The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Leica mz16 stereomicroscope

Manufactured by Leica camera
Sourced in United States

The Leica MZ16 is a stereomicroscope designed for a variety of laboratory applications. It features a comprehensive optical system, allowing for high-resolution imaging and magnification capabilities. The stereomicroscope provides a three-dimensional view of the specimen, enabling users to observe and analyze samples in detail.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using leica mz16 stereomicroscope

1

Quantifying Drosophila Morphological Traits

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fly heads were removed from newly eclosed flies. Heads were passed through a graded alcohol series for 24 hours each (25%–50%–75%-absolute), passed through Hexamethyldisalizane, and mounted on EM stubs using carbon tape (Ted Pella). Fly heads were dried for 24 hours, sputter coated with gold, and examined with a Hitachi scanning electron microscope at an accelerating voltage of 20 kV. Images were acquired as TIFF files that were collated using Adobe Illustrator. For quantitative analysis of eye size (facet number), crosses were established in duplicates, and ≥15 adult flies for each genotype were photographed using a Leica MZ16 stereomicroscope equipped with a Leica DFC-480 digital camera. Facet numbers were manually counted from TIFF images of the eyes and subjected to statistical analysis. For bristle phenotypes, newly eclosed adults were photographed using a Leica MZ16 stereomicroscope or by scanning EM. For quantitative analysis of the bristle phenotypes, multiple crosses were established (triplicates), and adults were scored for bristle defects. Wing margin phenotypes were documented using a Leica MZ16 stereomicroscope. Eye size (facet counts) and bristle and wing defects were statistically analyzed using the Student’s t-test, with the exception of Fig. 1F, which was determined using the chi-squared test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Zebrafish Embryo Microinjection and Cyst Formation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Approval for zebrafish research was obtained from the University Committee on the Use and Care of Animals (UCUCA) of the University of Freiburg. Transgenic wt1b::GFP zebrafish line was raised and maintained as described60 (link). Fertilized eggs were microinjected with 4 nl of injection solution at the one-to-two-cell stage with MOs (Gene Tools LLC) diluted in 200 mM KCl, 0.1% Phenol Red (Sigma-Aldrich Corporation) and 10 mM HEPES. zFat1 MO has been previously described47 (link). About 0.5 pmol of zebrafish p53 MO (5′- GCGCCATTGCTTTGCAAGAATTG -3′, Gene Tools) was always co-injected to reduce the unspecific effects of the MOs61 (link). About 1.6 pmol zFat1 MO was injected either alone or together with either 1 μg ml−1 of Rho/Rac/Cdc42 Activator I or 0.5 U ml−1 of Rac/Cdc42 activator II (Cytoskeleton). Scoring of percentage of cyst formation and zebrafish embryo imaging was done on mixed male and female embryos at 48 h post fertilization under a Leica MZ16 stereo microscope (Leica).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Worm Imaging Using Stereomicroscope Setups

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Worms mounted with the glass-bottom dish method were imaged with two alternative stereomicroscope set-ups: an Olympus SZ60 stereomicroscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a DinoEye AM423x eyepiece camera (BigC.com, Torrance, CA, USA) and a Leica MZ16 stereomicroscope (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) equipped with a Nikon D80 DSLR camera (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). Both cameras were interfaced to a PC computer through USB serial ports and operated using manufacturer’s software (Fig. 2, lower left). The microscope was focused at a focal plane of interest and images were captured at regular intervals (2–5 min) with a pixel resolution of 1024 × 768 (DinoEye) or 1936 × 1296 (Nikon D80). Images were then compiled as single XYT stacks, cropped and exported as uncompressed or JPG compressed AVI video files using ImageJ [62 ]. Video file post-processing and re-encoding, if needed, was done using VirtualDub (http://www.virtualdub.org) and online editing at YouTube (http://www.YouTube.com).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Zebrafish Knockdown Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Zebrafish strains were maintained and raised as described (Epting et al, 2015). Transgenic wt1b::GFP zebrafish embryos (Perner et al, 2007) were injected with 0.5 mM morpholino (MO; Gene Tools LLC) targeting lkb1 (5′‐GAGATCCGCGCCCACGCTCATCTTT‐3′ as described; Jacob et al, 2011) or nphp1 (5′‐CCCTCTTCTCTTTGGAGGCATGTTG‐3′ as described; Slanchev et al, 2011) at the one‐cell stage. All MOs were co‐injected with 0.1 mM p53 MO (5′‐GCGCCATTGCTTTGCAAGAATTG‐3′) to reduce the unspecific effects of the reagents. To correct for the amount of total MO in the combined knockdown experiment, 0.5 mM standard control MO (5′‐CCTCTTACCTCAGTTACAATTTATA‐3′) was simultaneously injected. Embryos were analyzed at 48–50 h.p.f. under a Leica MZ16 stereo microscope (Leica). Images were recorded using a Leica DFC450 C (Leica).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Whole Mount Imaging of Zebrafish Embryos

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Brightfield images of whole mount in situ embryo stains were taken using an Axioplan2 microscope with Axiocam camera and using Axiovision software (Carl Zeiss). Embryos of the Tg(wt1b:EGFP) line were analyzed under a Leica MZ16 stereomicroscope (Leica), and nonconfocal fluorescent images were taken with a SPOT Insight Fire Wire System (Diagnostic Instruments). All images were exported as TIFF files and imported into Adobe Photoshop software CS2 to arrange figures. Confocal images of whole mount zebrafish immunostainings were generated with a Carl Zeiss LSM510 laser scanning microscope. Confocal z‐stacks were projected to one plane (maximum intensity projection).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Compiling Entomological Collection Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In addition to the material from the 'Coleção Entomológica Padre Jesus Santiago Moure' , Universidade Federal do Paraná (DZUP), specimens were loaned from the following institutions and curators: MZUSP, Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil -Dr. Carlos Roberto Brandão; RPSP, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil -Dr. Carlos Alberto Garófalo; AMNH, American Museum Natural of History, New York, USA -Dr. James M. Carpenter.
The terminology for the external morphology follows Bohart & Menke (1976) supplemented by Richards (1934) . The flagellomeres are referred as F1 to F10 in females and F1 to F11 in males. In the item 'Examined material' , all label data are transcribed, with information from each label presented between quotation marks, and the different lines in the label by a backslash (\). Specimens were photographed using a Leica DFC 500 camera attached to a Leica MZ16 stereomicroscope. The images were treated using the software Auto-Montage Zerene Stacker (Zerene Systems LLC) and edited in Gimp 2.8.22 (GNU General Public License).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!