The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Eclipse plus c18 rrhd

Manufactured by Agilent Technologies
Sourced in United States, Germany

The Eclipse Plus C18 RRHD is a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) column designed for reversed-phase chromatography. It features a C18 stationary phase and is suitable for a wide range of applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

19 protocols using eclipse plus c18 rrhd

1

Analytical Characterization of Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Optical rotations were determined with a Unipol L1000 Schmidt + Haensch polarimeter at the sodium D line (589.3 nm), at 20 °C, with a 10 cm cell. UV spectra were acquired in spectroscopic grade CHCl3 or MeOH on a Varian, Cary 100 UV-Vis spectrophotometer. IR spectra were recorded on a Perkin Elmer 400 or a Perkin Elmer Spectrum One ATR FT-IR spectrometer. NMR spectra were acquired using a Jeol 400 MHz, a Varian 500 MHz or an Agilent 600 MHz spectrometer. Chemical shifts are given on the δ (ppm) scale, referenced to the residual solvent signal (CDCl3: δH 7.24, δC 77.0 or C6D6: δH 7.16, δC 128.0), and J values in Hz. High-resolution mass spectrometric data were measured on an Agilent QTOF 6540 MS system, with electrospray ionisation (ESI) in the positive ion mode, coupled to an Agilent 1290 Infinity UPLC system, operating on the elution gradient: 50% B for 8 min, increasing to 100% B in 3 min, maintaining 100% B for 5 min (solvent A: H2O + 0.1% formic acid, solvent B: MeCN + 0.1% formic acid), on a Zorbax Eclipse Plus C18 RRHD (50 × 2.1 mm, 1.8 μm) column, at 0.5 mL/min, with UV detection at 200−600 nm. Thin layer chromatography (TLC) was performed with Kieselgel 60 F254 aluminium support plates (Merck) and spots were detected after spraying with 6% vanillin and 15% H2SO4 in MeOH reagent. All solvents were of HPLC or LCMS grade and were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantification of Betulin in Nanoemulsions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Betulin was isolated from the nanoemulsion by employing methylene chloride for extraction, followed by centrifugation and subsequent evaporation of the organic layer to yield a desiccated residue that was reconstituted in HPLC-grade methanol. The betulin content was determined using an Agilent 1290 Infinity chromatographic system (Agilent, Carpinteria, CA, USA) on a reversed stationary phase column (ZORBAX Eclipse Plus C18 RRHD with dimensions of 2.1 × 50 mm and 1.8 µm) with an operating pressure of up to 1200 bar. The mobile phase consisted of a mixture of water and acetonitrile (20:80 (v/v)) with a flow rate of 0.35 mL/min, an injection volume of 2 µL at 35 °C, a detection wavelength of 210 nm, and a slit width of 4 nm. Identification and quantification of betulin were performed using a calibration curve of 24–56 µg/mL, and 2 µL of betulin was dispensed into the chromatographic system in triplicate. To determine the concentration of betulin in the emulsion, samples packed in vials were enclosed in a constant climate chamber “Binder KBF 240” (Binder, Tuttlingen, Germany) at a temperature of 55 °C. Every 180 h, the vial was removed, cooled, and visually assessed for the degree of emulsion separation, as well as the mass concentration of betulin using HPLC.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Reverse-HPLC for Global DNA Methylation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Global DNA methylation analyses were performed using reverse-HPLC (Quinlivan and Gregory, 2008 (link)) by measuring total 5-methylcytosine (5mC) content in 136 patients. Briefly, 2500 ng genomic DNA were RNase-treated in NEB2.1 buffer and incubated for 1 h at 37 C, purified with ethanol and lyophilised. The sample was re-suspended in 50 μl RNase-free water and hydrolysed overnight in a solution containing 45 mM NaCl, 9 mM MgCl2, 9 mM Tris pH 7.9, ⩾250 U/ ml−1 Benzonase (Sigma), 50 mU/ ml−1 Phosphodiesterase I, ⩾20 U/ ml−1 Alkaline phosphatase, 46.8 ng/ ml−1 EHNA hydrochloride, 8.64 μM deferoxamine. Protein components were removed with Amicon centrifugal filter units (3 kDa cutoff, Millipore, Watford, UK) and resolved with an Agilent UHPLC 1290 (Stockport, UK) instrument fitted with Eclipse Plus C18 RRHD 1.8 μm, 2.1 × 150 mm column. Buffer A was 100 mM ammonium acetate, pH 6.5; buffer B was 40% acetonitrile, and the flow rate 0.4 ml min−1. The gradient was between 1.8 and 100 of 40% acetonitrile. Methylation was also assayed in blood and bowel DNA separately.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Metabolite Extraction and Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The fermentation broth of mutants was extracted by EtOAc, and the organic solvent was combined and concentrated in vacuo to obtain crude extract. The extraction was redissolved in MeOH and filtered using 0.22 μm organic membranes to inject into HPLC analysis at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The solvent gradient system for HPLC was 0–5 min 100–80% A, 5–35 min 80–40% A, 35–50 min 40% A, 50–55 min 40–0% A, 55–60 min 0–100% A, and 60–65 min 100% A (A: 5% ACN/H2O with 0.05% formic acid, B: 100% ACN with 0.05% formic acid). The LC-HRMS analysis was carried out on an Agilent C18 column (Eclipse Plus C18 RRHD, 2.1 × 50 mm). The positive mode electrospray ionization was performed with a linear gradient of 10–100% acetonitrile in ddH2O with 0.1% formic acid over 6.5 min, followed by 100% acetonitrile for 1.5 min with a flow rate of 0.6 mL/min. The LC-HRMS spectra were recorded on an Agilent 1290 Infinity II coupled to 6545 LC/Q-TOF.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

