The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

13 protocols using ms200 microarray scanner

1

GeoChip-Based DNA Profiling Workflow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Approximately 50 ng of DNA separated from heavy fractions in warming or control samples were amplified using a Templiphi kit (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK). The amplified DNA (2 μg) was labeled with fluorescent dye (Cy-3) dUTP using random primers and Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase I at 37 °C for 6 h, followed by heating at 95 °C for 3 min. Labeled DNA was then purified, dried in a SpeedVac at 45 °C for 45 min, and re-suspended in 43.1 μl of hybridization buffer containing 27.5 μl of 2X HI-RPM hybridization buffer, 5.5 μl of 10X CGH blocking agent, 2.4 μl of cot-1DNA, 2.2 μl of universal standard, and 5.5 μl of formamide. DNA was hybridized with GeoChip 5.0 (60 K) in a SL incubator (Shel Lab, Cornelius, OR, USA) at 67 °C for 24 h. Then, GeoChip arrays were washed and scanned by an MS 200 Microarray Scanner (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) at 532 nm and 635 nm. Raw signals from the scanning were processed by an online pipeline as previously described [58 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Transcriptome Analysis of Grape Fruit Development

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNAs were extracted using a CTAB extraction buffer from 3 g of frozen fruit flesh tissue ground in liquid nitrogen, as described in Nobile et al., [15 (link)] and Rienth et al., [115 (link)]. mRNAs were amplified, labelled and co-hybridized according to Celton et al., [36 (link)] as following: aRNAs were produced with Message AmpII aRNA amplification kit (Ambion) from 200 ng of total RNA. Then, 5 μg of each aRNAs were retrotranscribed and labelled with either Cyanine-3 or Cyanine-5 fluorescent dye (Interchim, Montluçon, France). Labelled samples were combined as 30 pmol for each dye and co-hybridized to the Nimblegen microarray AryANE v1.0 containing 135,000 60-mers oligonucleotide probes as described in Celton et al., [36 (link)]. Deva software (Nimblegen) was used to extract pair-data files from the scanned images, obtained using the MS200 microarray scanner (Roche Nimblegen).
Genotypes were associated in 4 pairs (I062/V083, V034/W029, H097/I095, I016/H074) for competitive hybridizations at each time point (60 DAF, 110 DAF, H, 1 M and 2 M). Two independent biological repeats were performed with fruits from PH or P12 plots and technical replicates with dye swap were included for a total of 38 arrays.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Pea Aphid Microarray Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The “INRA-BF2I_A.pisum_Nimblegen-ACYPI_4x72k_v1” microarray for the pea aphid was developed in collaboration with Roche NimbleGen using the pea aphid genome v1.0 assembly (International Aphid Genomics Consortium, 2010 (link)). This NimbleGen 385K 4-plex (4 × 72 000 probes) high-density array can accommodate 4 samples that are hybridized onto a section of the array containing 72 000 60-mers oligonucleotide probes, representing 24 011 pea aphid transcripts (corresponding to 23855 genes) as described in Rabatel et al. (2013) (link). The microarray design can be found in the ArrayExpress database (Accession No. A-MEXP-1999). Labeling (using the NimbleGen One-Color DNA Labeling Kits and Cy3 Random Nonamers), hybridization on the arrays (at 42°C for 16–20 h) and scanning (using MS 200 Microarray Scanner and the MS 200 Data Collection Software) were carried out by Roche NimbleGen, as described in the NimbleGen arrays user’s guide for gene expression arrays. All the transcriptomic data obtained are available in the ArrayExpress database (Accession No. E-MTAB-4456).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Metagenomic Analysis of Diazotrophic Community

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The diazotrophic community was analyzed with a microarray-based tool (GeoChip 5.0), which is the latest version of GeoChip. This microarray contains 161,961 probes belonging to 1,447 gene families, including genes involved in crucial biogeochemical processes (e.g., C, N, P, and S cycling) (63 (link)), among which there are 1,331 probes of the nifH gene. For each sample, 1 µg of template DNA was labeled with Cy3 dye, purified with the QIAquick purification kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA) as previously described (64 (link)), and hybridized with GeoChip 5.0 M microarrays at 67°C with 10% formamide for 24 h. Subsequently, the microarrays were washed, dried, and scanned on an MS 200 microarray scanner (Roche, South San Francisco, CA, USA). Images were quantified into signal intensities with Agilent’s Data Extraction software. Raw signal intensities were uploaded to the Microarray Data Manager of the Institute for Environmental Genomics at the University of Oklahoma (http://ieg.ou.edu/microarray/) for quality control, normalization, and analysis. We normalized the signal intensity of each spot by mean ratio, removed spots with a <2 signal-to-noise ratio (65 (link)), and removed outliers based on standard deviations, as described previously (66 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

GeoChip 4.0 Microarray Data Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Purified DNA was labeled with Cy3, dried, rehydrated, and hybridized with GeoChip 4.0 as described previously54 (link). These arrays were scanned with 100% laser power and a photomultiplier tube using a MS 200 Microarray Scanner (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). The signal intensity of each spot was quantified using ImaGene software (Arrayit, Sunnyvale, CA, USA), and poor-quality spots with a signal/noise ratio (SNR) < 2.0 were discarded prior to statistical analyses54 (link).
Raw GeoChip data were uploaded to the GeoChip data analysis manager (http://ieg.ou.edu/microarray/) and pre-processed using the data analysis pipeline as previously described54 (link). The following major steps were performed: (i) removal of poor quality spots (SNR < 2.0); (ii) normalization of the signal intensity of each spot based on the mean signal intensity across all genes on the arrays; and (iii) transformation of the data using the natural logarithmic form. Pre-processed GeoChip data were used for further statistical analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

