The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

5424 microcentrifuge

Manufactured by Eppendorf
Sourced in Germany

The Eppendorf 5424 Microcentrifuge is a compact, high-performance centrifuge designed for a wide range of laboratory applications. It features a maximum speed of 21,100 x g and a maximum capacity of 24 microtubes. The microcentrifuge is constructed with a robust, low-noise design to provide reliable and consistent operation.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

14 protocols using 5424 microcentrifuge

1

Quantification and Solubility of mRNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine the mass of mRNA loaded, mRNA loaded in a RNApatch was first separated by scraping the needles into an eppendorf tube and then re-dissolved with RNase-free water. The quantity of mRNA present was then determined using Nanodrop 2000 Spectrophotometer. A blank microneedle patch containing no mRNA was used as control to account for background absorbance caused by PVP.
To study the solubility limits of mRNA in the PVP formulation, known quantities of mRNA were lyophilized, re-constituted in nuclease free water and mixed with PVP (1000 g/L) in a 1:4 (v:v) to achieve desired concentrations of 5, 8, 10 and 20 μg/μl. After mixing, each sample was centrifuged using the Eppendorf 5424 Microcentrifuge at max speed for 1 minute. The supernatants were completely removed and transferred into new tubes for analysis. Gel pellets, if any, were washed by resuspending them with 100 μl nuclease free water, followed by centrifugation again at max speed for 1 minute. Supernatant were discarded and washed pellets, if any, were either directly used for analysis or further treated with 20 mM EDTA. Gel electrophoresis was employed to evaluate presence of mRNA in the supernatant, washed pellets, and EDTA treated washed pellets. The absorbance spectrum was characterized using Nanodrop 2000C Spectrophotometer using the UV-Vis mode.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying Extracellular DNA in Biofilms

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The amount of extracellular DNA (eDNA) was measured after its precipitation from cell-free supernatants. For this, 500 µL of the aforementioned biofilm culture and 550 µL of the bottom culture containing solid–liquid interface biofilms of the same microcosm, in which the PA-11/PHMG-NS films had been incubated for 72 h, were vortexed for 1 min and spun down at 13,000× g for 15 min (Eppendorf 5424 Microcentrifuge). Five hundred microlitres of each supernatant were removed and transferred into new 1.5 mL plastic tubes. One millilitre of chilled 96% ethanol and 50 µL of a 3 M sodium acetate solution (pH 5.2) were added to the supernatants, which were then incubated overnight at –20 °C. Then, the samples were spun down at 13,000× g for 15 min and the supernatants were removed. One millilitre of 70% ethanol was added into each of the tubes, which were then spun down again at 13,000× g for 15 min to wash the pellet. The supernatants were removed and the sediments were dried to full ethanol evaporation. Two hundred microlitres of Tris-EDTA (TE) buffer were added to dissolve each sample. eDNA concentration was measured using a NanoDrop 2000 spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Artonin E Dose-Dependent Protein Extraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total protein was extracted from 1 × 106 cells/T25 of MDA-MB-231 cells after 24 hours of treatment with 3, 10 and 30 μM of Artonin E. Briefly, treated and untreated samples were lysed with 100 μL RIPA lysis buffer containing 1 μL of E-64 protease inhibitor cocktail. The pellet was resuspended thoroughly and incubated at 4°C for 30 minutes with agitation before centrifuging it at 10,000 rpm (Eppendorf 5424 Microcentrifuge, USA) for 10 minutes. The supernatant was thereafter transferred into fresh Eppendorf tubes and the concentration of the extracted proteins was quantified using Pierce BCA protein assay kit by microplate assay (universal microplate reader, Biotech, Inc, USA). This was done in three replicates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

