The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Storm phosphorimager

Manufactured by Cytiva
Sourced in United Kingdom

The Storm phosphorimager is a laboratory instrument used for the detection and quantification of radioactive signals in biological samples. It utilizes a phosphor imaging technique to capture and analyze data from radioactive isotopes, providing high-sensitivity and high-resolution imaging of labeled biomolecules such as proteins and nucleic acids.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

10 protocols using storm phosphorimager

1

Plasmid DNA Detection and Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total genomic DNA was digested with SacII (New England BioLabs) for strains containing pBR322-derived plasmids or NheI (New England BioLabs) for pCB104-derived plasmids. In both cases, plasmids lack restriction sites for these enzymes. Samples were then extracted with one volume of chloroform before equal cell equivalents were electrophoresed through 1.0% agarose gel in 1× TBE (Tris-borate-EDTA, pH 8.0) at 1 V/cm. DNA in the gels was transferred to a Hybond N+ nylon membrane, and the plasmid DNA was detected by probing with either 32P-labeled pBR322 or pCL01 plasmid DNA prepared by random-primer labeling (Agilent Technologies) using α32P-labeled-dCTP (3000 Ci/mmol; PerkinElmer) and visualized using a STORM PhosphorImager with its associated ImageQuant analysis software (Amersham Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Radiolabeling and Lipid Analysis in Arabidopsis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Arabidopsis thaliana Col-0 suspension cells were cultivated as described by Krinke et al. (2009 (link)). Experiments were performed on 5-day-old cultures. Suspension cells were labeled with 33Pi according to the procedure previously described by Krinke et al. (2007 (link)). Total lipids were extracted and separated by thin layer chromatography (TLC). Structural phospholipids and PA were separated in the acid solvent system composed of chloroform-acetone-acetic acid-methanol-water (10:4:2:2:1, v/v/v/v/v) (Lepage, 1967 (link)). Phosphoinositides were separated in the alkaline solvent system composed of chloroform-methanol-5% (w/v) ammonia solution (9:7:2, v/v/v), where the TLC plates were soaked in potassium oxalate solution before heat activation (Munnik et al., 1994 (link)). Radiolabeled spots were quantified by autoradiography using a Storm Phosphorimager (Amersham Biosciences). Separated phospholipids were identified by co-migration with authentic non-labeled standards visualized by primuline staining (under UV light) or by phosphate staining.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

In Vitro Protein Interaction Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This was performed as described previously18 (link). Full-length or truncated versions of TBX5 proteins were generated as MBP-fusions in bacteria following IPTG induction. These fusion proteins were partially purified from bacterial lysates on amylose resin. Their integrity was checked on PAGE by Coomassie blue staining of the gel. MBP-TBX5 fusion proteins were immobilized on amylose resin and GST-MEF2C was immobilized on glutathione sepharose beads for interaction studies. Equivalent amounts (2–5 μg) of immobilized MBP or GST fusion proteins were incubated with 35S-labelled full-length MEF2C or TBX5 (wild type or mutant) in binding buffer (50 mM Tris pH 7.4, 100 mM NaCl, 0.05% NP40, 1 mM DTT, 10% glycerol, 0.5 mM PMSF, 1μg/ml aprotinin, 1μg/ml pepstatin, 1μg/ml leupeptin, 0.05% BSA) for 2 hours at 4 °C. Beads were washed four times with binding buffer without BSA before the bound proteins were released from the beads by boiling with SDS sample buffer. Eluted proteins were subsequently resolved on SDS-PAGE followed by scanning on a Storm PhosphorImager (Amersham Bioscience), and band intensity was quantified using Image Quant software (Molecular Dynamics).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Phospholipid Separation and Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lipids were analyzed after TLC (on 200 × 200 × 0.25 mm plates, Merck, Germany). Structural phospholipids and PA were separated in an acid solvent system composed of chloroform:acetone:acetic acid:methanol:water (10:4:2:2:1 [v/v/v/v]) (Lepage, 1967 (link)). Phosphoinositides were separated in an alkaline solvent system composed of chloroform:methanol:ammonia solution (5% [w/v]; 9:7:2 [v/v/v]). TLC plates were soaked in potassium oxalate solution before heat activation (Munnik et al., 1994 (link)). Lipids were spotted by an ATS4 automatic sampler (CAMAG). Radiolabeled spots were quantified by autoradiography using a Storm Phosphorimager (Amersham Biosciences). Separated phospholipids were identified by co-migration with authentic non-labeled standards visualized by primuline staining (under UV light) and verified according to a previously published protocol (Munnik et al., 1996 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

