An ROC curve was used to assess the sensitivity and specificity of both AFC and AMH levels for the prediction of OHSS in both groups. The SPSS version 15.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for all statistical analyses.
Spss version 15
SPSS version 15.0 is a data analysis software that provides statistical analysis, data management, and data visualization capabilities. It is designed to handle a wide range of data types and can be used for tasks such as regression analysis, clustering, and hypothesis testing.
Lab products found in correlation
1 241 protocols using spss version 15
Predicting OHSS using AFC and AMH
An ROC curve was used to assess the sensitivity and specificity of both AFC and AMH levels for the prediction of OHSS in both groups. The SPSS version 15.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for all statistical analyses.
Genetic Factors in Inflammatory Grade
Clinical variables were expressed as medians and 1st-3rd quantiles or number of patients and percentages, except for age (median and range). Associations between variables and NIA were assessed by Mann-Whitney U-test or Chi-squared test. Two-tailed p values below 0.05 were considered significant (SPSS version 15.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
Subsequently, significant clinical variables and SNPs were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression using a step-backward method, in which none of the variables was forced to be included into the model. ROC analyses were performed to discriminate the power of factors independently associated with inflammatory grade (SPSS version 15.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
Assessing Diminished Ovarian Reserve Markers
A 2×2 contingency table was used to assess sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of both FSH level criteria and AFC level criteria relative to AMH criteria. AMH criterion was selected as a reference to compare the other two criteria because of growing evidence favoring its utility as the marker of choice for DOR (12 (link)).
The kappa statistic was used to ascertain agreement between the FSH level criteria and AMH level criteria, and the AFC criteria and AMH criteria.
SPSS version 15.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for all statistical analysis.
Luting Agent Evaluation Through Statistical Analysis
Evaluating Shrimp Growth and Nutritional Outcomes
Student t-test was used to compare nutritional properties between two different feeds (commercial pellet and ex-situ biofloc), whereas one-way analysis of variance (One-way ANOVA) followed by multiple comparison test (Tukey; p < 0.05) was used to compare among shrimp samples-fed with three different treatments by SPSS ® Version 15.0.
Relative fold change of gene expression among shrimp samples-fed with three different treatments was analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (One-way ANOVA) followed by Duncan Post-Hoc Test (p < 0.05) using SPSS ® Version 15.0.
Statistical Analysis of Categorical Data
Comparative Statistical Analysis Protocol
Amflow® Assisted Ventilation Accuracy
Comparative Analysis of POAG and Controls
The qualitative variables were described as percentages, and quantitative variables were described as means and standard deviations or median, maximum, and minimum depending on their distributional characteristics in both groups. Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used to assess the normal distribution of data.
A paired-sample t test was used for the comparative analysis of the repeated measurements taken from the POAG group; its corresponding non-parametric Wilcoxon test was used for non-normal datasets. All contrasts were bilateral with a significance level of 0.05.
For the comparative analysis of the different measurements between the POAG group and control group, the student’s t test for independent samples or its corresponding non-parametric U of Mann–Whitney test was used. All contrasts were bilateral with a significance level of 0.05.
Evaluating MGIT 960 Mycobacterium Detection
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!