The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Pd l1 22c3 pharmdx kit

Manufactured by Agilent Technologies
Sourced in United States

The PD-L1 22C3 pharmDx kit is a qualitative immunohistochemistry assay designed to detect the PD-L1 protein in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) human tissue specimens. The kit utilizes the Agilent 22C3 monoclonal antibody to identify PD-L1 expression in tumor cells and immune cells.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using pd l1 22c3 pharmdx kit

1

PD-L1, CD8, and HLA Expression in LUSC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
IHC staining was performed on representative surgical tissue sections from FFPE tissue blocks of LUSC patients using anti–human PD-L1 antibodies: E1J2J, Cell Signaling Technology; 28-8, Abcam; 22C3, Dako; SP142, Spring Bioscience; anti–human CD8 antibodies (C8/144B; Nichirei Bioscience); anti–human PD-1 antibodies (NAT105; Abcam); anti–human β2M antibodies (A0072; Dako); and anti–human HLA class I-A/B/C antibodies (EMR8-5; Hokudo). The detection of immunostaining was performed using Histofine Simple Stain MAX-PO (Nichirei Bioscience) or BOND polymer Refine Detection kit (Leica Biosystems). Some of the sections were stained with the PD-L1 22C3 pharmDx kit (Dako). PD-L1 positivity was defined as membranous or cytoplasmic staining in at least 1% of tumor cells. The staining results of β2M and HLA class I-A/B/C of tumor cells were categorized as negative (0%), focally positive (<50%), or positive (≥50%).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

PD-L1 Immunohistochemical Staining Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) staining of 4 μm thick tissue sections was performed using the US Food and Drug Administration-approved PD-L1 22C3 pharmDx Kit (Dako North America Inc., Carpinteria, CA, USA) on the Dako Autostainer Link 48, as per the manufacturer’s instructions. The slides were assigned depending on the percentage of positive cells divided by the number of fields, to calculate the average value for each individual case, defined at 200× magnification. The PD-L1 combined positive score was calculated as the ratio of PD-L1-positive cells (tumor or immune cells) to the total number of tumor cells × 100 and classified as positive (≥1) or negative (<1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Evaluation of PD-L1 Expression in FFPE Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The expression of PD-L1 protein was evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC) performed on 4-µm formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue sections using a Dako PD-L1 22C3 pharmDx kit (Dako, Carpinteria, CA). PD-L1 protein expression was determined by using the tumor proportion score (TPS), and the cutoffs for low and high expressions were 1 and 50%, respectively (14 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

PD-L1 Immunohistochemistry Evaluation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for PD-L1 was performed at the Section of Anatomic Pathology and Histology of Perugia University, Italy, using the PD-L1 22C3 pharmDx kit (Dako North America Inc., Carpinteria, CA, USA) on the Dako Autostainer Link 48 according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Unstained tissue sections 4-m-thick were prepared from the most representative area of each case. At least 100 viable tumor cells were required for a valid interpretation of PD-L1 staining. Slides were counterstained with Mayer’s hematoxylin. Results were evaluated with known positive and negative tissue controls. The percentage of PD-L1 expression in the invasive tumor cells was calculated as the number of viable invasive carcinoma cells showing membranous staining of any intensity divided by the total number of viable invasive carcinoma cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

PD-L1 Expression Analysis by IHC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For PD-L1 expression analysis, IHC using an automated stainer (Link 48, Dako) was performed on 4μm sections cut from archival FFPE tumor samples from 232 patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer that were retrospectively selected from the QEII Health Sciences Centre. PD-L1 IHC using the PD-L1 22C3 pharmDx kit on the Dako platform (Product number: SK006) was performed according to manufacturer recommendations [17 (link)]. The positive and negative controls were from known PD-L1 IHC positive and negative cases confirmed by IHC testing. The pharmDx kit (Dako) is designed to perform the staining using a linker and a chromogen enhancement reagent. Pre-treatment of the slides including deparaffinization and rehydration was performed using PT Link machine. Next, the specimens were incubated with monoclonal mouse IgG antibody to PD-L1, followed by incubation with a mouse linker and with a ready-to-use Visualization Reagent consisting of Goat secondary antibodies against mouse immunoglobulin and horseradish peroxidase coupled to a dextran polymer backbone. Then, chromogen and chromogen enhancement reagents were added, resulting in a brown color at the site of the antigen-antibody interaction. All slides were cover slipped and visualized with a light microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

PD-L1 Immunohistochemistry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tumor PD-L1 analysis was performed in the Section of Anatomic Pathology and Histology of Perugia University, Italy. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for PD-L1 was performed using the PD-L1 22C3 pharmDx kit (Dako North America Inc., Carpinteria, CA, USA) on the Dako Autostainer Link 48, according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Unstained tissue section 4-μm thick were prepared from the most representative area of each case. At least 100 viable tumor cells were required for a valid interpretation of PD-L1 staining. Slides were counterstained with Mayer’s hematoxylin. Results were evaluated with known positive and negative tissue controls. The percentage of PD-L1 expression on invasive tumor cells was calculated as the number of viable invasive carcinoma cells showing membranous staining of any intensity divided by the total number of viable invasive carcinoma cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunotherapy in Advanced NSCLC Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Advanced NSCLC patients receiving a combination of immunotherapy and chemotherapy, or immunotherapy alone as the first- or second-line treatment at the Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (FUSCC) from January 2016 to July 2018 were enrolled in this study. All the patients had wild-type epidermal growth factor/anaplastic lymphoma kinase receptor. The patients were enrolled in clinical trials for ICIs, including nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, durvalumab, tremelimumab, and camrelizumab. The ICIs were administrated as per the study protocols, and the therapeutic effects were evaluated as a complete/partial response (CR/PR), stable disease (SD), or progressive disease (PD) according to the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) 1.1. This study was performed in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013). The Institutional Review Board of Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center approved the study (Date 2012-12-24; No. 050432-4-1212B), and all patients provided informed consent.
Tumoral PD-L1 expression was tested by immunohistochemistry (PD-L1 22C3 pharmDx kit, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) in archived tissue samples, when available, to calculate the tumor proportion scores (TPSs). 5 mL of peripheral blood samples were collected before immunotherapy from all the patients.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

PD-L1 and MMR Protein Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PD-L1 staining was done using the PD-L1 22C3 pharmDx kit on the Link 48 system autostainer (Agilent Technologies, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Combined positive score (CPS) was calculated as the number of PD-L1-expressing tumor and intra-or peri-tumoral inflammatory cells divided by the number of viable tumor cells and then multiplied by 100.
For the assessment of mismatch repair (MMR) status, tissue specimens were stained using MLH1 (Novo, Newcastle, UK), MSH2 (Cell Marque, CA, USA), MSH6 (Cell Marque, CA, USA), and PMS2 (Cell Marque, CA, USA) using a Bench Mark XT automatic immunostaining device with an OptiView DAB IHC Detection Kit (Ventana Medical System). dMMR was defined as the loss of expression of one or more of the MMR proteins (i.e., MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!