The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

28 protocols using high throughput sampler

1

Ex vivo Immunophenotyping of Influenza Vaccine Response

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For ex vivo immunophenotyping, multicolor staining combinations were designed (table 1) to include T and B cell subpopulations that were found to be responsive to influenza vaccination in the previous study.20 (link) The 2 × 106 blood cells (after lysing red blood cells) or PBMCs were stained according to a previously published protocol21 (link) that includes blockade of Fc receptors by 2% IV immunoglobulin (Ig). For intracellular staining of ROR-γt, a minimum of 106 blood cells were stained for surface markers. Then, cells were fixed by Cytofix/Cytoperm buffer and washed by Perm/Wash buffer (all BD Biosciences) before staining with intracellular Ab.
Cells were immediately acquired on a BD LSR II equipped with a High Throughput Sampler and analyzed with FACSDiva 6.1 software (all BD Biosciences). Gating was based on isotype controls (see figure e-1 for gating strategy).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Yeast Cell Fluorescence Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For all experiments, 5,000–10,000 events were acquired using a BD LSRFortessa equipped with a High Throughput Sampler (BD Biosciences). Events were gated by forward and side scatter, and geometric means of the fluorescence distributions were calculated in FlowJo. The autofluorescence value of S. cerevisiae YPH500 cells harboring no genomic integrations was subtracted from these values. “Fold activation” values were calculated as the ratio of fluorescence values from induced cells to those from uninduced cells. All values obtained were the means of three isogenic strains. BFP and mCherry expression, driven by the CHO1 and BIO2 promoters, respectively, remained largely invariant between induced and uninduced cultures (Figure S6C); thus GFP values are not expected to vary significantly with any growth rate differences in strains.
Gene ontology queries were submitted to the SGD database between July 10, 2013 and August 17, 2013 (Cherry et al., 2012 (link)). Cluster and background frequencies are in the Supplementary Tables.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

GFP and mCherry Degradation Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data for GFP and mCherry degradation dynamics and propidium iodide staining were collected using an LSRFortessa cell analyzer equipped with a High Throughput Sampler (BD Biosciences), and data for the synthetic toggle switch were collected using a FACSAriaII flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). For each GFP and mCherry measurement, cells were fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde (PFA), held at 4° for up to 5 days, and then diluted 1:10 in PBS for analysis. At least 5,000 cells were collected for each measurement and FloJo (Treestar) was used for data analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

GFP and mCherry Degradation Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data for GFP and mCherry degradation dynamics and propidium iodide staining were collected using an LSRFortessa cell analyzer equipped with a High Throughput Sampler (BD Biosciences), and data for the synthetic toggle switch were collected using a FACSAriaII flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). For each GFP and mCherry measurement, cells were fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde (PFA), held at 4° for up to 5 days, and then diluted 1:10 in PBS for analysis. At least 5,000 cells were collected for each measurement and FloJo (Treestar) was used for data analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

IGFBP2 uptake in MM231 cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MM231 cells were trypsinized, run through a single-cell filter, and then incubated with concentrated TIF medium (10 mg/ml) from either IGFBP2 or IGFBP2-Clover overexpressing TIFs for 30 min at 37°C. Next, cells were fixed with 2% PFA for 10 min at 37°C and washed two times with PBS. Between 50,000 and 100,000 cells were resuspended in 200 μl of PBS and loaded into a 96-well plate. Cytometry was then performed on an LSRFortessa cell analyzer using the High Throughput Sampler (BD Biosciences). The 488-nm laser power was adjusted using a positive control population of MM231 stably expressing IGFBP2-Clover before running the other conditions. Up to 10,000 single cells were collected per condition. Gating and statistical analysis of the cell population geometric means and robust SD were performed in FlowJo (BD Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Genotoxicity Assessment of TEMPO Derivatives

