively and were processed using the Appion software package41 to obtain 2D classes with Relion 2.142 ,43 . The micrographs showed good particle dispersion. 2D class averages showed that the Fab addition resulted in a clear fiducial for particle alignment (Extended Data Fig. 2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

SEC and Negative Stain EM Analysis of His6-FisB ECD

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For SEC analysis, His6-FisB ECD was loaded onto a Superose 6 Increase 10/300 GL column (GE, Chicago, IL, USA) previously equilibrated with 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 500 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM TCEP, 2% glycerol, 20 mM MgCl2, running at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min at 4°C. The column was calibrated with Bio-Rad’s Gel Filtration Standards. For negative stain EM analysis, 4 μL of the indicated elution fractions were applied to 200-mesh copper grids coated with approximately 10-nm amorphous carbon film, negatively stained with 2% (wt/vol) uranyl acetate, and air-dried. Images were collected on a FEI Tecnai T12 microscope, with a LaB6 filament operating at 120 kV, and equipped with a Gatan CCD camera.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Negative Staining for Fibril Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were prepared by loading 5 μl of fibril solution onto a glow-discharged 200 mesh carbon support film (Zhongjingkeyi Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing). The samples were held for 45 s and washed with double-distilled water followed by 3% uranyl acetate. The grid was then stained with 3% uranyl acetate for 45 s and allowed to dry in air. The samples were imaged by a Tecnai T12 microscope (FEI).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Structural Characterization of mTXNPx

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Reaction mixtures of mTXNPxred (10 µM) either alone or in complex with 1 µM of luciferase at 30 °C or 42 °C were either immediately or after incubation at 4 °C applied onto thin carbon layered 400-mesh copper grids (Pelco) as described54 (link), negatively stained with 0.75% uranyl formate (pH 5.5–6.0) and imaged at room temperature using a a Tecnai T12 Microscope (FEI) equipped with a LaB6 filament operated at 120 kV. Images were collected at 69444× magnification with a 2.2 Å/pixel spacing on a 4 k × 4 k CCD camera (Gatan). Particle images were selected EMAN2 software e2boxer on micrographs with similar stain thickness to estimate the number of decamers present in each micrograph.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Dual-axis Cryo-Electron Tomography

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Grids were mounted on a Model 2040 dual-axis tomography holder (Fischione Instruments; Export, PA) and imaged using a Tecnai T12 microscope (FEI; Hillsboro, OR) operated at full voltage and equipped with a Ultrascan US4000 4k CCD camera (Gatan; Abingdon, UK). Acquisition of dual-axis tilt series was controlled using SerialEM software (Mastronarde, 2005 (link)). Tilt-series were typically collected over a tilt range of ±60° with 2° increments, at calibrated unbinned pixel sizes of 0.456 nm (26kx magnification) or 0.514 nm (21kx magnification), with a defocus of 0.8 μm. Tomograms were reconstructed from tilt series by weighted back-projection using the IMOD package, version 4.9 (Kremer et al., 1996 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Microtubule Binding Assay Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Continuous carbon grids (200–400 mesh copper, Quantifoil) were glow-discharged (PELCO EasiGlow, 15 mA, 0.39 mBar, 30 s). Samples (3 – 5 μL) were stained with 0.75% uranyl formate as described previously29 (link). Images were collected with a Tecnai T12 microscope (FEI Company, Hillsboro, USA) with a LaB6 filament, operated at 120 kV, and data was captured with a Gatan Ultrascan CCD camera (Gatan, Inc., Pleasanton, USA). For MT-binding assays, reactions were prepared on grids and incubated for 2 min. MTs were used at a concentration of 1 μM αβ-Tubulin in pre-formed MTs. LEM2 constructs were imaged with MTs (Fig. 2F), at the following concentrations: 6 μM LEM2FL, 4 μM LEM2NTD, 200 μM LEM2145–165 (LEM2-PRA), 80 μM LEM2188–212 (LEM2-PRB). Reactions of MTs with LEM2NTD or LEM2188–212, to corroborate turbidimetry, were prepared as described above. Phosphomimetic constructs, LEM2Mim1 and LEM2Mim2, were tested for MT-bundling at 8 μM.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Cryo-EM Imaging of Antibody-Antigen Complexes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
VRC38 IgG or monovalent Fab was incubated overnight in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) containing 50mM Tris, 150mM NaCl, pH 7.4) at room temperature with BG505 or B41 SOSIP.664 gp140 trimers (Pugach et al., 2015 (link)) at a 10× molar excess of mAb. Samples were then diluted to ~0.01mg/ml in TBS and applied to a plasma-cleaned carbon-coated Cu400 mesh grid (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA) for about 10 seconds. Nano-W stain (NanoProbes, Inc., Yaphank, NY) was applied for 7 seconds, blotted with filter paper, and a fresh drop applied for an additional 15 seconds before blotting. Image collection and data processing was performed as described elsewhere (de Taeye et al., 2015 (link)) on either an FEI Tecnai T12 microscope (2.05 Å/pixel; 52,000× magnification) or FEI Talos microscope (1.57Å/pixel; 92,000× magnification). 2D class averages for these datasets and other data (Doria-Rose et al., 2014 (link); Julien et al., 2013 (link); Sok et al., 2014 (link)) were generated by Iterative MSA/MRA (Ogura et al., 2003 (link)) or SPARX ISAC methods (Yang et al., 2012 (link)). Figures were created using UCSF Chimera (Petterson et al., 2004 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Cryo-EM Analysis of B1-scFv/B2-Fab Fusion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The samples B1-scFv/B2- Fab fusion and its complex with Ub-pY59 were negatively stained and observed on a Tecnai T12 microscope and a Tecnai T20 microscope (FEI Company) using the discharged continuous carbon grids as previously described,47 (link),48 respectively. Images were acquired at room temperature with a pixel size of 2.21 Å/pixel (T12, operated at 120 kV) or 3.319 Å/pixel (T20, operated at 200 kV) on the level of specimen using a 4K × 4K CCD camera (UltraScan 4000, Gatan Inc.). After all micrographs were visually screened, the contrast transfer function (CTF) was estimated for each micrograph by Gctf.49 (link) The particle was selected using the Gautomatch (https://www.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/kzhang/Gautomatch) without template. Individual particles were extracted from the raw images with the 100 × 100 pixel window for T12 images or 80 × 80 pixel window for T20 images and were subjected to 25 cycles of 2D classification with a mask diameter of 200 Å for B1-scFv/B2-Fab or 220 Å for its complex with Ub-pY59 in Relion 3.0.50 (link) The output 2D averages after several rounds were analyzed by comparing with the available protein structures utilized in this design.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!