RNA Extraction from DPSC Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To evaluate biomarker expression among the DPSC isolates, RNA was extracted using the phenol:chloroform method, as previously described [23 ,29 (link),30 (link)]. In brief, 500 µL of TRIzol reagent from Fisher Scientific (Fair Lawn, NJ, USA) was applied to an equal volume of cell suspension (500 µL) and mixed prior to the addition of 200 µL of molecular grade chloroform from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Following incubation on ice, samples were centrifuged at 12,000 × relative centrifugal force (RCF) at 4 °C in a 5424 Microcentrifuge from Eppendorf (Hamburg, Germany). The upper aqueous RNA-containing phase was removed and combined with an equal volume of molecular grade isopropanol from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) and incubated on ice for ten minutes to precipitate the nucleic acids. Each sample was centrifuged again for 10 min and the supernatant was removed prior to washing with 70% ethanol from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Following a final centrifugation for five minutes, the supernatant was removed and the RNA-containing pellet was resuspended in 100 µL of nuclease-free water from Fisher Scientific (Fair Lawn, NJ, USA). Analysis of RNA isolation was completed using a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer from Fisher Scientific (Fair Lawn, NJ, USA) to evaluate the concentration and purity of the RNA. Each sample was subsequently stored at −20 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Optimized Carotenoid Production in R. toruloides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ATMT with strain EHA 105 was performed using R. toruloides IFO0880, previously described [53 (link)]. Twenty random transformants of each construct were randomly selected and cultivated in 0.5 mL Difco YPD (yeast extract 10 g/L, peptone 20 g/L, and glucose 20 g/L) (VWR, 90,003–284, Radnor, PA) in a 96-well plate (Corning, 3960, Corning, NY) with gas-permeable sealing film (m2p-labs, F-GP, Baesweiler, Germany) for 24 h, shaking on a Multitron (INFORS HT, I10003, Bottmingen, Switzerland) at 31 °C, 1,000 rpm and 70% humidity. The following day, 50 μl of the saturated culture was transferred into 950 μl YPD10 (YPD containing 100 g/L of glucose) in a 48-well flower plate (m2p-labs, M2P-48-B). 20% dodecane overlay with an internal standard (200 mg/L pentadecane) was added to the production cultures (Sigma-Aldrich, 76,510, St. Louis, MO). After 7 days of cultivation, at 30 °C, 1,000 rpm, with 70% humidity in the Multitron shaker, the production cultures were centrifuged (21,130 × g, 5 min) to separate the overlay from the cultivation media. Centrifugation was in an Eppendorf 5424 Microcentrifuge (Eppendorf AG, 022620428, Hamburg, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Exfoliation of MoS2 with Nucleotides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MoS2 powder and the nucleotides AMP, GMP, and FMN were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich and used as received. MoS2 in powder form was added to an aqueous solution of a given nucleotide (AMP, GMP or FMN; 1 mg mL -1 ) at a MoS2/nucleotide mass ratio of 30:1, and then the mixture was sonicated in an ultrasound bath cleaner for 5 h (J.P. Selecta
Ultrasons system; frequency: 40 kHz; power: ~20 W L -1 ). The resulting sonicated suspension was centrifuged at 200g for 20 min (Eppendorf 5424 microcentrifuge) to sediment poorly exfoliated or non-exfoliated particles and the top ~75% of the in the text as MoS2-AMP, MoS2-GMP and MoS2-FMN, respectively. The concentration of the MoS2 dispersions was estimated from the extinction value at the local minimum of ≈345 nm using a calculated extinction coefficient of e≈6900 L g -1 m -1 [20] .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Total RNA Extraction Using Aurum Kit

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The extraction was done using the Aurum Total RNA Mini kit (Bio-Rad). After treatments, the cells were transferred to a 2 mL microcentrifuge tube and centrifuged at 20,000× g for 2 minutes. The supernatant was discarded and 350 µL lysis solution added to each tube followed by 350 µL 70% ethanol, and mixed thoroughly to obtain the homogenized lysate. The RNA binding column was inserted into a 2 mL wash tube and 700 µL homogenized lysate pipetted into the RNA binding column that was then centrifuged at 20,000× g for 30 seconds. Then, 700 µL low stringency wash solution was added to the RNA binding column and the column centrifuged at 20,000× g for 30 seconds. The ribonuclease-free deoxyribonuclease 1 was then added with mixing followed by 700 µL high stringency wash solution. After centrifugation at 20,000× g for 30 seconds, the wash solution was discarded and replaced with 700 µL of fresh low stringency wash solution. The column was recentrifuged at 20,000× g for 1 minute before discarding the wash solution. Then, the RNA was left for 1 minute before centrifuging at 20,000× g for 2 minutes to obtain the RNA. Nanodrop Bio Spectrometer was employed to quantify the RNA. All centrifugations were performed in the Eppendorf 5424 microcentrifuge (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Evaluating PHMG-Cl Efficacy on Biofilms

