The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

20 protocols using wheat germ extract

1

Luciferase Assay Protocol in Wheat Germ

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For luciferase assays, 300-400 ng of RNA were translated in wheat germ extract (Promega). Reactions were assembled on ice according to the manufacturer’s instructions, except that they were scaled down to 10 μL. Reactions were pre-incubated at 17°C for 5 min and then shifted to the assay temperature for another 15 min. Reaction was stopped by addition of 40 μL stopping solution (1 x PBS, 0.1 μM cycloheximide, 1 x protease inhibitor cocktail). An equal volume of luciferin solution (2 mM D-luciferin, 0.1 mM ATP) was added and FLUC activity was subsequently monitored using a TriStar LB 941 microplate reader (Berthold Technologies).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

FtsY-Dependent Protein Translocation Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Assays were carried out as described (Shan et al., 2007 (link); Shen et al., 2012 (link)). In brief, 10 μL of in vitro translation reactions of pPL in Wheat Germ extract (Promega) containing 35S-methionine were initiated and, within 3 min of initiation, added to a mixture of 200 nM Ffh, 400 nM 4.5S RNA, 0, 14, 36, 71, 214 nM wildtype or mutant FtsY, and 0.5 eq/μL of salt-washed, trypsin-digested microsomal membrane to a total volume of <15 μL. Reactions were quenched by adding 2X SDS-loading buffer and boiling and analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by autoradiography. The data were fit to: %translocation= Vmax[FtsY]K1/2+[FtsY] ,
in which Vmax is the maximum translocation efficiency at saturating concentrations of FtsY, and K1/2 is the concentration of FtsY required to reach half of Vmax .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative RNA-protein Binding Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
gtZfL2-2p and the TBR and TX series of mutants were synthesized by in vitro translation with wheat-germ extract (Promega) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Various stem-loop RNAs were synthesized by in vitro transcription (TaKaRa) according to the manufacturer's instructions. First, a synthesized protein and 10 fmol of a stem-loop RNA and 2 μg of yeast tRNA were incubated for 10 min at room temperature in 20 μl of 25 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.8, containing 200 mM NaCl and 0.1% (w/v) Tween 20 and including 150 μg protein G-coupled Dynabeads (Invitrogen). Second, the beads were washed five times with 200 μl of 25 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.8, containing 50 mM NaCl and then collected using a magnet and resuspended in 10 μl of this same buffer. Third, the beads were incubated at 80°C for 5 min, and 1 μl was used for reverse transcription with PrimeScript RT (TaKaRa). Finally, each PCR product was subjected to quantitative RT-PCR using SYBR Premix Ex TaqII (TaKaRa).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

In Vitro Packaging of Bluetongue Virus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The CFA packaging assay was carried out as described previously (Lourenco & Roy, 2011 (link)). Briefly, VP1, VP4, VP6, VP3 and VP7 were in vitro translated sequentially using wheatgerm extract (Promega) and mixed with the 10 BTV uncapped ssRNAs to form viral cores. The whole mixture was then fractionated through a continuous sucrose gradient and tested for RNA content. In relevant fractions, unpackaged RNAs were eliminated by RNase One (Promega) digestion. Packaged ssRNAs were detected by reverse transcription PCR using primers for S4 of BTV-9 as described above (for Fig. 5) or S4 of BTV-9 5′ and 3′ end primers: SBF1-T7-S4-BTV9, 5′-AAAACCTGCAGGTAATACGACTCACTATAGTTAAAACATGCCTGAGCCAC-3′; S4-BTV9-terminus, 5′-GTAAGTTTTACATGCCCCCC-3′ (for Fig. 7). Primers for S8 of BTV-1 were: for reverse transcription reaction of S8, B1S8R 5′-GTAAGTGTAAAATCCCCC-3′; for detection of S8, B1S8F 5′-GTTAAAAAATCCTTGAGTCATGGAG-3′; B1S8 627R, 5′-CAGCTTCTCCAATCTGCTGG-3′.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

