The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Whatman no 2 filter paper

Manufactured by GE Healthcare
Sourced in United States

Whatman No. 2 filter paper is a general-purpose filter paper designed for laboratory filtration applications. It is made from high-quality cellulose fibers and is suitable for a range of filtering tasks, including the separation of solid particles from liquids. The paper has a medium-slow flow rate and a medium particle retention capacity.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

12 protocols using whatman no 2 filter paper

1

Free Amino Acid Quantification in LM Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Free amino acid contents in the samples were analyzed as previously described by Henderson et al. (2000) . Ten grams of LM sample were dissolved in 200 mL of 80% ethanol and stored at room temperature for 12 hours. The solution was filtered (Whatman filter paper No. 2, GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences Corp., Piscataway, NJ, USA). The filtrate was concentrated on an evaporator (Eyela Rotary evaporator N-1100, Tokyo Rikakikai, Co., Tokyo, Japan) at 45°C and dissolved in 40 mL of distilled water. Infranatant separated by funnel after adding ethyl ether (20 mL; Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) was evaporated. The residue was dissolved in 20 mL of 0.2 M citrate buffer and filtered through 0.45 μm syringe filter (Toyo Roshi Kaisha, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and the free amino acids were analyzed with HPLC (L-8900, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). Cation exchange resin (4.6 mm×60 mm) was used as a column, Lithium Citrate Buffer solution (0.35 mL/min) was used as a mobile phase A, and Ninhydrin reagents (0.3 mL/min) solution was used as a mobile phase B. Free amino acid mixture standard solution (Wako Pure Chemical Co., Osaka, Japan) was used as derivatives.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Soil Bacteria Cultivation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the cultivation of soil bacteria, R2A, TSA, LB, NB, 50% diluted R2A, R2A-SE (1:1, v/v), and SCA-SE (1:1, v/v) culture media were used. In addition, J26-SE (1:1, v/v) medium was formulated in the laboratory by adding trace elements (SL-10), selenite tungstate, and soil extract (SE) (Table S1). SE has been widely used to isolate soil bacteria15 (link). To prepare SE, 1 kg of soil was suspended in 2 L of distilled water (d/w) and shaken overnight on a shaker at room temperature. The soil suspension was allowed to settle, and the fluid was centrifuged at 3400 rpm for 10 min. Subsequently, the supernatant was filtered through a sterilized 0.2-µm membrane filter (Whatman filter paper, No. 2; GE Healthcare UK Limited). To prevent fungal contamination, the culture medium was supplemented with cycloheximide (50 µg/mL) during the cultivation period.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative Analysis of Pineapple Stem Phenolics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The method for extracting the phenolic compounds was adopted from Kapcum et al. [32 (link)]. Native pineapple stem starch and ground extrudates (1 g) were extracted with 5 mL of 80% (v/v) ethanol in a 25-mL centrifuge tube and stirred continuously for 1 h at room temperature with a magnetic stirrer. The mixture was then sonicated with an ultrasonic cleaner for 30 min. The mixture was centrifuged at 4800× g for 20 min. The supernatant was filtered through Whatman filter paper No. 2 (GE Healthcare UK Limited, Buckinghamshire, UK).
The total phenolic content of the samples was determined according to the Folin–Ciocalteu method with a slight modification [32 (link)]. Briefly, the extract (125 µL) was mixed with 250 µL of Folin–Ciocalteu reagent and held for 5 min. To the mixture was added 25 mL of 7% (v/v) sodium carbonate and then allowed to stand for 90 min at room temperature. The absorbance of the mixtures was measured at 760 nm using a UV-VIS spectrophotometer (Lambda 25, PerkinElmer, Inc., Shelton, CT, USA). The TPC value was expressed as mg gallic acid equivalent per 100 g sample (mg GAE/100 g, db).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

MCPG Extraction and Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The extraction of MCPG was mixed with 70% ethanol at room temperature for 30 min using a magnetic stirrer. A funnel with a Whatman No. 2 filter paper (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Piscataway, NJ, USA) was loaded onto a Kimble filtering flask to filter the extracted MCPG. Subsequently, the filtrate as the final extract was dried at 105 °C in a hot-air dryer (HB-502M; HanBeak Scientific Co., Bucheon, Republic of Korea) until there was no change in weight. The extraction yield was calculated using the following equation: Extraction yield (%)=(W2W1)A×E E×100
W1: weight of empty aluminum dish (g)
W2: weight of aluminum dish and solid (g)
A: weight of dried ginseng (g)
E: total volume of extract (mL)
E′: used volume of extract (mL)
The filtrate was concentrated using a rotary vacuum evaporator (N-11, EYELA, Tokyo, Japan). For further analyses, concentrated samples dissolved in distilled water were aliquoted.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Preparation of Plant Extracts for Research