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Aliquots of an aqueous PHMG-Cl solution were added to the wells of a 96-well plate with 24 h PA and SA biofilm cultures at final concentrations of 5%, 1%, 0.5%, 0.1%, 0.05%, 0.01%, 0.005%, and 0.001%, with eight replicates per treatment. These were incubated for 1 h at room temperature. A negative control sample was produced using 50% ethanol and a positive (live) control produced by adding sterile distilled water. MTT solution (Sigma-Aldrich, UK) was then added to each well to a final concentration of 0.05% and the mixture incubated at 37 °C for 3 h. Biofilms were removed from each well and placed in 1.5 mL plastic tubes, which were then centrifuged at 13,000× g for 15 min in an Eppendorf 5424 microcentrifuge (Eppendorf, Germany). The supernatant was discarded, and the pellet dissolved in 500 µL of DMSO. Metabolic activity was evaluated using absorbance measurements at 570 nm in a BioTek ELx800 microplate spectrophotometer (BioTek Instruments, Inc., Winooski, VT, USA). Net biofilm metabolic activity was calculated by subtracting the negative control values.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Follistatin Induction by Herbal Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dried powder samples of aqueous herbal extracts (R. Astragali, S. Persicae, Pheretima, F. Carthami, R. Sinensis, R. Rubra, and R. Chuanxiong) were purchased from Nong’s Pharmaceutical Ltd. (Hong Kong). For herbal extract preparation, the dried powder of each herbal extract (100 mg) was dissolved in 1 mL of Milli Q water produced by Milli Q Synthesis A10 Water Purificaiton System (EMD Millipore, Germany) at 80°C for 30 min, with vortexing every 10 min. After cooling to room temperature, the insoluble materials were removed by centrifugation at 12,000 rpm on an Eppendorf 5424 microcentrifuge (Eppendorf AG, Germany) for 10 min. The supernatant was recovered and sterilized by passage through a syringe filter with a 0.22-μm (Pall, New York, USA) membrane. For assays of follistatin induction, HepG2 cells were treated for 24 h with the supernatants of the individual herbal extracts at the following concentrations: R. Astragali, 5.18 mg/mL; S. Persicae, 0.13 mg/mL; Pheretima, 0.13 mg/mL; F. Carthami, 0.13 mg/mL; R. Sinensis, 0.26 mg/mL; R. Rubra, 0.19 mg/mL; R. Chuanxiong, 0.13 mg/mL. The expression of follistatin was detected by RT-PCR and analyzed by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Preparation of Dual Herbal Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dried powder samples of aqueous herbal extracts (Hedyotis diffusa and Scutellaria barbata) were purchased from Xian Changyue Ltd. (Xian, China). The herbal extract preparation was prepared by the following steps: first, the dried powder composition comprising Hedyotis diffusa and Scutellaria barbata (50 mg each) was dissolved and mixed into 5 mL of Milli Q water produced by Milli Q Synthesis A10 Water Purification System (EMD Millipore, Germany) at 70°C for 30 min under vortexing every 5 min; secondly, after cooling to room temperature, the insoluble materials were removed by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm by an Eppendorf 5424 microcentrifuge (Eppendorf AG, Germany) for 10 min; thirdly, the supernatant was recovered and sterilized by passage through a syringe filter with a 0.22 μm (Pall, New York, USA) membrane; finally, the supernatants of herbal extracts were stored at −20°C for further use [17 , 18 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!