The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

75 protocols using avl buffer

1

Tick Identification and Nucleic Acid Extraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All ticks were morphologically identified using the identification keys of Apanaskevich et al. [14 (link)–16 (link)]. Individual ticks were homogenized in Buffer AVL (300 µl AVL buffer plus one 5-mm steel bead; Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) in a TissueLyser II (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The homogenates were cleared by centrifugation and the supernatants were used for nucleic acid extraction. DNA/RNA was extracted using a KingFisher Flex (ThermoFisher, Waltham, USA) with the NucleoMag VET kit (Macherey–Nagel, Düren, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. A selected number of ticks that were hard to determine, as well as CCHFV-positive specimens, were identified using partial cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 gene (CO1) Sanger sequencing and restriction fragment length polymorphism [17 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Exploratory Metagenomic Analysis of S. murinus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To perform initial exploratory metagenomic analysis, we selected 20 S. murinus and pooled their tissues for RNA extraction and sequencing. Approximately 1–2 g of tissue (lung, spleen, and kidney) was homogenized in 1 ml of AVL buffer (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) using silicon carbide shards and a Mini-Beadbeater-96 cell disrupter (Biospec Products, Bartlesville, USA) for 1 min at 2000 rpm. The homogenates were pooled and processed following our previous protocol [23 (link)], and RNA was extracted using Direct-zol RNA miniprep kit (Zymo Research Corporation, Irvine, USA) as per the manufacturer's instructions. For S. murinus (n = 37) molecular screening and subsequent sequencing, the lung, spleen, and kidney tissues from each individual shrew were separately weighed (1.3 to 27.6 mg) and homogenized in 500 μl of AVL buffer (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The whole tick was homogenized as above. Homogenates were centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 1 min, and the RNA extraction was performed on the supernatant as described above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Evaluating QIAstat-Dx SARS Assay Specificity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To assess the specificity of the QIAstat-Dx SARS assay toward other coronaviruses and various respiratory microorganisms included in the panel, each target was assessed using pools of three positive samples obtained during the last 6 months. An evaluation of pretreatment conditions was conducted. Various conditions were tested as follows: a prelysis step with AVL buffer (Qiagen), using a 4:1 ratio of AVL buffer and NPS sample; heating, 20 min at 65°C, used for viral safety (7 (link)); and proteinase K, used 1:10 at 20 mg/ml to reduce the viscosity of induced sputum.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Viral Load in Treated Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine viral load in mAb- or control-treated mice, whole lungs were thawed and homogenized in 1 ml of cold PBS, clarified by centrifugation, and serially titrated for infectious virus by standard plaque assay in Madin-Darby Canine Kidney (MDCK) cells as previously described (Zeng et al., 2007 (link)). The limit of virus detection was 10 PFU. Concurrently, clarified tissue homogenate was placed in AVL Buffer (Qiagen) to extract RNA for next generation sequence (NGS) analysis of the viral population.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Viral Diagnostic Protocol Database for ENIVD

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Within the European Network for Diagnostics of Imported Viral Diseases (ENIVD) we gathered a wide range of emerging viruses, as inactivated culture supernatants or as purified viral DNA or RNA (Table 1). Viruses were inactivated by heat and/or gamma-irradiation, or by suspension in an RNA-extraction reagent (TRIzol, Life Technologies; TriFast, Peqlab; AVL buffer, Qiagen) [27] (link). The majority of viruses were grown in Vero E6 cell-cultures (kidney epithelial cell line derived from African green gonkey) (ATCC CRL-1586), but poliovirus (PV) was grown in L20B cells (a murine recombinant cell line) [28] (link). We also used six control samples from the QCMD EQA programme for 2010 and 2013 (WNV10-01, WNV10-07, WNV13-01, WNV13-10, WNV13-11 and DENV13-01). The WNV13-01 sample contained West Nile virus (WNV) at a concentration of 1.0×107 copies/ml and the DENV13-01 sample contained Dengue virus (DENV) type 1 at a concentration of 1.0×106 copies/ml. The WNV10-01 and WNV13-10 samples contained a mixture of flaviviruses (DENV type 1, 2 and 4, and Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV)). The WNV10-07 and WNV13-11 samples contained a mixture of DENV type 3, tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) and yellow fever virus (YFV), each at a concentration of 1.0×106 copies/ml.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantification of Infectious Virus and Viral RNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Infectious virus was quantified by plaque assay using confluent MDCK (IAV) or Vero E6/TMPRSS2 (SCOV2) cells seeded in 12-well or 6-well plates, respectively, as previously described (26 (link), 66 (link)). Samples were incubated on cell monolayers for 1 h before removal of inoculum, and all plates were incubated at 37°C for 2 days prior to fixation with 70% ethanol and staining with crystal violet to observe plaques. Limit of detection for both viruses was 10 PFU.
For quantification of viral RNA, 140 μL of each sample (out of the total sample volume) was inactivated in 560 μL of AVL buffer (Qiagen) and stored at −80°C until extraction using the QIAamp 96 viral RNA mini-extraction kit and QIAcube HT automated high-throughput nucleic acid purification platform with a 100-μL elution volume (Qiagen). All samples were tested in duplicate by real-time RT-PCR using the CDC influenza virus/SARS-CoV-2 multiplex assay as previously described (26 (link)). Viral copy numbers in each specimen were quantified against a 10-fold serial dilution of IAV or SCOV2 viral RNA included on each plate. Mean viral RNA copy numbers were normalized and expressed as RNA copy number per milliliter (ferret specimens) or RNA copy number per liter of air (aerosol specimens); specimens with gene copy numbers of <1/μL of extracted RNA were declared negative.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

