The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Sb aq column

Manufactured by Agilent Technologies
Sourced in United States

The SB-Aq column is a liquid chromatography column designed for the separation and analysis of a wide range of analytes. It features a silica-based stationary phase and is suitable for aqueous mobile phases.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

20 protocols using sb aq column

1

Xiaoyaosan Compound Analysis by HPLC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
1 g Xiaoyaosan powder was put into 25 mL of 70% methanol-water solution, then the mix solution was ultrasonic extracted for 30 minutes at room temperature, filtered at 0.22 μm filter, stored at 4°C.
Accela High performance liquid chromatography and LTQ Orbitrap XL were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific Company (America); methanol (HPLC Grade) and formic acid (HPLC Grade) were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific Company (America); reference standards were purchased from the Chengmust Company, Sichuan Province, China.
Xiaoyaosan was performed on high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) Accela 600 pump, LTQ Orbitrap XL (Thermo Fisher Scientific Company, America) using a SB-Aq column (4.6 × 250 mm, 5 micron, Agilent Technologies, USA), Capillary Voltage 2500 V–3000 V, Tubeleu 110 V, Scan range 100–1500, Sheath Gas 30 psi, and Aux Gas Flow 10 psi.
Method. The mobile phases comprised eluent A (0.1% formic acid) and eluent B (methanol). The gradient flow was as follows: 0~5 minutes, 30% B; 5~40 minutes, 30–90% B; 40~45 minutes, 90% to 100% B; 45~50 minutes, 100% B. The analysis was performed at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. The injection volume was 10 μL.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Untargeted Metabolomics Analysis of Botanical Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BRB and nectar samples were randomized for run order, and QC samples were positioned after every sixth injection. The use of QC samples allows for monitoring of instrument stability over the sample set. Untargeted full-scan data was acquired using a 1290 Infinity II series UHPLC (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA) coupled to an Agilent iFunnel 6550 QTOFMS. Samples were injected (3 μL) onto a 100 × 2.1 mm Agilent SB-Aq column (1.8 μm particle size) maintained at 50 °C. The mobile phase consisted of (A) 0.1% formic acid in water and (B) 0.1% formic acid in methanol at a flow rate of 0.6 mL/min. The mobile phase composition was as follows: 0–2 min, 0% B; 2–3 min increase to 10% B; 3–8 min, increase to 40% B; 8–14 min increase to 100% B; 14–16 min, hold at 100% B; 16–18 min, immediate switch to 0% B for a total run time of 18 min. The UHPLC was interfaced with the QTOF-MS with an ESI source operated in negative ion mode. Relevant MS parameters were as follows: gas temp 150 °C, drying gas 18 L/min, nebulizer 30 psig, sheath gas temp 350 °C, sheath gas flow 12 L/min, VCap 4000 V, nozzle voltage 2000 V, acquisition mode was 2 GHz extended dynamic range with a mass range of 50–1700 m/z.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

