The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

21 protocols using lumar v12 stereomicroscope

1

Quantification of Pancreatic Cell Populations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
β-cell number, mass area and exocrine pancreas area were determined as previously described (Lodh et al., 2015 (link)). Briefly, the size of the β-cell mass (area of mCherry expression) and the size of the exocrine pancreas (area of GFP expression) were quantified using a Zeiss Lumar v12 stereomicroscope and ImageJ software. The number of β-cells was quantified by fixing the embryos at 5 days post fertilization (dpf) in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA), dehydrating in 100% methanol, and flat mounting in ProLong Gold antifade (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with the right lateral side facing the coverslip. Sufficient pressure was applied to disrupt the islets in order to visualize individual cells. The number of β-cells was counted manually under an Olympus ix50 with cellSense imaging software at 20X magnification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Morpholino-Mediated GHRH Analysis in Zebrafish

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MOs, described below, were dissolved in nuclease-free water and stored in −20 °C as 1 mM stock. Serial dilutions were made using nuclease-free water to 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, and 0.4 mM working solution with 20% Phenol Red (Sigma; 0.5% in DPBS, sterile filtered, endotoxin tested). Before the injection, MOs were denatured at 65 °C for 5 min and quickly spun to avoid the formation of aggregates. Three to five microliters was loaded in a microinjection machine, and embryos at one or two cell stages were injected with 1–2 nl of a solution containing antisense targeting morpholino or standard control oligo. Each MO oligo injection was repeated at least three times, and doses were adjusted to optimize the phenotype-to-toxicity ratio. Following morpholino injections, embryos were raised in egg water, changed daily, under standard light/dark cycle up to 6 days post-fertilization (dpf). Dead embryos were excluded at 1 dpf. Embryos were assayed for quantitative RT-PCR of GHRH at 5 dpf. Linear body length (forehead to tail fin) was determined using a micrometer at 5 dpf. Embryos were mounted in 2.5% methyl cellulose, and images were taken by AxionVision (Ver3.1) software with a Lumar V12 Stereo Microscope (Carl Zeiss).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Morpholino-Mediated GHRH Analysis in Zebrafish

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MOs, described below, were dissolved in nuclease-free water and stored in −20 °C as 1 mM stock. Serial dilutions were made using nuclease-free water to 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, and 0.4 mM working solution with 20% Phenol Red (Sigma; 0.5% in DPBS, sterile filtered, endotoxin tested). Before the injection, MOs were denatured at 65 °C for 5 min and quickly spun to avoid the formation of aggregates. Three to five microliters was loaded in a microinjection machine, and embryos at one or two cell stages were injected with 1–2 nl of a solution containing antisense targeting morpholino or standard control oligo. Each MO oligo injection was repeated at least three times, and doses were adjusted to optimize the phenotype-to-toxicity ratio. Following morpholino injections, embryos were raised in egg water, changed daily, under standard light/dark cycle up to 6 days post-fertilization (dpf). Dead embryos were excluded at 1 dpf. Embryos were assayed for quantitative RT-PCR of GHRH at 5 dpf. Linear body length (forehead to tail fin) was determined using a micrometer at 5 dpf. Embryos were mounted in 2.5% methyl cellulose, and images were taken by AxionVision (Ver3.1) software with a Lumar V12 Stereo Microscope (Carl Zeiss).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Cryosectioning and Imaging Skin Grafts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The mice were given an overdose of sodium pentobarbital, and the back skin was removed and subsequently fixed overnight in 4% PFA at 4°C and then placed in increasing sucrose solutions at 4°C each overnight (10%, 20%, and 30% sucrose) before being snap frozen in blocks of OCT in liquid nitrogen‐cooled isobutane and stored at −80°C. The skin was sectioned at 30‐μm thicknesses using a Leica CM1950 cryotome (Leica Biosystems, Buffalo Grove, IL, http://www.leicabiosystems) for immunohistochemical analysis (n = 24 sections per animal; 3 animals for each condition). The grafts were fixed overnight in 4% PFA at 4°C then changed to phosphate‐buffered saline (PBS) overnight at 4°C. The total number of GFP+ HFs was counted using a Zeiss Lumar V12 Stereo microscope, and higher magnification imaging was done with a Zeiss Observer microscope using Axiovision software (Carl Zeiss Microscopy).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Microscopy Imaging Techniques for Cerebellar Sections