LC-MS/MS Analysis of Compounds 1 and 2

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Stock solutions of compounds 1 and 2 were prepared by dissolving 0.1 mg of sample in 200 μL MeOH. The solution was further diluted with MeOH, filtered through a 0.45-μm hydrophobic PTFE filter, and finally analyzed by LC/MS/MS, Agilent 1290 Infinity II series with 6545 LC/quadrupole time of flight (Q-TOF) mass spectrometer (Agilent Technologies). Analysis was performed by injecting 1 μL of the sample using an Agilent Eclipse Plus C18 RRHD (1.8 μm, 2.1 × 50 mm) set at 30 °C. The mobile phase consisting of formic acid in H2O (0.1% (v/v)) (A) and formic acid in acetonitrile (0.1% (v/v)) (B) was delivered at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min by applying the following programmed gradient elution: 0–3.0 min, 10% (B); 3.0–10.0 min, 10–100% (B); 10.0–12.0 min, 100% (B); 12.0–15.0 min, 10% (B). The MS system was equipped with an ESI source and operated in both negative and positive ionization modes with a data acquisition range from 100 to 600 m/z.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantification of Compound 1 by LC/MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Stock solution of compound 1 was prepared by dissolving 0.1 mg of sample in 200 μL MeOH. The solution was further diluted with MeOH, filtered through a 0.45 μm hydrophobic PTFE filter, and analyzed using LC/MS/MS, Agilent 1290 Infinity II series with a 6545 LC/Q-TOF mass spectrometer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The analysis was conducted by injecting 1 μL of the sample using an Agilent Eclipse Plus C18 RRHD (1.8 μm, 2.1 × 50 mm) set at 30 °C. The mobile phase consisting of formic acid in H2O (0.1% (v/v)) (A) and formic acid in acetonitrile (0.1% (v/v)) (B) was delivered at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min by applying the following programmed gradient elution: 0–3.0 min, 10% (B); 3.0–10.0 min, 10–100% (B); 10.0–12.0 min, 100% (B); 12.0–15.0 min, 10% (B). The MS system was equipped with an ESI source and operated in both negative and positive ionization modes with a data acquisition range from m/z 100 to 600.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