UPLC-QTOF Analysis of Phytochemicals

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The extract was analyzed by the UPLC system (Water, H-Class, Miford, MA, USA) coupled to a Q-TOF mass spectrometer equipped with an electrospray ionization interface (Bruker Impact II, Bremen, Germany). The LC separation was performed on an Agilent SB-Aq column (2.1 × 100 mm, 1.8 μm) with mobile phase A (0.1% formic acid in water) and mobile phase B (100% acetonitrile). The elution gradient was as follows: 0 min, 5% B; to 2 min, 7% B; to 3 min, 20% B; to 9 min, 24% B, and kept for 4 min; to 16 min, 26% B; to 18 min, 28% B; to 22 min, 34% B, and kept for 8 min; to 34 min, 36% B; to 35 min, 40% B; to 40 min, 50% B; to 50 min, 100% B, and kept for 5 min; to 55.1 min, 5%, and maintained for 5 min. The total run time was 60 min. The flow rate was 0.3 mL/min and column temperature was controlled at 35 °C. The mass data were acquired in the negative mode. The scan was set at a range of 50 to 1500 m/z. The capillary voltage was set at 3000 v for negative ion mode. The dry flow was set to 8 L/min, the nebulizer pressure was 2.0 bar, and the drying gas temperature was 200 °C. The prepulse storage was 8 μs, the collision RF was 750 Vpp, and the transfer time was 80 μs. The collision energies were set at 40–70 eV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Analytical Methods for Biomass and Metabolites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The glucose concentration was measured using an SBA-40D biosensor analyzer (Institute of Biology of Shandong Province Academy of Sciences, Shandong, China). The cell concentration was determined by measuring the absorbance at 600 nm (OD600) using a spectrophotometer (V-1100D; Mapada Instruments, Shanghai, China). The dry cell weight (DCW) per liter was calculated using an experimentally determined formula: DCW (g/L) = 0.27 × OD600 [77 (link)]. The amino acids in the culture supernatant were determined using high-performance liquid chromatography with a Zorbax Eclipse XDB-C18 column (4.6 mm × 150 mm, 5 μm; Agilent) at 40 °C and 360 nm after derivatization with 2,4-dinitrofluorobenzene. Mobile phase A was 55% (v/v) acetonitrile, and mobile phase B consisted of 40 mmol/L KH2PO4 at pH 7.0–7.2. The flow rate of the mobile phase was 1 mL/min. The organic acids in the culture supernatant were determined using high-performance liquid chromatography with a SB-Aq column (4.6 × 250 mm; 5 μm; Agilent) at 40 °C and 210 nm. Mobile phase A was acetonitrile, and mobile phase B consisted of 20 mmol/L KH2PO4 at pH 2.3. The flow rate of the mobile phase was 1 mL/min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Metabolomic Analysis of Porphyrins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were analyzed by the UIUC Metabolomics Center with the 5500 QTRAP LC/MS/MS system (AB Sciex, Foster City, CA) using a 1200 series HPLC system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) including a degasser, an autosampler, and a binary pump. The LC separation was performed on an Agilent SB-Aqcolumn (4.6×50 mm, 5 μm) (Santa Clara, CA) with mobile phase A (0.1% formic acid in water) and mobile phase B (0.1% formic acid in acetontrile). The flow rate was 0.3 mL/min. The linear gradient was as follows: 0–1 min, 100% A; 10–18 min, 5% A; 19–24 min, 100% A. The autosampler was set at 5°C. The injection volume was 1 μL. Mass spectra were acquired with positive electrospray ionization (ESI), and the ion spray voltage was 5500 V. The source temperature was 450 °C. The curtain gas, ion source gas 1, and ion source gas 2 were 32, 65, and 50, respectively. Multiple reactions monitoring (MRM) were used to monitor coproporphyrinogen III (m/z 655.4 --> m/z 596.3) and protoporphyrin IX (m/z 563.2 --> m/z 504.1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Metabolomic Analysis of Aphid Feeding

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
50 adult aphids were feeding on plant for 0 and 48 h, five biological replicates were used, and a previously established method was employed (Qi et al., 2016 (link)). In brief, samples were extracted with 80% methanol and then analyzed on an Agilent 1200 Rapid Resolution Liquid Chromatography (RRLC) system equipped with a ZORBAX SB-Aq column (2.1 × 100 mm, 1.8 μm) followed by an Agilent 6510 Q-TOF running in positive ionization mode. The column temperature was set at 50°C, and the flow rate was 0.3 mL min−1. All metabolites were identified based on pure standards, except some Bxs: DIMBOA was confirmed by comparing the Bx profiles between maize inbred line H88 and bx1 mutant (GRMZM2G085381); DIMBOA-Glc, DIM2BOA-Glc, HDMBOA-Glc, and MBOA were confirmed with purified standards, and the other putative Bxs were identified by their molecular masses. The abundance of each metabolite was estimated from the peak area. Peak detection and matching were performed using bioconductor XCMS and CAMERA packages (http://www.bioconductor.org/.) Samples (metabolites after integration) with P < 0.05 were considered to be differentially regulated. The acquired data were introduced to the SIMCA-P software package (v11.5, Umetric, Umea, Sweden) for Principal Component Analysis (PCA). The data was filtered by orthogonal signal correction (OSC) to remove variations from non-correlated factors.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Cell Density and Metabolite Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell density was measured by determining the absorbance at 600 nm (OD600) using a spectrophotometer (V-1100D; Mapada Instruments, Shanghai, China). The concentration of glucose was assayed using an enzyme electrode analyzer (SBA-40D; Institute of Biology, Shandong, China). After dilution and filtration of the culture supernatant and cell extract with ddH2O, nucleoside metabolites were determined using a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system (Agilent, USA) with an SB-AQ column (4.6 × 250 mm, 5 μm, Agilent) at 33 °C. Mobile phase A was 100% (v/v) methanol, whereas mobile phase B consisted of 0.5% (W/V) KH2PO4 at a pH of 4.5. HPLC was performed using a ratio of 90% A and 10% B at 1 mL/min with a monitor at 360 nm. All measurements were performed at least in triplicate and standard deviations (SD) were calculated from three independent experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantification of DNA Adducts by LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were analyzed with the QTRAP 5500 LC/MS/MS system (AB Sciex, Foster City, CA, USA) with the 1200 series HPLC system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) including a degasser, an autosampler, and a binary pump. The LC separation was performed on an Agilent SB-Aq column (4.6 mm × 50 mm, 5 µ) (Santa Clara, CA, USA) with mobile phase A (0.1% formic acid in water) and mobile phase B (0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile). The flow-rate was 0.35 mL/min. The linear gradient was as follows: 0–1 min, 100% A; 8–11 min, 25% A; 12–18 min, 100% A.
The autosampler was set at 5 °C and the injection volume is 5 µL. Positive mass spectrometry was achieved with electrospray ionization (ESI). The ion spray voltage was 5500 V. The source temperature was 400 °C. The curtain gas, ion source gas 1, and ion source gas 2 were 32, 65, and 50, respectively. Multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) was used to quantify O6 hydroxyethyldeoxyguanosine (m/z 312.2 àm/z 110.1), N7 hydroxyethylguanine (m/z 196.1 àm/z 110.1), and the internal standard deuterated O6 methylguanine (m/z 169.1 àm/z 70.1) (Figure 1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

