The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Bergamo 2 microscope

Manufactured by Thorlabs
Sourced in United States

The Bergamo II microscope is a high-performance microscope designed for advanced imaging applications. It features a modular design, allowing for customization to suit various research and industrial needs. The Bergamo II provides exceptional optical quality and advanced imaging capabilities.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

17 protocols using bergamo 2 microscope

1

Two-Photon Imaging of Neuronal Activity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two photon imaging was performed on a Bergamo II microscope (Thorlabs) running Scanimage (Pologruto et al., 2003 (link)) (Vidrio Technologies) with 940nm or 1050nm dispersion-compensated excitation provided by an Insight DS+ (Spectraphysics). For axon imaging, power after the objective was limited to a maximum of 60 mW, dependent on depth. Locations were selected for imaging on the basis of their position relative to large blood vessels, responsiveness to visual stimulation, and lack of prolonged calcium transients resulting from over-expression of GCaMP6s. Images were collected at 30 Hz using bidirectional scanning with 512×512 pixel resolution. Images were collected at 512×512 pixel resolution with fields of view 100 (GCaMP6s) or 200 (jRGECO1a) μm on a side.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Silencing VIP Neurons with Optogenetics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To silence VIP neurons, we used a 594-nm laser (OBIS 594 LS 100 mW, Coherent). We modified the Bergamo II microscope (Thorlabs) to combine optogenetic manipulation with two-photon calcium imaging. A lens (LA1805-B, Thorlabs) was placed in the optogenetic stimulation light path to defocus the light at the imaging plane. We used a dichroic mirror (DMBP740B, Thorlabs) to combine two-photon laser and optogenetic stimulation light, and a second dichroic mirror (FF555-Di03–25×36, Semrock) to split the green fluorescent protein (GFP) emission from both the two-photon and optogenetic light sources. The laser for optogenetic stimulation was synchronized to the resonant scanner turnaround points (when data were not acquired) to minimize light leak from the monitor (Attinger et al., 2017 (link)) and therefore flickered at twice the frequency of the resonant scanner. Trials with optogenetic stimulation, the laser was turned on 1 s before the visual stimulus and turned off 1 s after the offset of the visual stimulus. For all opsins, the average 594-nm laser power under the objective was typically set to a constant value of 15 mW (not exceeding 18 mW) throughout the trial.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Two-Photon Imaging of Biosensors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two-photon excitation of both biosensors was provided by the beam of an optical parametric oscillator (MPX Chameleon Compact OPO, Coherent, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) tuned to 1025 nm, coupled to the Bergamo II microscope (Thorlabs, Inc.) and fed by a femtosecond pulsed Titanium-sapphire pump laser (Chameleon Ultra II Laser, Coherent, Inc.). The microscope was equipped with a water immersion objective designed for multiphoton imaging (XLPLN25XWMP2, 25×, NA 1.05, Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). Fluorescence emission signals were selected by band-pass filters (612/69 nm, Cat. No. FF01-612/69-25, Semrock, for R-CEPIA1er; 525/40 nm, Cat. No. FF02-525/40-25, Semrock, for CEPIA2mt) and detected by cooled GaAsP photomultiplier modules (Cat. No. H7422-40, Hamamatsu Photonics K.K., Shizuoka, Japan). Images were acquired simultaneously in these two emission channels at 3 frames/s (Hz).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Two-photon Microscopy of Neural Structures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two-photon imaging was performed using a Bergamo II microscope (Thorlabs) running Scanimage (Vidrio Technologies) with 940 nm dispersion-compensated excitation provided by an Insight DS+ (Spectraphysics). For spine and axon imaging, power after the objective was limited to <50 mW. Images were collected at 30 Hz using bidirectional scanning with 512 × 512 pixel resolution or with custom ROIs (region of interest; framerate range: 22 – 50 Hz). Somatic imaging was performed with a resolution of 0.488 – 0.098 µm/pixel. Dendritic spine imaging was performed with a resolution of 0.164 – 0.065 µm/pixel.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Two-photon Imaging of Neurons

