The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Automated cell counter

Manufactured by Countstar
Sourced in China, United States

The Automated Cell Counter is a compact, high-precision laboratory instrument designed to accurately count and analyze cells. The device utilizes advanced optical and digital technologies to provide reliable cell count and viability measurements, making it a versatile tool for various applications in the life sciences and biomedical research.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

102 protocols using automated cell counter

1

Quantification of Nuclei Extracted from Human WAT

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Timing: 15 min

The following steps detail how to stain and count the number of nuclei extracted.

Add 1 drop of ReadyProbes NucBlue (Hoechst 33342) to the 500 μL nuclei solution and leave on ice protected from light for 15 min.

Note: It is possible to count the nuclei extracted using DAPI under a microscope.

Mix nuclei solution with pipetting before immediately adding 10μL of nuclei solution to countess slide.

Count nuclei with Countess 3 Automated Cell Counter (Figure 3).

Isolated Nuclei from human WAT

Nuclei isolated from human subcutaneous WAT and stained with NucBlue and counted with Countess 3 Automated Cell Counter. Image is jpg readout from the Countess 3.

Note: Typical yield is 180K nuclei at a concentration of 360K/mL.

To ensure accurate nuclei loading on the ICELL8 CX, we recommend diluting the sample with DPBS (−/−) to 200K/mL and re-counting for validation.

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Evaluating Cell Growth and Viability

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PCa cells were plated in 6-well plates in triplicate and allowed to adhere for 24Hrs prior to treatment with doxycycline (1μg/ml) or ATRA (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). At the indicated time points, cells were trypsinized, pelleted, and resuspended in a known volume. Cell counts were established using a Countess automated cell counter. Live versus dead cells were quantified by trypan blue exclusion using a Countess automated cell counter. Cell growth was determined by normalizing cell numbers at the indicated time points to the number of cells plated. Doubling times were determined using relative growth values from T24 and T96 time points.
The viability of cells expressing CD38 treated with FK866 was determined using Cell Titer-Glo 2.0 (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Briefly, cells treated with vehicle or doxycycline (1μg/mL) were plated in 96-well plates (N=7) and allowed to adhere for 8Hrs prior to the addition of FK866. Luminescence was detected using a FLUOstar Optima spectrometer (BMG Labtech, Cary, NC, USA) and viability was determined relative to control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Mineral Mixture Cytotoxicity on 3T3 Fibroblasts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The viability of 3T3 mouse fibroblasts exposed to the antibacterial mineral mixtures was measured to determine if mammalian cells could withstand the application of a mineral poultice while maintaining antibacterial characteristics. The antibacterial mineral mixtures were prepared as described previously with 95% F-hectorite clay, 5% pyrite and exchanged with 30 mM FeSO4 and autoclaved prior to testing. All experiments were performed in a 12-well plate using 3T3 mouse fibroblast cells grown to 85% confluency in RPMI media supplemented with 10% dialyzed fetal bovine serum. The fibroblast cells were reacted with 25 and 100 mg/mL concentrations of the antibacterial mineral mixtures in RPMI media. After 24 h of exposure, the media and minerals were decanted and the cells were rinsed with 0.8% sterile sodium chloride buffer three times to remove excess minerals. The cells were then trypsinized to detach them from the 12-well cell culture treated plate. Samples were then pelleted in a 1.5 mL centrifuge tube and stained with trypan blue to determine cell viability using a Countess automated cell counter. A control well with no cells and 100 mg/mL minerals was also included to determine if the minerals interfered with the viability assay.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Cell Growth Kinetics under Normoxia and Hypoxia

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
100,000 of each indicated control and knockdown cells were seeded in 24 well plates on day 0, triplicate wells of each group were trypsinized and the cell numbers were counted using Countess II Automated Cell Counter on each indicated timepoint. The regular cultured experiments were performed for day 0, 2, 4 and 6. The hypoxic experiment was performed in 3% O2 for day 0, 2 and 4.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

