The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

16 protocols using hptlc silica gel 60 f254 plate

1

HPTLC Quantification of Gallic Acid in Plant Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gallic acid was quantified in EP extract and fractions by HPTLC fingerprinting [30 (link)]. Briefly, test solutions of EP extract/fractions were prepared at a 2 mg/mL concentration in methanol. Gallic acid solution was prepared at a concentration of 100 μg/mL in methanol. HPTLC Silica gel 60 F254 plate (Merck Life Sciences Ltd Pvt, Mumbai) with a dimension of 20 cm x 10 cm served as the stationary phase. Mobile phase was prepared by saturating the 20 cm x 10 cm Twin trough chamber with 10 mL of Toluene: Ethyl acetate: Formic acid: Methanol (3:3:0.8:0.2) for twenty minutes. Using the Camag Linomat 5 sample applicator, outfitted with liquid nitrogen tank, 10 μL per sample/standard was sprayed in the form of bands onto the HPTLC plate at a distance of 1.5 mm from the plate base. Sample solutions were loaded onto the sample applicator with a 100 μL HPTLC syringe (Camag Linomat syringe 695.0014, Hamilton Bonaduz, Schweiz). The plate was air dried and developed in the Twin trough chamber up to a distance of 80 mm from the point of application. Using Camag TLC Scanner 3, the HPTLC plate was scanned densitometrically under a scanning speed of 20 mm/s at a single wavelength of 280 nm. Subsequently, UV absorption spectrum of bands corresponding to gallic acid was examined at the same wavelength.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

HPTLC Analysis of Herbal Extract Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HPTLC (high-performance thin layer chromatography) was assessed to determine the main compounds of the two extracts. Two microliters of a hydroalcoholic solution of OG extracts (10 mg/mL) were applied to a HPTLC silica gel 60 F254 plate (Merck, Germany) as 6 mm wide bands with Linomat V (Camag, Switzerland). Then, the plate was eluted with a solvent solution (ethyl acetate/acetic acid/formic acid/water 10/0.5/0.5/2) in a chromatographic chamber. After development, the chromatogram was visualized at 254 nm and then was sprayed with natural product reagent A polyethylene glycol (NP/PEG) reagent and visualized at 366 nm to identify the phenolic fingerprinting of the two extracts. The flavonoids appeared as yellow-orange areas on a violet background [11 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Examining Glucose Metabolism in Nicotiana

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used one WOS-treated plant to analyze if [18F]FDG can be metabolized by N. attenuata plants. We applied 5 μL of [18F]FDG to a single punctured wound of a source-sink transition leaf of a 4.5 weeks old WT plant. Another younger leaf was treated with WOS. After 8 h, the plant was disassembled and leaf and root tissues (50 mg) were extracted with MeOH. 15 μL of the extract was applied to a 0.2 mm HPTLC silica gel 60 F254 plate (Merck) and chromatography was done using acetonitrile–water (17:3, v/v), containing 0.05% of 2-aminoethyl diphenylborinate. After chromatography, the plate was sprayed with detection reagent (4 g of diphenylamine and 4 mL of aniline dissolved in 160 mL of acetone, 20 mL of conc. H3PO4 added and filled to 200 mL with acetone) and heated up to 120°C for two minutes until bands were clearly visible. The plate was then transferred to an imaging cassette, covered with a positron imaging plate and scanned after 1 h exposure (FLA 3000 system, Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Chromatographic Analysis of Propolis Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Analysis of all obtained ethanolic extracts from propolis samples was performed on HPTLC Silica Gel 60 F254 plates (20 cm × 10 cm) purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Extracts (2 µL) were applied to the plate as 9 mm bands from the lower edge of the plate at a rate of 100 nL/s using a semi-automated HPTLC application device (Linomat 5, CAMAG, Muttenz, Switzerland).
The chromatographic separation was carried out in a chromatographic tank saturated for 20 min with the mobile phase and developed to a distance 70 mm. The results obtained were documented using an HPTLC imaging device (TLC Visualizer, CAMAG) under white light, UV 254, and 366 nm. In addition, each plate was derivatized using an automated Derivatizer of TLC plates (CAMAG Derivatizer) with p-anisaldehyde reagent. After derivatization, the plates were imaged under white light and 366 nm. The obtained chromatographic images were analyzed using HPTLC software (Vision CATS, CAMAG, Muttenz, Switzerland).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Phytochemical Analysis of Medicinal Plants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All chemicals and reagents used were of analytical grade. Chloroform, ethyl acetate, methanol, formic acid, and AlCl3 were purchased from POCH S.A. (Gliwice, Poland). Commercially available standards of rutin, apigenin, luteolin, caffeic acid, chlorogenic acid, and RA were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Poznan, Poland). HPTLC analyses were performed on 20cm × 10cm HPTLC silica gel 60 F254 plates (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

