The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

16 protocols using cytoflex srt

1

Evaluating Drug-Induced Cell Viability, Iron Levels, and ROS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were cultured in 96-well plates in 5% CO2 incubator. The medium containing the drug was replaced and add 10 microliters of CCK-8 solution (C0038, Beyotime) to each well. A blank control can be used with the corresponding amount of medium and CCK-8 added but no cells. The cells were then incubated in the cell incubator for 1.5 hours. Absorbance was measured at 450nm through Multifunctional Enzyme Labeler (SpectraMax i3).
Cells were inoculated in fluorescent culture dishes and incubated overnight in 5% CO2 incubator. The medium containing the drug was replaced, and FerroOrange working liquid (F374- DOJINDO) with a concentration of 1 μmol/l was added and incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 incubator for 30 minutes. Fluorescent was observed under a fluorescence microscope.
To detect the level of reactive oxygen species (ROS), the medium was removed and DCFH-DA (10μmol/l, S0033S, Beyotime) was added and incubated in the incubator at 37°C for 20 minutes. The cells were washed to fully remove the excess DCFH-DA. ROS level was detected through flow cytometry (BECKMAN COULTER- CytoFLEX SRT).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Isolation and Sorting of Fluorescent Zebrafish Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
F1 NRE-eGFP/HS5-mCherry embryos, and WT embryos, were collected and treated with PTU as described. At 48 hpf, embryos were anaesthetised with Tricaine (20–30 mg/liter) and placed into Danieau’s solution (Sprague et al, 2008 (link)). Eyes were dissected from ∼100–150 embryos using fine forceps (#5SF; Dumont), and immediately placed into Danieau’s solution on ice. Samples were centrifuged at 300g for 1 min at 4°C, and then washed with Danieau’s solution. The washing step was carried out three times with Danieau’s solution, and once with FACSmax (Amsbio). In a final 500-μl FACSmax, the samples were passed through a 35-μm cell strainer to obtain single-cell suspension (on ice). Samples were sorted for mCherry and eGFP fluorescence using a FACS Aria II (BD) or CytoFLEX SRT (Beckman Coulter) machine. Forward and side scatter sorting was used to select single cells from clumps and debris, and DAPI staining was used to exclude dead cells. A WT sample was used as a negative control for eGFP and mCherry fluorescence to set the gates for sorting. Cells single positive for eGFP were selected for the eGFP samples. Because of the smaller population of mCherry-positive cells, the yield of mCherry samples was increased by sorting cells single positive for mCherry or double positive.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Annexin V-FITC Apoptosis Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cells were seeded into a 6-well culture plate at a density of 5 × 105 cells/dish and incubated for 48 h at 37 °C and 5% CO2. After incubation, the cells were stripped and washed twice with a cold PBS buffer. The apoptotic effects were analyzed using the Annexin V Apoptosis Detection Kit II (BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA, USA), which contains the buffer-binding Annexin V-FITC and the PI staining buffer.
Briefly, the cells were resuspended in 1 ml of binding buffer to give a concentration of 1 × 106 cells/ml. Next, 100 µL of suspensions (1 × 105 cells/mL) was transferred to 5 mL test tubes and the Annexin V-FITC (5 µL) and PI (5 µL) dyes were added. The mixture was incubated for 15 min at room temperature in the dark. After this time, the 400 µL binding buffer was added. Cell apoptosis was quantified using a CytoFlex Srt flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Miami, FL, USA) and the dedicated CytExpert Srt software Version 1.1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying NCL-induced Leishmania Amastigotes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RAW264.7 macrophage cells were infected with stationary phase L. donovani DD8-GFP promastigotes at 1: 10 ratio in DMEM media with 2% FBS. After 2 h incubation the cells were washed with 1× PBS to remove non-internalized parasites and infected cells were sorted based on green fluorescence of GFP in CytoFLEX SRT (Beckman Coulter). The sorted cells were seeded in 6-well plates for an additional 24 h with fresh complete media to convert promastigotes to amastigotes and thereafter treated with 10 μM NCL for 6 h, 24 h, and 48 h, and microscopic images were taken. The percentage of infected macrophages was obtained by flow cytometry analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Cardiac Cell Suspension Isolation and Sorting