In vitro Synthesis of MgtE Fragments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Reference fragments of B. subtilis MgtE encompassing the first 300, 315, 330, 340, 355 and 370 residues of MgtE were generated by PCR amplification of the respective coding regions from B. subtilis 168 genomic DNA, and in vitro‐transcribed and in vitro‐translated as described previously (Lemberg & Martoglio, 2003; Strisovsky et al, 2009). Briefly, PCR was performed using set of mgtE‐specific primers containing SP6 RNA polymerase promoter and ribosome‐binding site in the forward primer, and stop codon in the reverse primer. Messenger RNAs were purified by LiCl precipitation and translated using Wheat Germ Extract (Promega). The resulting crude translation mixtures containing the MgtE reference fragments were separated using SDS–PAGE and visualised by polyclonal anti‐MgtE(2–275) antibody and immunoblotting.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

In vitro Translation of Viral RNAs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Plasmids containing full-length CYVaV (pUC19-CYVaV) or PEMV2 (pUC19-PEMV2) were linearized with Hind III or SmaI, respectively, and served as templates for RNA transcription using T7 RNA polymerase. Quantification of the synthesized RNA was performed using a DeNovix DS-II FX spectrophotometer. For in vitro translation, 10 μL translation mixtures contained 5 μL wheat germ extract (Promega), 0.5 pmol RNA template, 0.8 μL 1 mM amino acids mix (without methione), 100 mM potassium acetate and 0.5 μL (5 μCi) 35S-methionine. The translation mixture was incubated at 25 °C for 45 min and then resolved on a 10% SDS-PAGE gel. The gel was dried and exposed to Fuji phosphorimager screen for 3 h. The screen was subsequently scanned by an Amersham Typhoon fluorescent image analyzer. The intensity of radioactive bands was quantified using ImageQuant TL 8.1 (GE Lifesciences). All experiments were repeated at least three times.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

In Vitro Protein Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 0.5 to 2 μg of purified RNA were translated using wheat germ extract (Promega) at 25°C for 90 min in a final reaction volume of 12.5 μl according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Protein output was analyzed via Western blotting as described above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

In vitro Translocation of ProOmpA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ProOmpA mRNA was in vitro transcribed and purified as described previously (Behrmann et al., 1998 (link)). ProOmpA was translated using wheat germ extract (Promega) in the presence of [35S]methionine (1.5 mCi/ml) at 26°C for 30 min, followed by incubation with U-IMVs at 37°C for 15 min in the presence of 10 mM phosphocreatine, 0.05 mg/ml creatine kinase, 4 mM Mg(OAc)2, 2 mM ATP, 0.5 mg/ml BSA, 10 mM DTT, and the indicated concentrations of SecA. Samples were digested with 0.1 mg/ml proteinase K on ice for 15 min. Digestion was stopped by addition of 5 mM PMSF. All samples were precipitated by TCA and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

In Vitro Translocation Efficiency Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Assays were performed as described (Lee et al., 2018 (link)). Briefly, 8.5 µl of in vitro translation reactions of pPL in wheat germ extract (Promega) containing 35S-methionine were initiated and, within 3 min, added to a mixture of 30 nM SRP; 0, 5, 10, 40, or 100 nM WT or mutant SR; and 0.5 eq/µl of salt-washed, trypsin-digested microsomal membrane (TKRM) to a total volume of <13.5 µl. Reactions were quenched by addition of 2× SDS-loading buffer and boiling after 40 min and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography. The efficiency of translocation was quantified from Eq. 1, in which PL and pPL are the integrated intensities for prolactin and preprolactin bands from autoradiography:
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

In Vitro Translation of mRNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In vitro translation was carried out using increasing concentrations of mRNA transcripts with self-made untreated RRL, amino acid mixture containing all the amino acids except methionine (1 mM of each), RNasin (Promega ), 75 mM KCl, 0.5 mM MgCl2, 3.8 mCi [35S] methionine, and autoclaved milli-Q water. Reaction mixture was incubated at 30°C for 1 hr. Aliquots of translation mixture were analysed by SDS-PAGE (10%) (Laemmli, 1970 (link)) and translation products were visualized by phosphor imaging. In vitro translation assays with wheat germ extract (Promega) were performed according to manufacturer’s instructions. In vitro translation assays with HeLa cell extract and Drosophila S2 cell extract were performed as previously described (Thoma et al., 2004 (link); Wakiyama et al., 2006 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!