The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss 23.0 statistics software

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS 23.0 is a comprehensive and user-friendly statistical software package developed by IBM. It provides a wide range of analytical tools and techniques for data analysis, modeling, and visualization. The software is designed to help users efficiently manage, analyze, and interpret complex data sets across various industries and research fields.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

13 protocols using spss 23.0 statistics software

1

Parenteral Nutrition's Impact on Weight Gain

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We examined the differences in weight gain between those who took supplemental PN (67 patients with PN) and those who received oral intake only (62 patients without PN) during hospitalization. To compare nutritional therapy between the groups, independent t-tests were applied for the continuous variables and the Chi-squared test was used for the categorical variables. The effects of PN on the medical findings at discharge were examined with the repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) model according to the group (patients with PN and patients without PN) and period (admission and discharge) including initial BMI as a covariate. Paired t-tests were used for the group-specific comparisons of medical findings between the periods. For comparisons of the BMI and rate of weight gain between the groups, ANOVA with a block design was applied to control for the effect of subtypes as the restriction type was higher in the PN group. The effect sizes were calculated with Cohen’s d [26 ] or partial eta-squared (Δη2), if appropriate. Δη2 was interpreted as described as small (<0.01), medium (<0.059), or large (<0.138) [26 ].
All data were analyzed with SPSS 23.0 statistics software (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23.0. IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA). The level of significance was set at p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Statistical Analysis Methods Comparison

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed by the Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS) 23.0 statistics software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, United States), GraphPad Prism 8 software (San Diego, CA, United States), and Rv4.0.3 software. Each sample was repeated at least three times. If data were normally distributed, they are represented as mean ± standard deviation. When more than two groups were included, a one-way analysis of variance was utilized. Differences were considered statistically when P value was less than 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comparative Evaluation of Novel Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All quantitative values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (x ± SD). GraphPad Prism Software (Version 7.0, Inc., La Jolla, CA, United States) and SPSS 23.0 statistics software (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, United States) were employed. Data analyses were performed with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s multiple-comparisons test. The distribution normality of all datasets was evaluated by Shapiro-Wilk test. p values <0.05 (two-sides) were considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Analytical Data Treatment Methodology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All measurements were carried out three-fold (n = 3) with the exception of mechanical properties carried out five-fold (n = 5). Analytical data were treated using the SPSS 23.0 Statistics software (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) as described by Papapetros et al. [17 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Importance-Performance Analysis of IPA Model

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The analysis was performed with IBM SPSS 23.0 Statistics software (IBM Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), setting the critical level of significance at p < 0.05. The descriptive data are described as mean and standard deviation. Kolmogorov Smirnoff analysis showed a non-normal behavior of variables. Therefore, non-parametric tests were performed. A Wilcoxon test was used for inference analysis in comparisons between importance and performance, while a Spearman test was applied for correlational analyses. The sociodemographic variables considered were gender and age. Regarding the IPA model, the data interpretation was based on Ábalo et al. [30 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Clinicopathological Evaluation of Skin Lesions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The evaluation has been made basing on the unit of measurement “patient”, since all the patients had only one lesion in the moment of diagnosis. The descriptive statistic was performed using frequencies and percentages for the categorical variables and averages and standard deviations for the quantitative variables. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to verify the normality of age variance. Contingency tables were drawn up using the Chi-squared test. The analytical statistic was performed by comparing the variables using the ANOVA test for independent samples. Cohen’s Kappa index was calculated to determine the degree of agreement between the clinical and histopathological diagnosis. All of the divergences in which the value of p was less than or equal to 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. The SPSS 23.0 statistics software was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Geographical Origin Determination of Graviera Cheese

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Analytical data were treated using the SPSS 23.0 Statistics software [42 ]. Comparison of the means was achieved by MANOVA in order to determine those parameters that are significant in differentiating cheeses according to geographical origin. The independent variable was the geographical origin, while CQPs (pH, TA, moisture, protein, fat dwb, ash), FAs, VCs, and minerals were taken as the dependent variables. Pillai’s trace and Wilk’s lambda indices were computed in order to determine possible significant effects of conventional quality, chromatographic parameter, and element values on the geographical origins of graviera cheeses. LDA was then applied using the selected dependent variables to explore the possibility of classifying cheeses according to geographical origin. Both the original and leave-one-out cross validation methods were used to test the prediction ability. Cross validation is a more conservative method for correct classification, but at the same time is a more reliable one. In addition, the homogeneity of the variability was tested by application of the Box M index [43 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comparative Analysis of Eating Disorders

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The demographic and clinical characteristics of the participants were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a post-hoc Scheffe comparison using the NW group as the reference group. To test for the differences in biochemical and hematologic parameters, and BMD among the groups (UW, OW, AN, and BN groups), we used the logistic regression model with the group as the response variable and the NW group as the reference. Statistical significance was set at the 5% level (p < 0.05). All data were analyzed by SPSS 23.0 statistics software (SPSS Inc., New York, NY, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Associations between Dietary, Health, and Psychological Factors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To examine the association between dietary behaviors, food intake, health behaviors, and psychological features, and the group (UW, OW, AN, and BN groups), we used the logistic regression model and the group as a response variable with the NW group as the reference. If an independent variable was categorical, the last category of the variable was used as a reference category in logistic regression analysis. Statistical significance was set at the 5% level (p < 0.05). We used two-sided p-values and a 95% confidence interval (CI). All data were analyzed by SPSS 23.0 statistics software (SPSS Inc., New York, NY, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Mediating Role of Coping in Job Stress and Subjective Well-being

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Demographics and work characteristics, job stress, affect, and life satisfaction were analyzed using descriptive statistics. To determine the mediation effect, we identified the relationships between the variables. To do this, the variables of job stress, coping, affect, and life satisfaction were analyzed using a Pearson’s correlation coefficient. We used Hayes’s PROCESS macro and a modal 4 bootstrap method to examine the mediating effect of coping in the relationship between job stress and SWB. Unlike a causal statistical approach, the PROCESS macro approach offers indirect mediating effects and can be applied to a small sample size [27 (link), 28 (link)]. In the first step, we defined job stress as a dependent variable (X) and SWB (PA, NA, life satisfaction) as an independent variable (Y) (Fig. 1). In the second step, we tested the mediating effect of X on Y (a × b) and obtained a 95% CI. If the 95% CI did not cross zero, there was a significant mediating effect. For this study, we assumed that SWB includes three elements: PA, NA, and life satisfaction, based on our literature review. We therefore analyzed the mediating effects to determine if there is a correlation among the factors (such as job stress), the sub-categories of coping, and any of the three SWB elements. For data analysis, we used SPSS 23.0 statistics software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!