SARS-CoV-2 Detection via RT-PCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The complete virological analyses were performed via RT-PCR with a validated diagnostic protocol [18 ]. Briefly, swab or plasma samples were homogenized by short vortexing, 140 μL of the media containing sample material were transferred to a sterile 2-mL microcentrifuge tube holding 560 μL AVL buffer (Qiagen). Viral RNA was extracted with the QIAmp Viral RNA Mini kit (Qiagen). The RNA was used as template for two real-time RT-PCR reactions (SuperScriptTMIII One-Step RT-PCR System with PlatinumTM TaqDNA Polymerase, Thermo Fisher) to amplify the sequences of the SARS-CoV-2 E gene (primers E_Sarbeco_F1 and R2, and probe E_Sarbeco_P110) and an internal control for RNA extraction, reverse transcription, and amplification (innuDETECT Internal Control RNA Assay, Analytik Jena #845-ID-0007100), to minimize batch effects and ensure sample stability. Samples were considered positive for SARS-CoV-2 if amplification occurred in the virus-specific reactions and if the internal control's Ct value was within the expected range.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantifying EBOV Infection in Bat BMDCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BMDCs were utilized for infection studies between days 6 and 10 of culture. Cultures from each bat were infected with EBOV-Makona at a MOI of 3 for 1 h, thereafter BMDCs were washed with fresh media and were seeded into 48-well plates at a concentration of 2.5 × 105 cells/well. Mock uninfected control samples were also set up as a negative control. Cells were harvested at 1, 24, 48, and 72 h post-infection (hpi) and resuspended in RLT Buffer (Qiagen). Supernatants from cultures were also collected into AVL Buffer (Qiagen). RNA was extracted according to the manufacturer's instructions using RNeasy, for cell pellets, and Qiamp Kits, for cell supernatants (Qiagen). EBOV transcripts were quantified using a quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay targeting EBOV-VP30 with use of AgPath-ID One Step RT-PCR Kit (4387391, ThermoFisher). Reactions of 25 μl were formulated by addition of 3 μl of RNA sample to a master mix containing: 400 nm of forward and reverse primer, 200 nm of TaqMan Probe, 1 μl enhancer, 1X buffer, and 1X RT-PCR enzyme mix. The thermal profile included incubation at 15 min 45°C, 10 min 95°C, and 45 cycles of 15 s 95°C and 45 s 60°C. The sample CTs were compared to a standard curve, which was produced using EBOV in vitro transcripts of known concentrations that ranged from 101 to 107 copies. This standard curve was used to quantify copy numbers within each sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantifying EBOV Levels via Plaque Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Virus titer was measured by plaque assay on Vero E6 cells. Cells were plated in 6-well plates and grown to confluency. Virus was titrated from 10-1 to 10-6 in duplicate. Plaques were counted using neutral red stain; limit of detection was 25 PFU/ml.
RNA was isolated from WB using AVL Buffer and Viral RNA mini-kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). As previously described, primers/probe targeting the VP30 gene of ZEBOV-Makona were used for RT-qPCR39 (link). EBOV RNA was detected using the CFX96 detection system (BioRad Laboratories) using One-Step Probe qRT-PCR Kits (Qiagen) with the following cycle conditions: 50 °C for 10 minutes, 95 °C for 10 seconds, and 40 cycles of 95 °C for 10 seconds followed by 59 °C for 30 seconds. Threshold cycle values representing ZEBOV genome equivalents (GEq) were analyzed with CFX Manager Software, and data are shown as means ± SD of technical replicates. To create the GEq standard, RNA from ZEBOV stocks was extracted and the number of ZEBOV genomes calculated using Avogadro’s number and the molecular weight of the ZEBOV genome.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

SARS-CoV-2 RNA Extraction and Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patient samples were taken by clinical staff using appropriate personal protective equipment. Inactivation of samples occurred in their country of origin. Samples were then shipped to the Broad Institute or tested at the local center (Nigeria, Sierra Leone). Samples were inactivated in AVL buffer (Qiagen) or TRIzol (Life Technologies) following standard operating procedures. Samples were stored in liquid nitrogen or at −20 °C. RNA was isolated at the clinical site using the QIAamp Viral RNA Minikit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Poly(rA) and host rRNA were depleted using RNase H selective depletion, using 616 ng oligo (dT) (40 nt long) and/or 1000 ng DNA probes complementary to human rRNA. Samples then underwent RNase-free DNase using a kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. AMPure RNA clean beads (Beckman Coulter Genomics) were used to clean and concentrate samples. cDNA synthesis was performed using the Superscript III kit (Thermo Fischer) plus dNTPs, random primers, and SUPERASE-IN for first-strand synthesis. Then, the 10× second-strand buffer kit (New England Biolabs), plus Escherichia coli DNA ligase, E. coli DNA polymerase, Rnase H, and dNTPs were used for second-strand synthesis. Samples then underwent a final AMpure DNA beads clean-up30 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!