The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Tristar 2 3020

Manufactured by Micrometrics
Sourced in United States

The TriStar II 3020 is a surface area and porosity analyzer that uses gas adsorption techniques to measure the surface area and pore size distribution of solid materials. The instrument is capable of performing both single-point and multi-point surface area analysis, as well as pore size distribution analysis using the BJH (Barrett-Joyner-Halenda) method. The TriStar II 3020 is designed to provide accurate and reliable data for a wide range of materials, including catalysts, adsorbents, and porous solids.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

20 protocols using tristar 2 3020

1

Microstructural Characterization of Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM; S4800, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) was used to study the microstructural configuration of samples. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements were performed using a D/MAX-2500/PC diffractometer (Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan) with Cu-Kα radiation (λ = 0.15418 nm) at 40 kV and 100 mA. The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra were recorded using a VG ESCALAB 200i instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with pass energies of 100 and 20 eV for survey and high-resolution scans, respectively. The specific surface area was estimated by N adsorption–desorption measurements (TriStar II 3020; MicroMetrics, Norcross, GA, USA) following Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) theory.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Characterizing Composite Materials Using Advanced Techniques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The functional groups of the composite were obtained using Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR; Shimadzu Spectrometer, IR Prestige 21, Japan). The CHCFe and KBr were separately oven-dried at 393 K for 7 h, and stored in a desiccator before analysis. The spectrum of the CHCFe was recorded between 4000 and 400 cm–1. The surface feature of CHCFe was visualised using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM; Zeiss DSM 982 Gemini). The specific surface area, pore size distribution and total pore volumes of CHCFe were obtained by using BET (Brunauer, Emmett and Teller) multipoint technique, and BJH (Barret, Joyner and Halenda) from N2 adsorption–desorption isotherm at 77 K using a surface analyser (Micrometrics TriStar II 3020). The composite was also subjected to X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectroscopy to obtain its diffraction patterns using Philips X’pert MPD diffractometer (Netherlands), which was operated at 40 kV and 40 mA with CuKa radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å). By using pH drift method2 (link),5 (link),25 , the value of pH of the point zero charge (pHpzc) of CHCFe was obtained.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Characterization of APSW Material

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The material textural features were determined by using the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) technique measured from a Micrometrics TriStar II 3020 (version 2.00) system at −196 °C. Furthermore, porosity properties i.e. the pore size distribution (PSD) was analysed with the Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) and density functional theory (DFT) plots. The Raman spectra of the APSW material was performed using a WITec confocal Raman microscope (WITec alpha300 RAS+) operating with a 532 nm laser set at a 5 mW emitting power to minimize heating effects.
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis of the synthesized material was done using a Thermo Fisher photoelectron spectrometer fitted with a monochromatic Al Kα radiation X-ray source. A Zeiss Ultra-plus 55 field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM), operated at 1.0 kV was used to characterize the surface morphologies of the samples. TEM measurements were obtained using a cold field-emission JEOL F200 TEM operating at 200 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Surface Area and Pore Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
N2 adsorption isotherms were performed on Micrometrics Tristar II 3020 equipment. Initially, samples were preheated at 70 °C for 8 h under vacuum and the surface area was determined using the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method at −196 °C with P/Patm in the range of 0.01 to 0.35. The average diameter of mesopores and their distribution were calculated using the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) method with Halsey standards for the desorption isotherm. The micropore volume was calculated using the t-plot method and the standard isotherm of Harkins and Jura.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comprehensive Characterization of MMO Powders

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The crystallographic phase structure of the as-prepared materials was performed by X-ray diffraction (XRD) technique with Co-Kα radiation. The thermal characteristic of the MMO powder was appointed using an STA 503 BÄHR device at the range of 40–900 °C and a heating rate of 10 °C min−1 in the ambient atmosphere. In order to observe the surface morphology of both powders, a field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) with a MIRA3 TESCAN model was employed. The specific surface area of the materials was measured by utilizing the adsorption–desorption isotherms of nitrogen via the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET), and pore size distribution was computed by the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) method (Micrometrics TriStar II 3020). In addition, fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy (by PerkinElmer–Frontier) was utilized to recognize the functional groups on the surface of materials.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Characterization of Nano ZT and Nano ZT/Vit B12