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 42 plant extracts were originally provided from the Korea Plant Extract Bank at Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KRIBB) (Ochang, Chungbuk, Korea) [42 (link)]. The ethanol extracts were prepared based on a previous report [43 (link)]. Briefly, after botanical authentication, the dried plant material was turned into powder using a grinding mill. Next, 100 g of plant powder was extracted in 1000 mL of 0%, 30%, 50%, 70%, and 100% aqueous ethanol solution (v/v) in an occasional shaker at room temperature for 72 h. The extract was then filtered with Whatman No. 2 filter paper (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Logan, UT, USA) to remove debris, and the filtrate was collected and concentrated in a rotating evaporator at 40–50 °C and lyophilized under reduced pressure. The dried extract was stored in amber flasks at 4 °C, re-suspended with distilled water, and filtered through a 0.22-μm membrane filter (Sartorius, Gottingen, Germany) before the experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Determination of Total Volatile Basic Nitrogen in Pork

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The total volatile basic nitrogen (TVBN) value of pork loin samples was determined using Conway’s micro-diffusion method [15 (link)]. Five grams of meat was homogenized with 45 mL of distilled water using a slap-type homogenizer (WS-400, Shanghai Zhisun Equipment Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) for 180 s. The homogenate was filtered using Whatman No. 2 filter paper (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA). After filtration, 1 mL of filtrate was placed on the outer side of a Conway dish containing 1 mL of 0.01 N H3BO3 mixture, and 100 μL of Conway solution (0.066% methyl red in ethanol: 0.066% bromocresol green in ethanol) was dropped into the inner side of the Conway dish. Next, 1 mL 50% K2CO3 was added to the outer side of the dish. The lid of the Conway dish was closed, and the dish was incubated at 37 °C for 2 h in a thermo-hygrostat (IL3-25A, JEIO Tech, Daejeon, Republic of Korea). The TVBN content was determined following the addition of 0.02 N H2SO4 to the inner side of the Conway dish. A blank test was performed following the same process without the addition of the homogenized samples. The TVBN value was calculated as follows: TVBN (mg/100 g)=14.007×(ab)×f×100×cS,
where a is the titration volume of the sample (mL), b is the titration volume of the blank (mL), f is the factor of H2SO4, S is the weight of the sample, and c is the dilution factor.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Extraction of Bioactive Compounds from Cereal Grains

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cereal grains such as black rice, brown rice, adlay, sorghum, oats, barley, and white rice were obtained from a local market in Cheongju, Korea. Each cereal grain (30 g) was washed with distilled water, dried, and milled into flour. Subsequently, 5 g of cereal flour was combined with 100 mL of methanol and shaken at 23°C for 18 h. The obtained mixture was filtered using Whatman No. 2 filter paper (GE Healthcare). Subsequently, the extraction solvents were eliminated using a vacuum evaporator (EYELA N-1000, Rikakikai Co.). The remaining residues were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and stored at −70°C until use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Extraction and Preparation of Verbena Bonariensis Methanol Extract

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The aboveground parts of VB were collected in Yunnan Province, China, in September 2012. A voucher specimen was deposited in the herbarium of the Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KRIBB, Daejeon, Republic of Korea). VB was obtained from the International Biological Material Research Center (IBMRC) of KRIBB. Air-dried VB was cut into small pieces and extracted three times with 100 g/L of 95% methanol at 85°C with a cooling system (40°C) for 3 h. The methanol extract was filtered through Whatman No. 2 filter paper (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) and the supernatant was concentrated under reduced pressure in a vacuum rotary evaporator (EYELA, N-1000, Tokyo, Japan). Finally, the supernatant was evaporated and spray dried to yield 112 g of VBME. The lyophilized powder was stored at −70°C and dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) prior to use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Chicken Meat Water Holding Capacity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The sample WHC was measured using the filter paper-press method [10 (link)] with slight modifications. Briefly,
each 0.3 g of uncooked chicken breast and thigh sample was placed onto Whatman
No. 2 filter paper (GE Healthcare, IL, USA) and compressed for 3 min using a
filter-press device. The WHC was calculated using the following methods by
measuring the meat- and exudation area. The following formula was used:
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Liver Lipid Staining with Oil Red O

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A frozen preserved portion of the liver of each rat was subjected to cryostat (Microm HM 505N, Barcelona, Spain) section to a thickness of 8 µm.
The stock solutions of oil red O were prepared by completely dissolving 0.5 g of oil red O (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) with 100 ml 2-isopropanol 60% (Sigma Aldrich, St Louis, Missouri, United States) using a magnetic stirrer and later it was boiled and filtered using a Whatman No. 2 filter paper (GE Healthcare Life Sciences). The samples were stained following the procedure recommended by the manufacturer. Finally, the nuclei were lightly stained by dipping the slides into haematoxylin solution (Casa Álvarez, Madrid, Spain) for 5 min and rinsing with distilled water for examination using light microscopy (Olympus BX50 microscopic system).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!