In Vitro Cytotoxicity Assay for Potent Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In vitro toxicity studies of the potent
compounds were accomplished according to our reported modified procedure.17 (link),24 (link) HEK293 cells were counted using a Countess automated cell counter,
and 4000 cells per well were seeded in black 96-well plates. Compounds
were serially diluted starting at 50 μg/mL, added in triplicate,
and incubated for 24 h. Resazurin solution (5%) for a final volume
of 240 μL in each well was added after 24 h. After the addition
of 5% resazurin, plates were incubated for 4 and 6 h before taking
the readings for cell viability. Fluorescence was measured at 544
nm (excitation) and 590 nm (emission) using a BMG Labtech Fluostar
Optima plate reader.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Repeated CAR T-Cell Coculture Expansion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Either 5 × 105 or 1 × 106 sorted CAR T cells were cocultured in cytokine-free Opt5 media at a 1:1 ratio with gamma-irradiated K562-CD19 cells or gamma-irradiated K562-mesothelin cells, with a total cell concentration of 1 × 106 per ml. After 7 days, cells were counted with a Countess automated cell counter, gating for cells between 3 and 15 μm in diameter. Then, 5 × 105 cells were reseeded in 1 ml of fresh Opt5 with 5 × 105 target cells. This process was repeated on days 12, 17, 22, and 27. At each time point, cell count, size, and viability were recorded.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Cell Seeding Density and Growth Kinetics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were seeded in six-well plates at 5.2 × 103 cells/cm2. Cells were trypsinized and counted over 4 days using a Countess Automated Cell Counter; 0 h is the time at plating (n = 3).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Generating Bone Marrow Chimeric Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bone marrow chimeric mice were generated as previously described by our laboratory (11 (link)). In brief, bone marrow was aseptically harvested from the tibias and femurs of eight-week-old B6.CD45.1 donor mice (n=18). Erythrocytes were lysed and the cells were counted using a Countess automated cell counter. Eight-week-old B6.CD45.2 mice (n=9) received a single 1000-cGy γ-irradiation dose using a Cs-137-based Gammacell 40 irradiator. The mice heads were shielded with a lead bar so as to deliver the irradiation to the body only. Six hours after shielded irradiation, busulfan (30 mg/kg) was administered to completely ablate the bone marrow of the recipient mice. Donor bone marrow (CD45.1) was transplanted twelve hours after busulfan ablation. Shielded bone marrow chimeras were maintained on antibiotics trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (40 mg/5 mg, respectively). Eight weeks after irradiation, 95% of the circulating monocytes were of donor origin (Fig. 1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Isolation of Human Gastric Tissue Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human gastric tissue was obtained from patients and placed into a sterile RNase-free culture dish containing an appropriate amount of calcium-free and magnesium-free 1× phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) on ice. The tissue was then transferred into the culture dish, cut into 0.5 mm2 pieces, and washed with 1× PBS, and blood residue and fatty layers were removed. Tissues were dissociated into single cells in dissociation solution. The overall cell viability was more than 85%, as confirmed by trypan blue exclusion. The single-cell suspensions were counted using the Countess II Automated Cell Counter, and the concentration was adjusted to 700–1200 cells/μl before single-cell analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Assessing Koumine's Impact on Tetrahymena

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
T. thermophila cells were cultured in SPP in test tubes containing 5 mL of medium and koumine was added at 0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4 and 0.8 mg/mL. 0 mg/mL koumine was used as blank control and 0.1% DMSO was used as negative control (NC). Penicillin G (100 units/mL), streptomycin (100 μg/mL) and amphotericin B (0.02 μg/mL) were then added to each tube of medium to prevent bacterial and fungal contamination. Cells were inoculated to a final density of 6250 cells/mL and tubes were incubated for 72 h at 30°C with constant shaking at 135 rpm [31 (link)]. Cells were counted using an automated cell counter (Countstar, Shanghai, China). Cell viability was determined at 24 h using a Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) (Nanjing Jiancheng, Nanjing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions [32 (link)]. The oxidative stress, apoptosis, DNA damage, ultrastructural changes and gene expression effects was determined after T. thermophila exposed to various levels koumine at 24 h. The specific experimental process was shown below.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!