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The formed Nano ZT and Nano ZT/Vit B 12 were characterized by XRD (PANalytical Empyean, Sweden). An accelerating voltage of 40 KV was applied, using scan angle ranging from 5 to 80°, a scan step of 0.05°, and a 30 mA current. A Bruker devise (vertex 70 FTIR-FT Raman) was used to investigate the vibration of the chemical bonds. A Germany spectrophotometer (serial number 1341) screening the frequency range of 400–4000 cm−1 was applied using a potassium bromide disc. The surface morphology of the prepared materials was investigated using a scanning electron microscope (SEM), Germany. EDX (Quanta FEG250, Germany) was performed to determine the elemental composition in the synthesized materials. The BET specific surface area, pore volume and pore size distribution of the Nano ZT were estimated by N2 adsorption–desorption method by an automatic surface analyzer (TriStar II 3020, Micrometrics, USA). High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) (JEOL-JEM 2100) was applied to determine the microstructures of the produced materials. XRF analysis was performed on the natural Nano ZT to confirm the structure using XRF-ARL-9900. The partial size and zeta potential were investigated [20 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Platinum-Doped Boron Carbide Catalysts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
As received B4C (NaBond Technologies Co., Ltd.) was stirred in conc. nitric acid (Kimix Chemicals and Lab Supplies cc.) at room temperature for 8 h. Organo-metallic chemical deposition was used to deposit platinum onto the treated B4C to prepare 10, 20 and 40 eq. wt% Pt/BC, where the eq. wt % was calculated from surface areas calculated from nitrogen physisorption using a TriStar II 3,020 (Micrometrics) and interpreted using BET theory. The catalyst deposition was carried out using platinum acetoacetate (Sigma Aldrich) at 350 °C under an argon atmosphere68 69 . As-received Pt/C catalysts from Alfa Aesar (HiSpec 2000, 3000, 4000) were used as a commercial standard for electrochemical activities.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Specific Surface Area of Respirable Dust

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Due to sampling limitations for respirable dust, specific surface area was determined on the total “settled” dust fraction (which included respirable), that was deposited in the chamber as the stones were machined. The samples were pre-weighed and degassed overnight at room temperature prior to analysis by the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method on a surface area and porosity analyser (Micrometrics Tristar II 3020, Norcross, GA, United States), applying nitrogen as the adsorbate gas at −196 C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Colloidal SBA-15 Characterization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The hydrodynamic diameter and Z-potential of the prepared colloidal solutions (100 μg mL−1) were measured by Zetasizer Nano ZS90, (Malvern Instruments, Instruments Worcertershire, Worcertershire, UK). The measurements were performed at 25 °C, in triplicate, using disposable polystyrene cuvettes. TEM micrographs were taken with a JEM-JEOL-2100 microscope. The samples were suspended in ethanol and deposited dropwise onto formvar–carbon grids. We used ImageJ v1.53o to measure the length, width, and pore width of SBA-15 particles [41 ,42 (link)]. XRD (X-ray powder diffraction) patterns were measured in a Panalytical EMPYREAN diffractometer using CuKα (λ = 1.54184 Å). The interval of XRD analysis was 5–60° 2θ, with a step size of 0.01° and 1 s of measure time for each step. The diffractograms were analyzed using the X’Pert High Score software [43 ]. Nitrogen adsorption/desorption experiments were carried out with in a TriStar II-3020 (Micrometrics) device at 77 K. Before analyses, the samples were treated in a vacuum (103 torr) at 300 °C for four hours using a Micrometrics VacPrep 061−Sample degas system. The specific surface area was estimated using the Brunauer Emmet Teller (BET) model. Pore size distributions were calculated using the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) model. The average pore size and volume were estimated based on the desorption branch of each isotherm of nitrogen.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Comprehensive Materials Characterization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The powder XRD patterns were obtained using a Bruker diffractometer at 40 kV, 40 mA, with Cu Kα1 radiation. The morphology of all the products was revealed using field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM, Hitachi S-4800). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was performed on a JEOL JEM-2100F with an acceleration voltage of 200 kV. The The N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms were measured at 77 K using a Micrometrics Tri Star II 3020 apparatus. Thermogravimetric (TG) analysis was performed using a simultaneous thermal analysis instrument (Setaram Labsys Evo S60/58458) at a temperature ramping rate of 5 °C min−1 in air. The surface electronic states of Mn were analyzed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, VG Multilab 2000).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!