HPLC-Q-TOF-MS Analysis of Flavonoids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The FP was dissolved in pure methanol and filtered through a 0.22 μm membrane before HPLC-Q-TOF-MS analysis. The liquid chromatography separation was performed on an Agilent SB-Aq column (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 4.5 μm, 400 bar) at 30°C. For HPLC analysis, 0.1% formic acid/water (v/v) and 0.1% formic acid/methanol were used as the mobile phases A and B, respectively. The gradient elution was programmed as follows: 0–110 min (35–90% B) and 110–120 min (90% B). The flow rate was 1.0 mL/min and the injected sample volume was 10 μL. The Q-TOF-MS scan range was set at m/z 100–1200 in positive modes. The dry gas (N2) flow rate was 9.0 L/min, the dry gas temperature was 350°C, the nebulizer gas was set at 30 psi, the capillary voltage was 3500 V, the fragmentor was 175 V, and the skimmer was 65 V.
Standard pinocembrin, kaempferol, isosakuranetin, pinobanksin-3-O-acetate, 12-acetoxyviscidone, galangin, and chrysin (purity > 98% by HPLC) were purchased from the National Institutes for Food and Drug Control of China. They were mixed and dissolved in pure methanol at the concentration of 2 μM per compound prior to use.
Data analysis was performed on an Agilent MassHunter Workstation Software-Qualitative Analysis (version B.04.00, Build 4.0.479.5, Service Pack 3, Agilent Technologies, Inc., 2011).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

RRLC-QTOF Metabolomics Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were extracted with 80% methanol and analyzed on an Agilent 1200 Rapid Resolution Liquid Chromatography (RRLC) system equipped with a ZORBAX SB-Aq column (2.1×100 mm, 1.8 µm) couple with an Agilent 6510 Q-TOF performed in positive ionization mode. The column temperature was set at 50 °C and the flow rate was 0.3 mL/min. Water with 0.1% formic acid and acetonitrile were used as mobile phases A and B, respectively. Mass spectrometric analysis was performed with nitrogen was used as the nebulizer gas at 45 psi and as drying gas at 350 °C with a flow rate of 9 l/min. The ESI spray voltage was 4,000 V and the voltage of the fragmentor was 175 V. Raw data files were exported in netCDF format and were processed as described by Kim and colleagues (2011) (link), including peak detection, retention time correction, and annotation of isotope and adduct ions using the bioconductor XCMS and CAMERA packages (http://www.bioconductor.org/). The peak areas were normalized to the total peak area, and peaks that were present in less than 80% samples were discarded from the total peak list to minimize the number of missing values. Peaks with CV values > 20% in quality control (QC) samples were deleted to ensure the reliability of the data. The known features were then used for the following analysis, and p < 0.05 was the standard for differential regulation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!