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cardiac cell suspensions were prepared as described with modifications 17 (link), 18 (link). In brief, mouse hearts were removed, cut into small pieces, and digested with 2 mg/mL collagenase II and 0.5 mg/mL dispase II for 30 min at 37 °C. The mixture was filtered with a 100 μm filter to remove tissue blocks in the cell dissociation solution. The mixture was then centrifuged at 1000 × g for 5 min, and was resuspended with PBS. Cardiac cells were sorted using flow cytometry (Beckman CytoFLEX SRT, Brea, CA, USA) into populations of CD45- PDGFR-α- CD31- cardiomyocytes, CD45- PDGFR-α+ CFs, CD45- CD31+ endothelial cells, and CD45+ F4/80+ macrophages. Isolated cells used for RNA extraction and q-PCR analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Characterization of Ins1E Cells and CRISPR Knockouts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
No cell lines used in this study were found in the database of commonly misidentified cell lines (maintained by ICLAC and NCBI Biosample). Ins1E cells were regularly tested negative for mycoplasma contamination (Eurofins) and their identity confirmed by functional insulin secretion assays, qPCR, immunofluorescence stainings and western blots for β-cell marker mRNAs/proteins. Ins1E cells (including knockout cell lines) were cultivated in RPMI 1640 with 10% FCS, 2 mM Glutamax, 10 mM HEPES, 2 mM Na-pyruvate, 0.18 mM 2-mercaptoethanol and 100 U ml−1 penicillin–streptomycin (all Thermo Fisher). CRISPR knockout lines were engineered according to a double single guide RNA (sgRNA) strategy29 using the PX459 plasmid or a modified PX458 plasmid55 (link). pSpCas9(BB)−2A-GFP (PX458) and pSpCas9(BB)−2A-Puro (PX459) were a gift from Feng Zhang (Addgene plasmids #48138 and #48139). Positive clones were enriched using either puromycin selection or FACS sorting using a FACSAria III (BD Biosciences, running FACSDiva software) or a Cytoflex SRT (Beckman Coulter, running CytExpert software). Monoclonal colonies were grown until near confluency in a 96-well plate, and after passaging, knockout was confirmed using deletion PCR, qPCR and/or immunoblot. At least three monoclonal cell lines were pooled before experiments56 (link), if not denoted otherwise in the figure legends.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Isolation and Purification of Primary Mouse Hepatocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Primary mouse hepatocytes were isolated by the previously reported method with minor modification.[46] Briefly, the WT and LKO mice were anesthetized with Avertin (Sigma–Aldrich, T48402, 240 mg kg−1) by intraperitoneal injection, and the hepatic portal vein was cannulated. The liver was perfused at 6 mL min−1 with pre‐warmed perfusion medium containing EGTA for 8 min. After the first wash, a second perfusion was performed with prewarmed digestion medium containing collagenase IV at 4 mL min−1 for 5 min. Hepatocytes were filtered through a 100 mm filter membrane, separated by centrifugation at low speed (50 g, 5 min), and purified with Percoll (Sigma–Aldrich, P4937) gradient centrifugation. For cell sorting, Isolated hepatocytes sent to FACS, sorting was performed at 4 °C and samples were collected in growth media (high‐glucose DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), and 1% penicillin/streptomycin). Only GFP‐positive cells were sorted with Cytoflex SRT (Beckman Coulter, Pasadena, CA, USA) using a 100‐mm nozzle. Sorted cells were immediately centrifuged and resuspended in RNAiso Plus (Takara, 9018) for total RNA isolation or RIPA lysis buffer (Beyotime, P0013B) for immunoblotting assay.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

CEACAM5 and CD47 Expression in Cancer Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CEACAM5-positive colorectal, lung, or gastric cancer cell lines were purchased from ATCC (SK-CO-1, SNU-C1, H508, LS174T, SNU-16, H727, H2122) or DSMZ (MKN-45), and cultured according to the respective datasheets. CEACAM5-negative A549 cells (ATCC), and two primary epithelial cell lines, i.e., HBEpiC (ScienCell Research Laboratories) and CCD841CoN (ATCC), were used as controls. The number of CEACAM5 and CD47 antigens/cell was determined by QIFIKIT (Agilent DAKO) according to the manufacturer’s instruction as previously described (41 (link)).
MC38 (Kerafast) were silenced for mouse CD47 cell surface expression and were afterwards stably transfected to express human CD47 and human CEACAM5. A stable clone named 3C12 was isolated by cell sorting (Beckman #Cytoflex SRT) and cultured like mentioned in the original MC38 datasheet. The number of human CEACAM5 (203’000 molecules/cell) and human CD47 (40’000 molecules/cell) expressed at the surface of the clone was determined by QIFIKIT (Agilent DAKO) according to the manufacturer’s instruction as previously described (41 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Macrophage Polarization by AnCar-Exo

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The BMDM was seeded in 35 mm‐confocal dishes at the density of 2 × 105 cells with complete medium containing nothing or 100 ng ml−1 LPS and 50 ng ml−1 INF‐γ or 10 ng ml−1 IL‐4 for 24 h. The complete medium was then replaced with complete medium containing 10% exosome‐depleted FBS and incubated with 1 × 108 AnCar‐ExoLaIMTS3 for 12 h at 37 °C. Later, Collected the Mφ, pro‐inflammatory and anti‐inflammatory macrophages and resuspended them with FACS buffer (PBS containing 1% FBS, 1 mM EDTA). Next, prepared for blank control, and Isotype control for the following analysis. Incubated with antibodies against F4/80, CD86, CD206 (1:100, Biolegend) at 4 °C for 30 min. Then, washed with FACS buffer. The cells were centrifuged at 500 g for 5 min. At last, over 50 000 events were collected for analyzing by Flow cytometry (Beckman, CytoFLEX SRT).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Isolation and Characterization of Naive CD8+ T Cell Subsets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total CD8+ Tn were purified using MagniSort™ Human CD8+ Naïve T cell Enrichment Kit (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA). CCR7+CD45RA+CD95CD8+ Tn were sorted into CD5lo and CD5hi subsets (based on the lower or upper 20% of CD5 expression) using CytoFLEX SRT (Beckman Coulter). For some experiments, purified cells were labelled with 2.5 μM of Cell Trace™ Violet (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA) or Carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (ThermoFisher). Purified cells were cultured in anti-CD3 (5 μg/ml) (clone OKT3; eBioscience) and anti-CD28 (2 μg/ml) (clone CD28.2; Invitrogen) coated Clear Flat-Bottom Immuno Nonsterile 96-Well Plate (ThermoFisher) for indicated time points. In some experiments, 10 ng/ml of cytokines (human IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-7, IL-10, IL-12, IL-15, IL-18, IL-21, IL-23, TGF-β, IFN-β, IFN-γ, or GM-CSF; PeproTech, Cranbury, NJ, USA) were supplemented in the culture.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!