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two-photon imaging was performed using a Bergamo II microscope (Thorlabs) running Scanimage (Vidrio Technologies) with 940 nm dispersion-compensated excitation provided by an Insight DS+ (Spectraphysics). For spine and axon imaging, power after the objective was limited to <50 mW. Images were collected at 30 Hz using bidirectional scanning with 512 × 512 pixel resolution or with custom ROIs (region of interest; framerate range: 22 – 50 Hz). Somatic imaging was performed with a resolution of 0.488 – 0.098 μm/pixel. Dendritic spine imaging was performed with a resolution of 0.164 – 0.065 μm/pixel.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Two-Photon Imaging of Neuronal Structures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two photon imaging was performed on a Bergamo II microscope (Thorlabs) running Scanimage36 2015 or 2016 (Vidrio Technologies) with 940nm dispersion-compensated excitation provided by an Insight DS+ (Spectraphysics). For spine and axon imaging, power after the objective was limited to <60 mW, dependent on depth. Cells were selected for imaging on the basis of their position relative to large blood vessels, responsiveness to visual stimulation, and lack of prolonged calcium transients resulting from overexpression of GCaMP6s. Images were collected at 30 Hz using bidirectional scanning with 512×512 pixel resolution. Images of somata ranged from 50 to 100 μm on a side, while images of dendrites were ~ 40μm on a side. Images of axons were collected at 512×512 pixel resolution with fields of view ~100μm on a side.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Two-Photon Imaging in Neurophysiology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two-photon imaging was performed on a Bergamo II microscope (Thorlabs) running Scanimage33 (version 5, Vidrio Technologies) with 940 nm dispersion-compensated excitation provided by an Insight DS+ (Spectraphysics). For spine and axon imaging, power after the objective was limited to <50 mW. Cells were selected for imaging on the basis of their position relative to large blood vessels, responsiveness to visual stimulation, and lack of prolonged calcium transients resulting from over-expression of GCaMP6s. Images were collected at 30 Hz using bidirectional scanning with 512×512 pixel resolution or with custom ROIs (region of interest; framerate range: 22 – 50 Hz). Somatic imaging was performed with a resolution of 2.05 – 10.24 pixels/ μm. Dendritic spine imaging was performed with a resolution of 6.10 −15.36 pixels/μm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Two-Photon Imaging of Neuronal Structures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two-photon imaging was performed on a Bergamo II microscope (Thorlabs) running Scanimage (Pologruto et al., 2003 (link); Vidrio Technologies) with 940 nm dispersion-compensated excitation provided by an Insight DS+ (Spectraphysics). For spine and axon imaging, power after the objective was limited to <50 mW. Cells were selected for imaging on the basis of their position relative to large blood vessels, responsiveness to visual stimulation, and lack of prolonged calcium transients resulting from over-expression of GCaMP6s. Images were collected at 30 Hz using bidirectional scanning with 512 × 512 pixel resolution or with custom ROIs (frame rate range: 22–50 Hz). Somatic imaging was performed with a resolution of 2.05–10.24 pixels/micron. Dendritic spine imaging was performed with a resolution of 6.10–15.36 pixels/micron.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Two-Photon Imaging of Neuronal Structures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two photon imaging was performed on a Bergamo II microscope (Thorlabs) running Scanimage36 2015 or 2016 (Vidrio Technologies) with 940nm dispersion-compensated excitation provided by an Insight DS+ (Spectraphysics). For spine and axon imaging, power after the objective was limited to <60 mW, dependent on depth. Cells were selected for imaging on the basis of their position relative to large blood vessels, responsiveness to visual stimulation, and lack of prolonged calcium transients resulting from overexpression of GCaMP6s. Images were collected at 30 Hz using bidirectional scanning with 512×512 pixel resolution. Images of somata ranged from 50 to 100 μm on a side, while images of dendrites were ~ 40μm on a side. Images of axons were collected at 512×512 pixel resolution with fields of view ~100μm on a side.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Two-Photon Imaging of Neural Structures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two-photon imaging was performed using a Bergamo II microscope (Thorlabs) running Scanimage (ver. 5, Vidrio Technologies) with 940-nm dispersion-compensated excitation provided by an Insight DS+ (Spectraphysics). For spine and axon imaging, power after the objective was limited to <50 mW. Images were collected at 30 Hz using bidirectional scanning with 512 × 512 pixel resolution or with custom ROIs (region of interests; frame rate range: 22-50 Hz). Somatic imaging was performed with a resolution of 0.488-0.098 μm/pixel. Dendritic spine imaging was performed with a resolution of 0.164-0.065 μm/pixel.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!