The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Power lab 8 sp data

Manufactured by ADInstruments
Sourced in Australia

The PowerLab 8/SP™ is a high-performance data acquisition system designed for laboratory research and education. It features eight analog input channels, allowing the simultaneous recording of multiple signals. The PowerLab 8/SP™ enables accurate data collection and analysis for a variety of applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

2 protocols using power lab 8 sp data

1

Cardiac Function Evaluation in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A catheter was inserted into the left ventricle of the mice through the left atrium as described previously (16 (link)). The left ventricular end-diastolic pressure was adjusted to 5–7 mm Hg during the initial equilibrium phase. The distal end of the catheter was connected to a Power Lab 8/SP data acquisition system (ADInstruments, Dunedin, New Zealand) via a pressure transducer for the continuous recording of cardiac function. Cardiac function was evaluated based on left ventricular developed pressure. Fractional shortening (FS) was calculated as follows: FS = [left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVEDD)-left ventricular end systolic diameter (LVESD)]/LVEDD ×100. The ejection fraction (EF) was calculated from left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) and end-systolic volume (LVESD) using the equation (LVEDV-LVESV)/LVEDV ×100.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Pharmacodynamic and Pharmacokinetic Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cystometric and manometry data were recorded using LabChart software (versions 7 and 8) through a PowerLab/8SP data acquisition system (ADInstruments, Australia). Data were analyzed using Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA) and Prism 6 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA). Data were subjected to ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test or Sidak’s multiple comparison test to compare the effect of test compounds with vehicle, or Student’s t-test, as appropriate; P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Bioanalytical data were collected using Analyst (MDS Sciex, Framingham, MA, USA). Regression analysis was generated using Watson Laboratory Information Management System (ThermoFisher Scientific, Logan, UT, USA) and Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA). Noncompartmental PK analysis was performed using Phoenix WinNonlin 6.3 (Certara, St. Louis, MO, USA) or PK Solver (Zhang et al, 2010 ). AUC was calculated between the first and last sample time points. All values are expressed as the mean + standard deviation (S.D.), except the cardiovascular data in Fig. 6 which is presented as mean + standard error (S.E.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!