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In the case of bright field microscopy, a Zeiss M-2 microscope was applied and images were taken using Zen software. For fluorescence microscopy, a Zeiss Lumar.V12 stereomicroscope was applied to record the images of cerebellar sections using AxioVision 4 software. For high magnification, fluorescence microscopy a Zeiss Z2 Imager with Zen software was used to record the images. After cropping the images, they were corrected for brightness and contrast, and finally assembled into montages using Adobe Photoshop CS5 Version 12.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Measuring ECT Cross-Sectional Area

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After 5 days, the ECT were imaged from the side and top with a Lumar.V12 stereo microscope (Zeiss). The diameters of the ECT were measured at several positions and the cross-sectional areas (CSA) were calculated assuming an elliptical shape of the tissues (Santos et al. 2021 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Embryo Fixation and Sectioning

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All embryos were dissected in cold PBS and fixed for 20 minutes in 4% paraformaldehyde at 25°C. Following imaging of embryos with a Zeiss Lumar V12 stereomicroscope, samples used for tissue analysis were processed for either cryosection or paraffin embedding. Cryo-embedded samples were flash frozen in O.C.T. compound and sectioned to obtain 8 to 10μm thick sections as described (28 (link)). Paraffin-embedded samples were processed and embedded by the GCI Histology Core Facility and 6μm serial sections were obtained.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantifying Drosophila Eye Size

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Homozygous UAS-C4 flies were crossed to ey-GAL4/CyO flies. F1 progeny were then selected based on their wing phenotype; straight winged flies expressed RNAi to deplete Nopp140, while curly-winged siblings served as a control. Flies were imaged using a Lumar.V12 SteREO microscope (Zeiss, Jena, Germany) fitted with an Axiocam MRc5 camera (Zeiss, Jena, Germany). To measure eye size, a line was drawn around visible ommatidia using the contour (spline) function on the ZEN 2 Pro Software (Zeiss). The data are presented as average eye size (measured in μm2) per genotype.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Detailed Limb Morphology Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine whether any difference existed in the external morphological characteristics of the maxillofacial structures and limbs, both the malformed and normal fetuses and NBs of DRs and CRs were analyzed using a Lumar V12 stereomicroscope (Zeiss), with special emphasis on the development of the eyelids, ears, and interdigital webbing. Images were captured using an Axiocam MRc microscope digital camera (Zeiss). In addition, 10 forelimbs and 10 hind legs from each group, previously fixed in 4% formalin, were processed to determine their histological characteristics. These specimens were made transparent with cedar oil and embedded in VIP (Sakura Finetek, Torrance, CA, USA) paraffin. Serial 5-μm thick histological sections in the sagittal plane were prepared along the palmar and plantar surfaces and stained with Hematoxylin and Eosin. An equal number of limbs were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde and processed for analysis with a scanning electron microscope. After dehydration in a graded series of alcohols, these samples were prepared via critical point drying in a Samdri 789a (Tousimis Rockville MD) apparatus and shadowed with a 350-nm thick gold layer in a Denton Vacuum Desk 1A apparatus (Cherry Hill Industrial Centre, NJ, USA). The samples were observed at 15 kV in a JEOL JSM 5300 scanning electron microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

EdU Labeling of Proliferating Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To label proliferating cells, pregnant dams mated with Fgf20-/- males were given one intraperitoneal injection of 25 mg/kg body weight EdU (Life Technologies, Eugene, OR) dissolved in saline 2 hr prior to sacrifice. To label cultured dermises,NMRI E13.5 dermises cultured with FGF20- or FGF9-loaded beads for 18 hr as described above. During the last 2 hr, 10 µM EdU (Life Technologies, Eugene, OR) was introduced in the medium. The samples were then fixed with 4% PFA and EdU detection was performed with Click-iT kit (Life Technologies, Eugene, OR) according to manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, samples were permeabilized with 3% BSA, 0.5% Triton X-100 (MP Biomedicals, Solon, OH) for 1 hr, stained with Click-iT reaction cocktail containing Alexa488-azide for 2 hr protected from light, washed thoroughly for 2 hr with PBS and mounted in Vectashield and imaged using Lumar.V12 stereomicroscope with 1.2x objective and AxioCam ICc camera (all Zeiss).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!