The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

5 protocols using infrared dye conjugated secondary antibodies

1

Isolation and Western Blotting of Mouse Tissue Lamin Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mouse tissues were prepared as described (Dechat et al., 1998 (link); Fong et al., 2004 (link); Jung et al., 2012 (link)). Snap-frozen mouse tissues were pulverized with a chilled metal mortar and pestle, resuspended in ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline, and homogenized with a glass tissue grinder as previously described (Jung et al., 2013 (link)). The cell pellets were resuspended in urea buffer, sonicated, and centrifuged to remove cell debris. SDS–PAGE was performed on a 4–12% gradient polyacrylamide Bis-Tris gel, transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, and incubated with the following antibodies: a goat polyclonal antibody against lamin A/C (sc-6215; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), a goat polyclonal antibody against lamin B1 (sc-6217; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), a mouse monoclonal antibody against lamin B2 (33-2100; Invitrogen), and a goat polyclonal antibody against actin (sc-1616; Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Binding of primary antibodies was assessed with infrared dye–conjugated secondary antibodies (Rockland Immunochemicals, Boyertown, PA) and quantified with an Odyssey infrared scanner (Li-Cor Biosciences, Lincoln, NE).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Antibody Database for Neuroscience Research

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibodies α-Cpx (Troy Littleton, MIT, Cambridge, MA; Huntwork and Littleton, 2007 (link)) and α-phospho-Mad (PS1; Peter ten Dijke, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Dan Vasiliauskas, Susan Morton, Tom Jessell, and Ed Laufer, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY; Persson et al., 1998 (link)) have been described previously. α-Rab11 antibodies were obtained from BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA (clone 47; Khodosh et al., 2006 (link)), α-TDP-43 antibodies (10782-2-AP) from Proteintech, Rosemont, IL, and α-tubulin antibodies (clone B-5-1-2) from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO. Rhodamine Red-X– and Alexa 647-conjugated α–horseradish peroxidase (HRP) antibodies were obtained from Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA. α-Dlg (4F3), α-Futsch (22c10), α-Wit (23C7), α-actin (JLA20), α-eve (2B8), and α-synapsin (3C11) antibodies were obtained from the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank (University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA). Secondary antibodies for imaging were conjugated to Dylight 488 or Rhodamine Red-X (Jackson ImmunoResearch). Immunoblots were imaged using infrared dye–conjugated secondary antibodies (Rockland Immunochemicals, Pottstown, PA) on a LI-COR Odyssey device.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Western Blot Analysis of Protein Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were washed twice with cold PBS, and total protein was extracted with RIPA lysis buffer (Beyotime Ins. Bio, China) with protease inhibitor PMSF (Sangon, China). The isolation of histone was performed as described previously [18 (link)]. Protein concentration was determined by the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA). Samples containing equal amount of protein were resolved by SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membranes. The membranes were probed with primary antibodies against phosphorylated or total MSK1(1:500), c-Jun (1:500), His-tag (1:500), histone H2A (1:1000) (all from Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA), Fra-1(1:500, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA) and EBV LMP1 (CS1-4) (1:1000, DAKO, Glostrup), then incubated with infrared-dye-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:10000, Rockland Immunochemicals, Gilbertsville, PA) for 1 h at room temperature. Protein bands were visualized by Odyssey Infrared Imaging System (LI-COR Biotechnology, Lincoln, NE, USA) and quantified using the Quantity One software (Bio-Rad, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

ATF1 Phosphorylation Antibody Validation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibodies against Pin1, ATF1 were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc (Santa Cruz, CA, USA); against phosphorylated ATF1 (Ser63) was from Abcam, Inc (Cambridge, MA, USA). Infrared-dye-conjugated secondary antibodies were from Rockland Immunochemicals (Gilbertsville, PA, USA). JetPEI transfection reagent was from Polyplus (llkirch, France). A polyclonal antibody against phosphorylated ATF1 (Thr184) was raised in a rabbit. Specificity of the antibody was confirmed by dot blotting and ELISA assay (Supplementary Information,Supplementary Figure S4).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Western blotting was performed as previously described.[11 (link)] Briefly, total protein from heart homogenate was extracted by sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) lysis buffer containing a protease inhibitor cocktail and phosphatase inhibitors (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). The protein content was measured using a bicinchoninic acid assay. The equal amount of protein samples were separated using 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and then were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes which were incubated with the ATF3cc antibodies (1:500, Santa Cruz) and glyceraldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) Abs (1:1000, Santa Cruz) at 4°C overnight and then with infrared dye-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:10,000; Rockland Immunochemicals) in Tris-buffered saline with Tween for 1 h at room temperature. Images were quantified using the Odyssey Infrared Imaging System.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!