The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Esquire hct ion trap mass spectrometer

Manufactured by Bruker
Sourced in Germany

The Esquire HCT ion trap mass spectrometer is an analytical instrument designed for the detection and identification of chemical compounds. It utilizes ion trap technology to capture, store, and analyze ionized molecules based on their mass-to-charge ratio. The Esquire HCT provides high-resolution mass analysis and can be used for a variety of applications in analytical chemistry and related fields.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using esquire hct ion trap mass spectrometer

1

HPLC-MS Analysis of Organic Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LC separations were carried out using an Agilent 1100 HPLC equipped with an ACE Excel 3 C18-PFP column (150 × 4.6 mm, 3 µm, 100 Å) and a flow rate of 0.6 ml/min. The solvents were 0.1% formic acid in water (A) and 90% CH3CN in water containing 0.1% formic acid (B). HPLC runs started with 5 min at 30% B followed by a linear gradient of 30% to 100% B in 28 min. After 3 min at 100% B in A, the system returned to 30%B in A in 2 min and the column was equilibrated for 25 min. The Agilent 1100 HPLC machine was coupled via a split system to an Esquire HCT ion trap mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonik GmbH). All MS and MS/MS spectra were acquired in positive mode within the 50 to 600 m/z range with an automatic selection of parent-ions for MS/MS fragmentation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Site-Directed Mutagenesis of AlbC Variants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genes coding the six new single point variants of AlbC (R80A, R102A, N159A, R160A, D163A, D205A) were obtained via polymerase chain reaction (PCR) mutagenesis of the plasmid pQE60-AlbC encoding C-terminal His6-tagged AlbC (5 (link)) according to the QuikChangeTM site-directed mutagenesis method (Stratagene). Sequences were verified by DNA sequencing. Plasmids encoding the other AlbC variants used in this study (R91A, K94A, R98A, R98A-R99A) were constructed previously (5 (link)).
The C-terminal His6-tagged proteins were produced and purified as described previously (2 (link),5 (link)). Purified proteins were quantified by UV spectrophotometry. Protein molecular weights were verified by electrospray ionisation mass spectrometry (Esquire HCT ion trap mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonik, GmbH)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

HPLC-MS Analysis of Cholesterol Oxidation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The total reaction was extracted on 1 mL chloroform. After evaporation of the solvent at room temperature, the product was dissolved in the solvent, which was the same as the mobile phase used for HPLC. 10 μL of the analyte sample were injected into a Phenomenex Gemini® 5 μ C18 110 Å column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 micron), and chromatography under isocratic conditions was performed using methanol:water 100:2 (v/v) at a flow rate of 0.8 mL/min at room temperature. Cholesterol and cholest-4-en-3-one were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and used as reference. Product formation was monitored at 200 and 250 nm, whereas cholesterol was detected at 200 nm. The Agilent HPLC 1100 system equipped with a DAD was coupled to an esquireHCT ion trap mass spectrometer (Bruker. Germany), and an atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) source was operated in the positive ion mode. Conditions were as follows: scan range, m/z 50–600; dry gas flow of 11 L/min, nebulizer pressure 35 psi, drying gas temperature 320°C and the APCI heater temperature was 350°C. The extracted ion current (EIC) signals were deduced based on the exact masses for protonated cholesterol after water elimination (m/z 369.34) as well as for the protonated oxidation product cholest-4-en-3-one (m/z 385.34).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Proteomic Analysis of LDL(+) and LDL(-) Particles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The protein contents in the LDL(+) and LDL(−) were evaluated by LC-ESI MS/MS on an Esquire HCT ion trap mass spectrometer (Bruker, Bremen, Germany) coupled with a nanoHPLC system (Ultimate, LcPackings, Netherlands) in the Laboratory of Proteomics at the Vall de Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR, Barcelona, Spain), as described in [28 (link)]. The lipoproteins were delipidated and solubilized according to Karlsson et al. [48 (link)], with minor modifications. The proteins were then digested with trypsin, and the proteomic analysis was performed by LC-ESI MS/MS using 5 µg of protein [28 (link)]. Proteins were identified using Mascot (Matrix Science, London, UK) to search the UniProtSwissProt 57.0 human database.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

