The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

12 protocols using kinetex biphenyl

1

Coccidiostat Quantification by UHPLC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The detection and quantification of coccidiostats was performed with an UHPLC coupled with a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer, namely, a Nexera X2 Shimadzu UHPLC connected to a QTRAP 5500+ (Sciex, Foster City, CA, USA).
Regarding the chromatography separation conditions, the column used was a Phenomenex Kinetex biphenyl (1.7 µm, 100 A, 2.1 × 50 mm), maintained at 40 °C. The injection volume was 10 μL, and the autosampler was kept at room temperature. The flow rate was 500 μL min−1, and the mobile phase consisted of 0.1% formic acid in water (A) and ACN (B). The gradient program was as follows: 0–6 min from 100% A to 100% B and kept until 9 min, then back to 100% A from 9 to 10 min, for a total run time of 11 min.
In terms of mass spectrometry, the detector was equipped with an electrospray ionization source, simultaneously working in negative and positive mode (ESI+ and ESI−) at 500 °C. The acquisition was performed in multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) with the software Analyst TF (SCIEX, Foster, CA, USA) and the data analysis with MultiQuant (SCIEX, Foster, CA, USA). The conditions optimized for each compound and the correspondent IS are presented in Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Ceftobiprole Analytical Validation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ceftobiprole was obtained from Basilea Pharmaceutica International Ltd. (Basel, Switzerland), manufactured on March 2017 and stored in a freezer at −20 °C). Deionised water was obtained from a Labconco System by Millipore (Bedford, MA, USA). Acetonitrile (ACN, gradient grade for HPLC, ≥99.9%), ACN for LC-MS (≥99.9%), methanol (MeOH, gradient grade for HPLC, ≥99.9%) and DMSO (for HPLC, 99.7%) were obtained from Honeywell (Charlotte, NC, USA). Sodium hydroxide (≥98.8%), ammonium hydrogencarbonate (≥99.0%) and ammonium formate (≥99.0%) were delivered by Chempur (Piekary Śląskie, Poland); HCl (pure p.a., 35–38%) and H2O2 (pure p.a., 30%) were bought from POCH (Gliwice, Poland); acetic acid (for LC-MS, 99.8%) and ammonium acetate (reag. Ph. Eur., ≥98.0%) were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany); acetic acid (pharma grade, 99.9%) was obtained from AppliChem (Darmstadt, Germany); and ammonium acetate (for LC-MS, ≥99.0%) and formic acid (reag. Ph. Eur., ≥98%) were manufactured by Sigma-Aldrich (Darmstadt, Germany).
The following chromatographic columns were used: Kinetex C18 (150 × 3 mm, 2.6 μm), Kinetex PS C18 (150 × 2.1 mm, 2.6 μm) and Kinetex Biphenyl (150 × 2.1 mm; 1.7 μm) from Phenomenex (Torrance, CA, USA), as well as Accucore AQ C18 (150 × 4.6 mm, 2.6 μm) from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

UPLC-MS/MS Biphenyl Column Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The UPLC system was an Agilent 1290 (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and composed of a binary pump, column oven and cooled auto sampler. The mass spectrometer was an Agilent 6495 with an electrospray ionization source.
The analytical column was a Kinetex® Biphenyl (1.7 μm, 100 × 2.1 mm) from Phenomenex (Torrance, CA, USA). The chromatographic separation was performed at 50°C with a flow rate of 0.4 mL/minute utilizing a linear gradient of water (A) and acetonitrile (B), both with 0.1% formic acid: 30 to 100% B from 0.00 to 3.00 minutes; isocratic at 100% B for 1 minute, then returning to initial conditions from 4.00 to 4.1 minutes with a total run time of 5 minutes. The samples were kept at 10°C until injection (10 μL).
Data acquisition and processing was performed using MassHunter software v B.08.01 (Agilent Technologies). The detection was by MRM; the parameters are described in Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

HPLC Fractionation of Plant Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fractioning was performed with an HPLC Shimadzu LC-20AT coupled with a DAD SPD-20A detector. The semi-preparative column was in a Kinetex biphenyl stationary phase (300 mm * 4.6 mm, 5µ particle of 100 A, Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA). Analysis was performed in gradient mode at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The gradient started from 0% to 100% methanol during 55 min. The column was washed for 25 min with 100% water. All fractioning were realized four times with 100 µL of 10 mg/mL extracts.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative Mass Spectrometry Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantification measurements were performed on Agilent 6495B Triple-Quad LC/MS coupled to 1260 Infinity II LC system (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA). The resulting data were quantified and processed using MassHunter Workstation Software ver. B.09.00 (Agilent Technologies). The mass spectrometer was operated in “Dynamic MRM” mode, with following source parameters - gas temp 160 oC, gas flow 14 L/min, sheat gas temp 390 oC and shear gas flow 12 L/min. The capillary voltage was set to 2800 V for positive mode and 3000 V for negative mode, with nozzle voltage at constant 0 V.
The chromatographic columns, Kinetex Biphenyl (100 × 2.1 mm, 1.7 μm) and Kinetex Polar (150 × 2.1 mm, 2.6 μm), were from Phenomenex Ltd. (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA). Kinetex Polar, with inlet filter, was used for all presented work. Gradient employed for all analyses takes 23 min at flow of 0.53 mL/min and consists of mobile phase A (dH2O with 0.03% FA (v/v)) and B (acetonitrile). Its gradient time-frame was: 0 min − 99% A, 8 min – 91.5% A, 9 min – 90% A, 15 min – 88% A, 20 min – 2% A, 21 min – 99% A, 23 min – 99% A. The column compartment was heated to 53 oC.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

