The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

4 protocols using anti mouse cd19 6d5

1

Flow Cytometry-based Immune Cell Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For flow cytometric analysis, single-cell suspensions were stained as described (25 (link)). Intracellular staining was conducted using a Fixation/Permeabilization kit (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) following incubation of cells with Leukocyte Activation Cocktail (BD, San Diego, CA, USA) with Brefeldin A or Monensin (eBioscience). Fragment crystallizable (Fc) receptors were blocked using purified CD16/32 monoclonal antibody (mAb) (BD). Viable lymphocytes were assessed using Live/Dead Fixable Dead Cell Stain Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Matching isotype mAbs were used to control for background staining.
Anti-mouse CD5 (53-7.3), B220 (RA3-6B2), CD3 (17A2) and CD39 (24DMS1) were purchased from eBioscience. Anti-mouse CD19 (6D5) was from Biolegend (San Diego, CA, USA). Anti-mouse CD4 (RM4-5), CD25 (PC61) and Foxp3 (MF23) were purchased from BD.
Human cells were stained with CD20 APC-Cy7 (L27) and CD5 PE-Cy7 (L17F12), (BD, San Diego, CA, USA). TLR9 PE (26C593.2) was purchased from Enzo Life Sciences (Farmingdale, NY, USA). CD19 PE (HIB19) was purchased from eBioscience. A BD LSRII flow cytometer was used for assessment of cell suspensions (San Jose, CA, USA). Analysis was conducted using FlowJo software (Treestar, Ashland, OR, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Flow Cytometry-based Immune Cell Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For flow cytometric analysis, single-cell suspensions were stained as described (25 (link)). Intracellular staining was conducted using a Fixation/Permeabilization kit (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) following incubation of cells with Leukocyte Activation Cocktail (BD, San Diego, CA, USA) with Brefeldin A or Monensin (eBioscience). Fragment crystallizable (Fc) receptors were blocked using purified CD16/32 monoclonal antibody (mAb) (BD). Viable lymphocytes were assessed using Live/Dead Fixable Dead Cell Stain Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Matching isotype mAbs were used to control for background staining.
Anti-mouse CD5 (53-7.3), B220 (RA3-6B2), CD3 (17A2) and CD39 (24DMS1) were purchased from eBioscience. Anti-mouse CD19 (6D5) was from Biolegend (San Diego, CA, USA). Anti-mouse CD4 (RM4-5), CD25 (PC61) and Foxp3 (MF23) were purchased from BD.
Human cells were stained with CD20 APC-Cy7 (L27) and CD5 PE-Cy7 (L17F12), (BD, San Diego, CA, USA). TLR9 PE (26C593.2) was purchased from Enzo Life Sciences (Farmingdale, NY, USA). CD19 PE (HIB19) was purchased from eBioscience. A BD LSRII flow cytometer was used for assessment of cell suspensions (San Jose, CA, USA). Analysis was conducted using FlowJo software (Treestar, Ashland, OR, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Isolation and Characterization of Liver Cell Populations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were isolated 24 or 72 h after injection with LNPs, unless otherwise noted. Mice were perfused in the liver portal vein with 5 mL of Krebs Ringer buffer (pH 7.3). Tissues were finely minced and then placed in Collagenase XI (Sigma Aldrich) at 37 °C at 500 rpm for 30 min. The cell suspension was filtered through 70 μm mesh and washed with 1× PBS. Cells were stained to identify specific cell populations and sorted using the BD FacsFusion cell sorter at the Georgia Institute of Technology Cellular Analysis Core. The antibody clones used were: Live/dead far-red fluorescent dye (Invitrogen, dilution 1:250), anti-mouse CD31 (390, BioLegend, dilution 1:250), anti-mouse CD45.2 (104, BioLegend, dilution 1:250), anti-mouse CD68 (FA11, BioLegend, dilution 1:250), anti-mouse CD11b (M1/70, BioLegend, dilution 1:250), anti-mouse CD11c (N418, BioLegend, dilution 1:250), anti-mouse CD3 (17A2, Biolegend, dilution 1:250), anti-mouse CD19 (6D5, BioLegend, dilution 1:250). Representative flow gates are in Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2. PBS-injected mice were used to gate on tdTomato positive populations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Cell surface marker analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For analysis of surface markers, prepared single cell suspension (100 μL, 5 × 106 cells/ml) was stained with anti-mouse CD45 (30-F11, Biolegend), anti-mouse CD19 (6D5, Biolegend), anti-mouse CD45.1 (A20, Tonbo), anti-mouse CD45.2 (104, Invitrogen), anti-mouse IgA (mA-6E1, Invitrogen). Stained cells were analyzed on FACSCelesta (BD Biosciences) and the obtained data were analyzed with FlowJo_V10 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!