HPLC-MS Analysis of RR Components

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The main active components of RR [purchased from Nordicon Weiguang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Sichuan, China)] were analysed using HPLC-MS. Eclipse Plus C18 RRHD (1.8 μm, 2.1 × 50 mm) (Agilent Technologies, DE, USA) was utilized for separating samples, with the temperature maintained at 30 °C and flow rate of 0.4 mL/min. The mobile phase was composed of 0.1% formic acid (55%) and methanol (45%). Each sample had an injection volume of 1 µL. Positive and negative ion modes were used for mass spectrometry. For the positive ion mode, the gas pressure was set to 40 psi, and the ion spray voltage was 500 V at a temperature of 350 °C. For the negative ion mode, the ion spray voltage was set at −1500 V, while the remaining parameters were consistent with those in the positive mode.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Peptide Quantification via RP-UHPLC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The samples were separated on‐line with a RP‐UHPLC column (EclipsePlusC18 RRHD 150 x 2.1 mm i.d., 1.8 μm particle diameter; Agilent) maintained at 50°C. Peptide separations were performed at 0.4 ml⁄min over a 56 min run, via a multi‐step LC gradient (1.5–81% 2–80%mobile phase B; mobile phase B: 0.1% FA in ACN). The exact gradient was as follows (time point in min, solution B %): 0 min, 2%; 2 min, 7%; 50 min 30%; 53min, 45%, 53.5 min, 80%; 55.5 min, 80%; 56 min, 2%. A post‐column equilibration of 4 min was used after each sample analysis. The LC system was interfaced to a triple‐quadrupole mass spectrometer (Agilent 6495/Agilent 6490) via a standard‐flow ESI source, operated in the positive ion mode. The MRM acquisition parameters used for the quantitation were as follows: 3500 V capillary voltage, 300 V nozzle voltage, 11 L/min sheath gas flow at a temperature of 250°C, 15 L/min drying gas flow at a temperature of 150°C, 30 psi nebulizer gas pressure, 380 V fragmentor voltage, 5 V cell accelerator potential, and unit mass resolution in the first and third quadrupoles. For optimal peptide collision induced dissociation, peptide‐specific collision energy values had previously been determined experimentally.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantification of FGAR in MPNST Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tumors harvested from B6 flank MPNST treated with either vehicle or JHU395 (1.2 mg/kg p.o.) as above were snap frozen in liquid nitrogen. Metabolites were extracted from tumor by protein precipitation. 5 μL of methanol containing 10 μM deuterated N-Acetylaspartic acid (internal standard) was added per mg of tissue. Tissue samples were homogenized and centrifuged (16,000 × g, 5 min). A standard concentration curve of FGAR (37 (link)) in untreated tumor tissue was prepared (0.3 – 1000 μmol/g). For quantification, supernatants (2 μL) were injected and separated on an UltiMate 3000 UHPLC coupled to Q Exactive Focus orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham MA). Samples were separated on an Agilent EclipsePlus C18 RRHD (1.8 μm) 2.1 × 100 mm column. The mobile phase consisted of 8 mM dimethylhexylamine (DMHA) + 0.005% formic acid in water, pH 9 (A), and of 8 mM DMHA in acetonitrile (B). Separation was achieved at a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min using a gradient run. Quantification was performed in Full MS negative mode. Data were acquired and quantified with Xcalibur software. FGAR content was averaged by group and analyzed by t-test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Time-Dependent Analysis of SCD-153 Compound

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Solid SCD-153 was incubated at room temperature for 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 14, 21, 28, 63, and 84 days. On the day of analysis, each sample was dissolved in DMSO to make a 100 mM stock solution, which was further diluted to 10 µM in methanol for analysis using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). Samples were analyzed on an Agilent 1290 HPLC coupled to Agilent 6520B QTOF equipped with ESI Dual source (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). SCD-153 was resolved on an Agilent EclipsePlus C18 RRHD (1.8 µm) 2.1 × 100 mm column. The mobile phase consisted of LC–MS grade water + 0.1% formic acid (A) and acetonitrile + 0.1% formic acid (B). Separation was achieved using a gradient run at a flow rate of 0.4 mL/minute. The mass spectrometer was operated in a positive ion mode at 350°C with drying gas and nebulizer set at 40 psig. Mass spectrometry data were analyzed with the MassHunter Quantitative Analysis software (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!