UPLC-MS/MS Identification of Algal Species

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Species composition was identified by LC-MS/MS according to our recent report26 (link). Briefly, UPLC separation was performed on a Kinetex Biphenyl (2.6 µm, 150 × 2.1mm) column (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) by using a binary mobile phase of water and methanol (MeOH). The elution program (flow rate 0.3 mL/min) was from 40% to 80% MeOH in 2 min, then 100% MeOH in 13 min and 100% MeOH for other 7 min. Full scan mass spectra (ESI in negative ion mode) were acquired in the m/z range 150–2000 with a resolution of 70000. MS/MS experiments on monoisotopically isolated precursor ions were performed with a normalized collision energy between 20 and 40.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Isolation and Purification of Metabolites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the isolation, the same HPLC system was used as described above. Column: Kinetex® Biphenyl, 100 Å, 250–4.6 mm (5 µm, same material pre-column; Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA); Injection volume 10 µL; oven temp.: 25 °C; auto sampler temp.: 10 °C; detection wavelength: 340 nm; flow: 1.2 mL/min; A = H2O + 0.1% TFA, B = acetonitrile + 0.1% TFA; gradient: 0–2 min 10% B, 2–15 min 10% B → 70% B, 15–16 min 70% B → 10% B, 16–20 min 10% B. The peaks of the metabolites (retention times: 6.85 min for IO-G1, 7.86 min for IO-G3 and 8.4 min for IO) were collected separately and subsequently purified by another solid phase extraction. Additionally, 0.15 mg of IO-G1 and 0.4 mg of IO-G3 could be observed as purified metabolites.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantification of Caffeine and Chlorogenic Acid in Coffee

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following standards and chemicals were used: chlorogenic acid (Dr Ehrenstorfer GmbH, Augsburg, Germany), caffeine (Sigma-Aldrich, Prague, Czech Republic), methanol for HPLC (Sigma-Aldrich, Prague, Czech Republic), and acetic acid 100% for HPLC (Sigma-Aldrich, Prague, Czech Republic).
The sample of ground coffee (7 g) was added into a beaker (250 mL), and the caffeine and CQA were coextracted for 5 min with 100 mL of hot (90 °C) demineralised water. Then the sample was filtered through the paper filter. Coffee extracts were analysed by the HPLC method described in Yoe-Ray et al. [21 (link)] with the following modifications. caffeine and CQA were separated on the column Kinetex, Biphenyl, 150 × 4.6 mm, particle size 5 µm (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) with the guard column (SecurityGuard ULTRA Cartridge, UHPLC Biphenyl, for 4.6 mm ID columns, Phenomenex) using a liquid chromatograph Agilent 1260 Infinity II (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) with quaternary pump and diode array detector. The column was thermostated at 35 °C. Methanol/acetic acid 1% (20:80 v/v) was used as a mobile phase. The flow rate of the mobile phase was 1 mL min−1. The separated CQA and caffeine, respectively, were detected at 273 nm. The calibration curve was used for the quantitative determination; the calibration curve points ranged from 10 to 100 µg mL−1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

HPLC Separation and Quantification Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The HPLC system consists of: Elite LaChrom with an L2200 autosampler, L2130 pump, L2350 column oven, L2444 DAD, and EZChrom Elite 3.1.7 software (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan); column: Kinetex® Biphenyl, 100 Å, 250 × 4.6 mm 5 µm (same material pre-column; Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA); injection volume 20 µL; oven temp. 25 °C; auto sampler temp.: 10 °C; detection wavelength: 340 nm; flow: 1.2 mL/min; A = H2O + 0.1% TFA, B = acetonitrile + 0.1% TFA; gradient: 0–2 min 10% B, 2–15 min 10% B → 70% B, 15–16 min 70% B → 10% B, 16–20 min 10% B. All samples were filtered (Phenex RC Membrane 0.2 um, Phenomenex, USA) before injection.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

HPLC Analysis of Biphenyl Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An HPLC system (Shimadzu Prominence UFLC, Kyoto, Japan) interfaced with a photodiode array detector was employed in this study, as previously reported [3 ]. Chromatography was carried out on a reversed-phase column (4.6 mm × 150 mm, 5 μm, Kinetex Biphenyl, Phenomenex, Sydney, Australia). The mobile phase system consisted of 50 mM ammonium acetate (pH 5.0, solvent A) and 50% (v/v) methanol in Milli Q water (solvent B). The initial condition was set at 90% solvent A and 10% solvent B. The composition of solvent B was then raised to 100% in 4 min and remained at this condition for 10 min before going back to the initial condition (10% B) at 15 min. Each run was 25 min in duration, the flow rate and the injection volume were set at 0.8 mL/min and 50 μL, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!