HPTLC Separation of Carbonylated Lipids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CHH-derivatized lipids were separated on HPTLC Silica gel 60 F254 plates (7 cm×10 cm, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) using a mixture of dichloromethane and acetonitrile (9:1; v/v). HPTLC plates were dried on air and immediately scanned (Biorad GelDoc EZ Imager, UV Tray; Bio-Rad Laboratories GmbH-Munich, Germany) to visualize carbonylated lipids. All lipid were detected by dipping the plate into primuline solution (0.02% in acetone/water, 8:2, v/v) and imaged (Biorad GelDoc EZ Imager, UV Tray).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

HPTLC Analysis of Natural Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The analyses were performed with the use of the CAMAG (Muttenz, Switzerland) HPTLC chromatography set, consisting of a semi-automated sample applicator (Linomat 5), an automatic developing chamber (ADC 2), a derivatizer and a visualizer. The extract samples were applied on the HPTLC plate (HPTLC Silica Gel 60 F254 plates, 20 cm × 10 cm, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) in a volume of 5 µL, as 8 mm wide bands. Two different systems for the mobile phase and derivatization reagent were used: A–mobile phase: ethyl acetate, acetic acid, formic acid, water (10:1.1:1.1:2.6) and derivatizing agent: Natural Product Reagent/Polyethylene glycol 400 (NP/PEG); B—mobile phase: chloroform, ethyl acetate, formic acid (5:4:1) and derivatizing agent: p-anisaldehyde reagent with heating in 110 °C (10 min). After derivatization, plates were photographed in visible light and UV (366 nm). The obtained images were analyzed using HPTLC software (Vision CATS, CAMAG, Muttenz, Switzerland).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

HPTLC Separation of Polar and Non-Polar Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All analyses were conducted by a CAMAG TLC system (CAMAG, Switzerland) containing an automatic TLC sampler 4 with a 25 μL syringe, a TLC visualizer equipped with visionCATS (version 2.5) software, a chromatogram immersion device III, and a TLC plate heater III. The HPTLC separations were performed on 20 × 10 cm HPTLC silica gel 60 F254 plates (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). The samples and mixed standards solution (4 μL) were applied as 6 mm bands and 10 mm from the bottom edge on the HPTLC plates. The syringe was washed with methanol three times between the applications of each substance. Firstly, the applied HPTLC plate was pre-saturated with dichloromethane-methanol-ethyl acetate-water (70:25:12:3, v/v/v/v) for 25 min in a glass twin trough chamber and developed over a path of 60 mm for the separation of high-polarity components. After the plate was dried under an airstream, the same plate was pre-equilibrated with dichloromethane-methanol (300:1, v/v) for 15 min in a twin trough chamber and developed to the distance of 90 mm to isolate the low-polarity compounds. Then, the developed plate was dried in a stream of cool air, immersed in 10% sulfuric acid in ethanol solution for one second, heated for 10 min at 105 °C on a TLC plate heater, and subsequently recorded under UV (366 nm) and white light.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantifying Carbofuran via TLC Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TLC silica plates (aluminium HPTLC silica gel 60 F254 plates, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) were cut into 5 cm × 5 cm or 5 cm × 10 cm pieces according to the purpose of the experiment. To measure the minimum detectable range, 5 μL of various concentrations (50–10,000 ppm) of carbofuran solution was spotted on a TLC plate and developed in 5:5 ethyl acetate/hexane. After the TLC plate was developed, it was allowed to dry for 3–5 min, and then spots were detected under UV light at 254 nm. For the qualitative evaluation of carbofuran using TLC, the concentration of carbofuran in the sample was 5000 ppm. Two millilitres of the culture extract were volatilized using a centrifugal vacuum concentrator (HyperVac, GYROZEN, Gimpo, Korea) connected to a cooling trap device (HyperCool, GYROZEN, Gimpo, Korea) at 37 °C until the solvent was completely evaporated. The residue was dissolved in 5 mL of acetone to make a 50-fold concentrated sample. Five microlitres of concentrated extracts were spotted on the plate with 5000 ppm carbofuran in acetone as a reference.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Echinacea Root Antioxidant Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The basic raw materials for the preparation of feed were obtained from ANIMEX Group S.A., Zamosc Branch. Dried Echinacea root was obtained from “A Herbal Farm Waldemar Lupa”, Poland.
Standards of rutin, gallic, cichoric, caftaric and caffeic acids, echinacoside as well as 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich Fine Chemicals (St. Louis, MO, USA).
Solvents used for HPLC were HPLC-grade, purchased from J.T. Baker (the Netherlands), and water was purified using a Millipore laboratory ultra pure water system (Simplicity™ system, Millipore, Molsheim, France). Methanol used for preparation of the extracts was of analytical grade and obtained from the Polish Reagents (POCH, Gliwice, Poland).
The TLC–DPPH test was performed on the HPTLC silica gel 60 F254 plates (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). The extracts were prepared using ultrasonic bath (Bandelin Electronic, Sonorex RK 100H, Germany). Samples were applied to chromatographic plates with the applicator Desaga AS-30 (Heidelberg, Germany). Absorbance was measured by a GENESYS™ 20 UV–Vis spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) in a 1 cm quartz cell.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!