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The genotoxic MoA of TEMPO and its 3 derivatives was investigated by a method for evaluating multiple endpoints that are associated with DNA damage response pathways (MultiFlow DNA Damage Kit—p53, γ-H2AX, Phospho-Histone H3) according to the manufacturer’s manual (Litron Laboratories, Rochester, New York). Briefly, 4 × 104 TK6 cells were seeded into each well of a 96-well plate and exposed to 14 concentrations of each chemical. After 4- and 24-h of incubation, 25 μl of cells were removed from each well and added to a 96-well U-bottomed plate preloaded with 50 μl of working MultiFlow Kit Labeling solution. Following 30 min incubation at room temperature, flow cytometric analysis was performed using a FACSCanto II flow cytometer equipped with a High Throughput Sampler (BD Biosciences, San Jose, California). Ten thousand total events were acquired or the entire 30 μl volume was exhausted, whichever came first. A total of 5 endpoints were obtained. More specifically, chemical-induced cytotoxicity was calculated using nuclei to counting bead ratios; phosphorylated γ-H2AX and p53 responses were evaluated based on median fluorescence intensity; and the percentages of phosphorylated histone H3 (p-H3) and polyploidy were quantified as the proportion of p-H3-positive and 8n-positive events relative to the total events with 2n and greater DNA content.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantifying CyaA-HPV16 E7 Binding Inhibition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The experiments used CHO-CR3 cells transduced to express human CD11b (CHO-CR3 CD11b+ cells). CHO-CR3 CD11b+ cells were incubated for 30 min on ice in binding buffer with 40 nM biotinylated CyaA-HPV16 E7 and 0 to 512 nM CyaA, 0 to 512 nM test substance, or 512 nM heat-inactivated GTL001. After washing, cells were incubated for 30 min on ice with 0.5 mg/mL PE-labeled streptavidin. Cells were re-suspended in 10 nM TO-PRO-3. Bound biotin-CyaA-HPV16 E7 was detected by flow cytometry using a FACSCanto A equipped with a high-throughput sampler (BD Biosciences). Analyses were performed after gating on living cells as based on exclusion of TO-PRO-3 positive cells. The dose-response curves were fitted using Prism (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA) to estimate the concentration resulting in 50% inhibition (IC50).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

High-Throughput Micronucleus Assay for Toxicity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were seeded in 96-well plates and washed twice with sterile PBS after the 24-h treatment. Ethidium monoazide and SYTOX® Green were used to label apoptotic/necrotic cells and chromatin, respectively, following the protocol described in the In Vitro MicroFlowTM Kit (Litron Laboratories, Rochester, NY). After cell lysis, the high-throughput (HT) micronucleus analysis was performed using a FACSCanto II flow cytometer equipped with a High Throughput Sampler (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). The stopping gate was set to record 10,000 intact nuclei and threshold parameters were set as recommended by the manufacturer. The percentage of micronuclei (%MN) was calculated as the ratio of micronucleus events to the total number of nucleated events. The data were expressed as the fold-change of %MN in treated groups over vehicle controls. Cell cycle data were collected by retrieving histograms of SYTOX® Green nucleic acid stain fluorescence. The analysis was conducted using FlowJo® (v10.1) with Watson pragmatic model.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Hormone-Mediated Cell Growth Monitoring

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were grown from saturation for 5 h in exponential phase SDC at 30 °C. 200 μL of culture (OD600 0.05) were transferred to a shallow 96-well plate (Corning). Estradiol and progesterone were added at the concentrations indicated in Figure 4 and cells were left shaking at 1200 rpm and 30 °C (Thermo-shaker DTS-4, ELMI). After 5 h, cultures were diluted 1:2 with 1× TE buffer and taken to a cytometer (LSR-II, BD Biosciences) equipped with a high throughput sampler (BD Biosciences). Data was collected in FACS DIVA and analyzed in Matlab. Cell density was estimated from flow cytometry event rate.
Light microscopy was conducted on samples uninduced and fully induced with both hormones. 100 μL of cultures treated for 5 h were sonicated and added to glass-bottom plate precoated with conavalin-A. Cells were immediately imaged in a Nilon Eclipse-Ti microscope with a 40× objective.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Hematopoietic Stem Cell Immunophenotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At the indicated experimental endpoint, cultured cells (cultured from bulk or single clones) were stained with EPCR PE (Clone RMEPCR1560, SCT), Sca‐1 BV605 (Clone D7, Biolegend), CD11b APC (Clone M1/70, Biolegend), Gr‐1 PE/Cy7 (Clone RB6‐8C5, Biolegend), c‐Kit APC/Cy7 (Clone 2B8, Biolegend), CD45 BV421 (Biolegend), and 7AAD (Life Technologies). To enumerate cells, a defined number of fluorescent beads (Trucount Control Beads, BD) were added to each well and each sample was back calculated to the proportion of the total that were run through the cytometer. Flow cytometry was performed on an LSRFortessa (BD) with a High Throughput Sampler (BD; for single clone analysis).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!