The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Auriga fe sem

Manufactured by Zeiss
Sourced in Germany

The Auriga FE-SEM is a field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM) manufactured by Zeiss. It is designed to provide high-resolution imaging and analysis capabilities for a wide range of materials and applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

14 protocols using auriga fe sem

1

Nanostructure Characterization: Microscopy and Diffraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples for FE-SEM and EDX were prepared by drop-casting the suspensions containing the nanostructures onto cleaned silicon substrates, with subsequent drying in oven at 120 °C for 30 min.
Morphology and cell interaction investigations were carried out using a Zeiss Auriga FE-SEM available at SNN-Lab, operated at different accelerating voltages (varying between 2 and 5 keV) depending on the sample type.
The chemical elemental composition was investigated by EDX analysis equipped together with FE-SEM (Auriga, Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany), and operated at 17 keV.
The crystalline structure and phase purity analysis was performed by X-ray diffraction using a Bruker (AXS D8-Advance) X-ray powder diffractometer equipped with incident-beam focusing X-ray mirrors and a position sensitive detector (Bruker AXS GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany). Data were measured at room temperature, in transmission mode, using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å, 40 kV at 40 mA), in a 2θ angular range ranging from 20° to 140° with a step size of 0.022° and 1 s of counting time. Samples were prepared as capillary mounts. Data were evaluated by the Rietveld method using Topas software [54 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Visualizing ZNGs Effects on Bacterial Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Treated and untreated cells of P. aeruginosa were incubated at 37 °C for 1 h, while S. aureus ones for 30 min. Short treatment times were chosen to obtain images in which the effects of ZNGs on bacterial cells were clearly visible. The tested concentration of ZNGs was 50 µg/mL in 1 mL of sterile water. The protocol for samples preparation was performed as described in Olivi et al. [21 (link)]. Imaging was performed using a Zeiss Auriga FE-SEM, operated at an accelerating voltage of 5 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterization of Electrospun Fiber Scaffolds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Characterization of electrospun fibers was performed using Auriga FE-SEM (Zeiss, Germany). Samples were sputter-coated with gold and imaged at several magnifications using an accelerating voltage of 5 kV. Average fiber diameter and fiber diameter distribution were determined by measuring at least 100 individual fibers from at least 5 different images using ImageJ software (ImageJ 1.49, National Institutes of Health, USA). Average pore size and pore size distribution were determined by thresholding and Analyze Particles module in ImageJ. To examine morphological changes of osteoblasts and ECs after attachment to fibers, scaffolds were removed from culture media 24h after seeding, washed three times with PBS, and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde solution for 30 mins. Scaffolds were dehydrated in ethanol gradient, dried in a desiccator overnight, sputter-coated with gold, and examined under the SEM operated at 3kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Implant Biofilms

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SEM was performed a previously described.15 (link) Briefly, the implants from the in vitro studies were
placed into 24 well plates, fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde/4%
paraformaldehyde in 0.1M cacodylate overnight and post-fixed in buffered 1% osmium
tetroxide. A pipet tip was placed against the wall of the wells, for fluid exchange or
removal to reduce disruption of biofilm during dehydration in a graded series of ethanol
to 100%. The pins were then critically point dried, mounted onto aluminum stubs
and sputtercoated with gold prior to imaging using a Zeiss Auriga FE SEM. Three SEM
micrographs per sample group were randomly chosen for descriptive analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of Worn Surfaces

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphologies of the worn surfaces were determined by Zeiss AURIGA FESEM. The wear depth and wear track profiles after the friction tests were obtained by a noncontact 3D surface profiler (Olympus OLS4000), and the wear volume of the plates was calculated from the wear depth. The final values quoted for the wear volume of the specimen were averages of three tests results. The chemical compositions of the worn surfaces were characterized by a VG model Escalab 250 X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) with Al-Kα radiation as the excitation source. And the binding energy of C1s at 284.6 eV was utilized as the reference. Prior to the analysis, the specimens were cleaned ultrasonically for 5 min with acetone, in order to eliminate the residual lubricant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Catalyst Surface Morphology Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Catalyst surface morphology was characterized by a ZEISS Auriga FE-SEM operated at 3 kV. XPS measurements were performed using a Thermo Scientific K-Alpha spectrophotometer with a monochromated Al Kα X-ray radiation source.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

SEM Imaging of Paraformaldehyde-Fixed PLVs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SEM was performed, as previously described (4 (link)). Briefly, PLVs were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde/2.5% glutaraldehyde/0.1M cacodylate overnight, post-fixed in buffered 1% osmium tetroxide, dehydrated, critically point dried, mounted onto aluminum stubs and sputtercoated with gold prior to imaging using a Zeiss Auriga FE SEM. Three SEM micrographs per sample group were randomly chosen for descriptive analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

SEM Analysis of Material Morphology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A Zeiss Auriga FESEM has been used. SEM analysis was performed to evaluate the morphology of the materials. The analyses were carried out on the as-received materials (without any pretreatment).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Microscopic Characterization of Nanocomposites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) and scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) were employed to analyze the morphology of GICs, TEGOs, GNPs and nanocomposite samples, by using a Zeiss Auriga FE-SEM (Oberkochen, Germania) available at SNN-Lab of Sapienza University of Rome. Prior to the microscopic analysis, nanocomposite specimens were broken in liquid nitrogen and sputter coated with a 10 nm Cr layer, by using a sputter coater (Quorum Tech Q150T, Quorum Technologies Ltd., Laughton, UK).
Further characterization of GNP flakes was carried out through Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM), using a Bruker Dimension Icon AFM (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA), operated in tapping mode. In order to realize specimens suitable for AFM imaging, 10 μL aliquots of a GNP-acetone suspension, were drop cast onto a 300 nm SiO2 coated Si wafer chip and the resulting samples were allowed to dry at 100 °C for 10 min in a laboratory oven.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Characterizing GNP-Coated Ti-Disks via FE-SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All Ti-disk surfaces were characterized through a Field Emission-Scanning Electron Microscope (FE-SEM) using an Auriga FE-SEM (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany), available at the Sapienza Nanotechnology and Nanoscience Laboratory. The FE-SEM images were used to evaluate the size (µm2) of the GNPs and the percentage of Ti-disks surface-coated by the GNPs. Image J (Java-based image processing program) was used for image analysis. To determine the reproducibility of the spraying process, the GPN coating of Ti-disk surfaces was carried out at two different times. For each suspension of colloidal GNPs, the mean surface coating percentage of the first five Ti-disks was compared to the mean percentage of the second group of five Ti-disks.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!