MICA and MICB mRNA Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Confluent HaCat cells were serum-deprived overnight and treated (or not) with EGF (500ng/mL). 5μg/mL Actinomycin D (Act.D, Sigma) was then added to replicate flasks, which were subsequently harvested for mRNA extraction at defined time points. mRNA was quantified by spectrophotometry and 10μg of each sample separated on a 1.2% formalin-agarose gel and transferred overnight onto nylon membranes (Hybond N+, Amersham) by capillary blotting in 10× SSC. Blots were UV-crosslinked before hybridization. MICA, MICB and GAPDH probes were prepared by PCR and labeled with α32P dCTP using Megaprime labeling kit (Amersham) following manufacturer’s instructions. Probes were denatured at 95°C for 5min and hybridization was carried out in Expresshyb solution (Clontech) following manufacturer’s instructions. Blots were incubated with probe in roller bottles for 1h at 68°C, washed with 2× SSC, 0.5% SDS at room temperature, then with 0.1× SSC, 0.1% SDS at 50°C, and exposed to a storage phosphor screen and acquired using the Storm PhosphorImager (Amersham). Bands were quantitated using ImageJ software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

In Vitro Histone H1 Phosphorylation Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples of cell-free extracts were diluted in MPF buffer supplemented with: 0.5 mM sodium orthovanadate, 5 μg/μL of leupeptin, aprotinin, pepstatin and chymostatin, 0.4 mg/mL H1 histone (type III-S), 1 μ Ci [ γ 32P] ATP (specific activity: 3000 Ci/mmol; Amersham Biosciences, UK) and 0.8 mM ATP. After incubation at 30 °C for 30 min, phosphorylation reactions were stopped by adding Laemmli sample buffer and heated at 85 °C for 5 min. Histone H1 was separated by SDS-PAGE and incorporated radioactivity was measured by autoradiography of the gel using a STORM phosphorimager (Amersham Biosciences, Buckinghamshire, UK) followed by data analysis with ImageQuant 5.2 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunoblotting for YAP, CREB, and MAPK3/1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunoblotting was performed as previously described [46 (link)]. The primary antibodies used were directed against YAP (4912; Cell Signaling Technologies), phospho-S127 YAP (113008, Cell Signaling Technologies), phospho-S133 CREB (9198; Cell Signaling Technologies), MAPK3/1 (sc-94; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and tubulin (T8203; Sigma). All primary antibodies were used at 1:1000 dilution. Blots were scanned using a Storm phosphorimager (Amersham), and the intensity of the signals was quantified using Image J software (National Institutes of Health).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

SDS-PAGE Analysis of Biomolecular Fusions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Unless otherwise noted, SDS-PAGE of nuclease-digested
fusions and
glycopeptides was done as follows. A 4–20% gradient precast
gel (Bio-Rad) was run using a rapid protocol (300 V for 16–20
min). Precision Plus Protein Dual Xtra Standards (Bio-Rad) were used
as a molecular weight marker. To visualize the 35S-labeled
peptides by autoradiography, gels were soaked in fixing solution (22.5%
acetic acid and 5% ethanol) with shaking for 15 min, dried on filter
paper, and exposed to a phosphorimager screen to analyze using Storm
Phosphorimager (Amersham). To visualize the 35H-labeled
peptides by fluorography, gels were treated with NAMP100 Amplify Fluorographic
Reagent (GE Healthcare) according to the manufacture’s protocol,
then dried and exposed to X-ray films at −80 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Radioactive Lipid Profiling in Arabidopsis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Arabidopsis cells were aliquoted (7 ml) in individual flasks and kept for 3 h under mild rotation for equilibration. Radioisotope labeling was done by the addition of 53 MBq l–1 [33P]orthophosphate. Lipids were extracted according to Krinke et al. (2009) (link). Lipids were separated by TLC using an acidic solvent system composed of chloroform:acetone:acetic acid:methanol:water (10:4:2:2:1, v/v/v/v) (Lepage, 1967 (link)) or in a solvent system composed of chloroform:methanol:ammonia:water (90:70:1:16, v/v/v) (Munnik et al., 1994 ). Radiolabeled spots were quantified by autoradiography using a Storm phosphorimager (Amersham Biosciences, UK). Individual phospholipids were identified by co-migration with non-labeled standards visualized by primuline staining or by phosphate staining.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Phospholipid Profiling in BY-2 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BY-2 cells were aliquoted (7 mL) in wide neck flasks (capacity 50 mL) for equilibration.
Cells were then labelled by the addition of 53 MBq.L -1 [ 33 P]-orthophosphate. Total lipids were extracted according to the procedure previously described by (Krinke et al. 2009) . Lipids were separated by thin layer chromatography (TLC) and developed either in an acidic solvent system composed of chloroform:acetone:acetic acid:methanol:water (10:4:2:2:1, (v/v), Lepage 1967) or in a solvent system composed of an upper phase of ethyl acetate:isooctane:acetic acid: water (12:2:3:10 (v/v), Munnik et al. 1995) . Radiolabelled spots were quantified by autoradiography using a Storm phosphorimager (Amersham Biosciences, Buckinghamshire, UK). Separated phospholipids were identified by co-migration with authentic non-labelled standards visualized by primuline staining (under UV light) or by phosphate staining.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!