E. coli Transcriptome Microarray Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A double-stranded cDNA synthesis kit (InvitroGen) was used to produce cDNA from 2 μg of total RNA. cDNA (1 μg) was labeled using the one color DNA labeling kit (Nimblegen – Roche) and labeled cDNA (2 μg) was hybridized onto E. coli K-12 gene expression arrays (Nimblegen – Roche) for 17 h at 42 °C according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Arrays were washed and then scanned with a MS200 Microarray Scanner (Nimblegen – Roche). The images were analyzed with DEVA 1.2.1 software. Only raw data were used for further analyses. All array procedures were performed by the GeT-Biopuces platform (http://get.genotoul.fr).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Salting-out DNA Extraction from Tumor Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The salting-out protocol [26 (link)] was used to extract genomic DNA from fresh-frozen tumor tissue samples. Based on the obtained DNA quality, 7/8 tumors were eligible for genomic analysis using array comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH) at the average resolution of 150 kbp (Cytosure ISCA UPD 4x180k, Oxford Gene Technology). Sex-mismatched Human Genomic DNA (Promega) was used as the reference control DNA. Arrays were scanned at 2 µm with MS200 Microarray Scanner (Roche) and analyzed using Feature Extraction (Agilent Technologies) and Nexus Copy Number 8.0 (BioDiscovery) softwares. A minimum of five consecutive probes were required to define a region as a copy number aberration (CNA). All identified genomic imbalances were verified against the in-house database of > 1000 benign copy number variations (CNVs) identified in local population and in the online Database of Genomic Variants (DGV; last accessed on June 2017) [27 (link)]. Numbering of map positions was based on hg19/GRCh37 reference sequence.
The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Medical University of Gdansk, Poland. Written informed consent was obtained from the relevant guardians of the children.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Microarray-based DNA Methylation Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The hybridized arrays were scanned on an MS200 microarray scanner (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) at a resolution of 2 µm. The raw methylation data were extracted with the default ChIP protocol from software NimbleScan for 385 K arrays and with DEVA for 2.1 M arrays. Methylation ratios between the IP DNA samples and the control input samples were normalized across samples using the quantile method after performing a variance stabilization using log2 scaling for each promoter feature on the array. All data processing including mapping of microarray probes to promoters, gene annotation, data post-processing, principal component analysis, identification of differentially methylated regions, and graphics were performed with in-house developed functions in Matlab51 (link),52 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Transcriptome Analysis of Trichoderma reesei

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mycelial samples from the one litre bioreactors were collected by vacuum filtration on Whatman GF/A filter paper and then rinsed in 0.9% NaCl and frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen. RNA was isolated from 50 mg of the mycelia with RNeasy Plant RNA isolation kit (Qiagen GmbH. Hilden, Germany). RNA quality was assessed for purity and quantity using an Agilent RNA 6000 analyser (Agilent Technologies Inc. Santa Clara, CA, United States of America) The purified RNA was then converted into cDNA using an Invitrogen Superscript Double-Stranded cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo) prior to labelling with Cy3 One-Colour fluorescent dye (Roche NimbleGen Inc. Basel, Switzerland) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The labelled cDNA was hybridised on an automated HS12 system (Roche) to custom-made four plex microarray slides (Roche) designed from the T. reesei genome version 2.0 [23 (link),24 (link)]. Analysis was performed in an MS200 microarray scanner (Roche) to identify signal probe intensity of the six 50-74mer probe replicates designed from the known and predicted genes in T. reesei.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Macaque Serum IgG Antibody Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Macaque serum samples were diluted 1:100 in binding buffer (0.01M Tris-Cl, pH 7.4, 1% alkali-soluble casein, 0.05% Tween-20). Diluted sample aliquots and binding buffer-only negative controls were bound to arrays overnight for 16–20 h at 4°C. After binding, the arrays were washed 3x in wash buffer (1x TBS, 0.05% Tween-20), 10 min per wash. Primary sample binding was detected via 8F1-biotin mouse anti-primate IgG (NIH Nonhuman Primate Reagent Resource) secondary antibody. The secondary antibody was diluted 1:10,000 (final concentration 0.1 ng/µl) in secondary binding buffer (1x TBS, 1% alkali-soluble casein, 0.05% Tween-20) and incubated with arrays for 3 h at room temperature, then washed 3x in wash buffer (10 min per wash) and 30 sec in reagent-grade water. The secondary antibody was labeled with Cy5-Streptavidin (GE Healthcare; 5 ng/µl in 0.5x TBS, 1% alkali-soluble casein, 0.05% Tween-20) for 1 h at room temperature, then the array was washed 2x for 1 min in 1x TBS, and washed once for 30 sec in reagent-grade water. Fluorescent signal of the secondary antibody was detected by scanning at 635 nm at 2 µm resolution and 25% gain, using an MS200 microarray scanner (Roche NimbleGen).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!