HPLC-ESI-MS Analysis of Purified Fraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The purified fraction of interest was solubilized in HPLC grade MeOH at a 1 mg/mL concentration. It was analyzed using an Agilent 1100 HPLC (Santa Clara, CA, USA) mounted with an Inertsil ODS-3 3 µm 3 × 100 mm column and using the following gradient: acetonitrile: mQ water (85:15, solvent B) and mQ water (solvent A) + 0.2% formic acid and 12 mM ammonium formate. One minute of 53% B was followed by a linear increase of B to 100% at 17 min and an isocratic elution at 18 min. The gradient was then reversed at 6 min followed by a stabilization after 3 min at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min. The injected volume was 10 µL.
Then using an ESI-ion trap mass spectrometer (Esquire HCT ion trap mass spectrometer; Bruker, Rheinstetten, Germany), the fraction of interest was characterized. The ESI was operated in the positive mode. Mass spectrometer parameters were set as follows: capillary voltage -4500 V; endplate offset −500 V; nebulizer pressure 50 psi; dry gas flow rate 10 L/min; dry gas temperature 300 °C; skimmer 20.6 V; capillary exit 300 V; oct 1 DC 10 V; oct 2 DC 2.79 V; Lens 1–5.2 V; lens 2–72 V; oct RF 300 Vpp; trap drive 92.8. The scan range was optimized at 300–1250 m/z.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Analytical Techniques for Compound Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Thin-layer chromatography was performed using Merck TLC Silica gel 60 F254 or TLC Silica gel 60 RP-18 F254S. UV light (254 nm and 354 nm) and/or a 10 % H2SO4 stain were used to visualize the spots on TLCs. Column chromatography was performed on silica gel provided by Brunschwig (32–63 mesh, 60Å) prepacked columns. NMR measurements were carried out on a Bruker Avance III HD 500 MHz spectrometer (1H: 500 MHz, 13C: 125 MHz). Deuterated solvents were obtained from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories. HRESI-MS was performed on a MicrOTOF-Q mass spectrometer (Bruker, Germany). ESI-MS reaction monitoring was carried out using a Bruker esquire HCT Ion trap mass spectrometer. IR spectra were recorded on a Bruker FT-IR Tensor II using a Golden Gate diamond ATR system. Optical rotations were measured on a Perkin Elmer Polarimeter 241 using the sodium lamp (589 nm) and a 10 cm long cuvette. Microwave heating was performed on a Biotage Initiator Microwave using Biotage microwave vials. UV/VIS spectra were recorded on a UV/VIS Lambda 25,190–1100 nm. Irradiations were performed using Rayonet photochemical reactors.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Culture supernatants obtained after centrifugation of the culture were filtered on 0.2 µm MiniUniPrep filter (Whatman). When following “method A”, the filtered supernatants were analyzed on an Atlantis T3 column (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm, 30 °C) using an Agilent 1200 HPLC instrument equipped with a quaternary pump. Samples were eluted with isocratic 0.1% HCOOH in H2O (solvent A) / 0.1% HCOOH in CH3CN (solvent B) (95:5) at 1 ml/min for 5 min followed by a gradient to 100% solvent B over 45 min. Molecules that were present in the supernatant were detected by an Alltech 3300 evaporative light scattering detector (ELSD) (Grace).
When necessary, an analysis of the cell content was made. The mycelium pellet obtained after centrifugation of 2 ml of culture, was washed twice with 2 ml of water, suspended in 400 µl of water and broken down with glass beads using the FastPrep-24 apparatus (MP Biomedicals). A cell-free extract was obtained after centrifugation (13,000 g, 4 °C, 30 min) to remove cell debris.
LC-MS analyses were performed using an Agilent 1100 HPLC coupled via split system to an Esquire HCT ion trap mass spectrometer (Bruker) set in positive and negative modes. Multiple analyses were made. Some of them were made using “method A”, some other using the conditions described by15 (link) for CDPS 1–47 and called “method B”.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Peptide Separation by Reversed-Phase LC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Peptide separation by reversed-phase liquid chromatography was performed on an Ultimate LC system (Dionex) complete with Famos autosampler and Switchos II microcolumn switching device for sample clean-up and preconcentration. Sample (30 ml) was loaded at a flow rate of 200 nl/min on a micro-precolumn cartridge (300 mm i.d. x 5mm length, packed with 5 mm C18 100A PepMap). After 5 min, the precolumn was connected with the separating nano-column (75 µm x 15 cm, packed with C18 PepMap100, 3 μm, 100 Å) and the gradient started. Elution gradient varied from 0% to 30% buffer B over 30min, buffer A is 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile/water 2:98 (vol/vol) and buffer B is 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile/water 20:80 (vol/vol). The outlet of the LC system was directly connected to the nano electrospray source of an Esquire HCT ion trap mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics, Germany). Mass data acquisition was performed in the mass range of 50-1700 m/z using the Standard-Enhanced mode (8100 m/z/s). For each mass scan, a data-dependant scheme picked the 4 most intense doubly or triply charged ions to be selectively isolated and fragmented in the trap and the resulting fragments were mass analyzed using the Ultra Scan mode (50-3000 m/z at 26,000 m/z/s).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!